A tract of land was owned by person M. Person M was not sure about the title over the property. The land was sold to person R, and a quitclaim deed were executed by him. R had full rights over the land. Person L sued R to get the land evicted and claimed to have a better title over the land. L claimed to have a warranty deed that conferred the quitclaim deed. To find : The claim of L on the title of the land.

Question

Wilson engages Ruth to sell Wilson’s antique walnut chest to Harold for $2,500. The next day, Ruth learns that Sandy is willing to pay $3,000 for Wilson’s chest. Ruth nevertheless sells the chest to Harold. Wilson then discovers these facts. What are Wilson’s rights, if any, against Ruth?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 26, Problem 1BS

Summary Introduction

Case summary: A tract of land was owned by person M. Person M was not sure about the title over the property. The land was sold to person R, and a quitclaim deed were executed by him. R had full rights over the land. Person L sued R to get the land evicted and claimed to have a better title over the land. L claimed to have a warranty deed that conferred the quitclaim deed.

To find : The claim of L on the title of the land.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Wilson engages Ruth to sell Wilson’s antique walnut chest to Harold for $2,500. The next day, Ruth learns that Sandy is willing to pay $3,000 for Wilson’s chest. Ruth nevertheless sells the chest to Harold. Wilson then discovers these facts. What are Wilson’s rights, if any, against Ruth?

Eileen Murphy often cared for her elderly neighbor, Thomas Kenney. He paid her $25 per day for her help and once gave her a bank certificate of deposit worth $25,000. She spent the money. Murphy alleged that shortly before his death, Kenney gave her a large block of shares in three corporations. He called his broker, intending to instruct him to transfer the shares to Murphy’s name, but the broker was ill and unavailable. So Kenney told Murphy to write her name on the shares and keep them, which she did. Two weeks later Kenney died. When Murphy presented the shares to Kenney’s broker to transfer ownership to her, the broker refused because Kenney had never endorsed the shares as the law requires, that is, signed them over to Murphy. Was Murphy entitled to the $25,000? To the shares?

Oscar conveys Grouchland to Grover on January 16, 2019. Oscar conveys the same property to Elmo who does not know about Grover and who records his deed on January 18, 2019. Oscar then conveys the property to Bert who doesn't know about Grover or Elmo and who does not record the deed. Oscar then conveys the property to Ernie who knows about Bert and records the deed. Who has title to property if the jurisdiction follows a notice statute? Ernie Elmo Bert Grover