Case summary: An animal espousing organization FA filed a suit against killing and capturing of migratory birds at an International Airport. Authority PA operates the airport and had obtained a permit from the government agency FW. The permit allowed the authority PA to kill or capture specific birds to prevent the occurring of mishaps due to collisions of the birds with the aircraft. The organization FA protested against the issue of the permit to the airport authority.
To find: The regulation which is at issue in this particular case.
Case summary: An animal espousing organization FA filed a suit against killing and capturing of migratory birds at an International Airport. The authority PA operating the airport had obtained a permit from the government agency FW. The permit allowed the authority PA to kill or capture specific birds to prevent the occurring of mishaps due to collisions of the birds with the aircraft. The organization FA protested against the issue of the permit to the airport authority.
To find: The rule of statutory interpretation that was applied by the court to explain the regulation.
Case summary: An animal espousing organization FA filed a suit against killing and capturing of migratory birds at an International Airport. The authority PA operating the airport had obtained a permit from the government agency FW. The permit allowed the authority PA to kill or capture specific birds to prevent the occurring of mishaps due to collisions of the birds with the aircraft. The organization FA protested against the issue of the permit to the airport authority.
To find: The manner in which the plaintiff wanted the regulation to be interpreted and the response of court to it.
Case summary: An animal espousing organization FA filed a suit against killing and capturing of migratory birds at an International Airport. The authority PA operating the airport had obtained a permit from the government agency FW. The permit allowed the authority PA to kill or capture specific birds to prevent the occurring of mishaps due to collisions of the birds with the aircraft. The organization FA protested against the issue of the permit to the airport authority.
To find: The outcome of the interpretation of the court on the regulation.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Chapter 25 Solutions
Bundle: The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th + Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card
- Do you think courts have struck the right balance between first amendment rights and the antitrust goal of economic efficiency (e.g., preventing undue influence from special interest groups) through the Noerr-Pennington doctrine? If you believe the doctrine is too permissive, what alternatives would you propose?arrow_forwardwhat was the issue that court trying to find 22.2 ( Genesis Health Clubs, Inc. v. LED Solar and light co)arrow_forwardDoes the concept of judicial interpretation of the law mean that judges can make whatever law they wish? And, how can courts remain flexible, if they are required to follow precedent?arrow_forward
- A) Under what circumstances might a court have committed the cellophane fallacy? B) In the Google Shopping case, Google was found to have abused its dominant position under Art 102 TFEU. On what grounds did the courts find Google guilty?C) In the Microsoft case, Microsoft was found to have committed an offence under 102 TFEU. What was the offence, and why is it a problem for Microsoft and not for other competitors.D) Suppose a firm can produce for a marginal cost of 2 and receive a price of 4. What would the elasticity of demand for its product be?arrow_forwardAn example of a legal object may be : a) an idea you have for a new business venture B) a 21-year old male person C) all natural and juristic persons D) all the abovearrow_forward1. How does a persuasive precedent differ from a binding precedent and are courts always bound by such precedents? a. What are the three main methods in which the doctrine of precedent operates within a legal system?arrow_forward
- Write short notes about the importance of the following cases - (i) (ii) (iii) Mankayi v AngloGold Ashanti Ltd (2011) 6 BLLR 527 (CC); Mahlangu v Minister of Labour [Case NO.79180/15]; and Jooste v Score Supermarket Trading (Pty) Ltd (Minister of Labour Intervening) (1999) 2 BCLR 139. (iv) The UIA provides a few benefits including the unemployment insurance fund or commonly known as the UIF. However, some employees who ordinarily qualify in terms of the Act may under certain circumstances not be eligible to claim it. List those circumstances.arrow_forwarddo some basic research into a case that is before the U.S. Supreme Court right now: Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, and respond to the following question:Who are the parties in the case?arrow_forwardPlease discuss the legal and ethical status of the physician's actions in the following case. Include in your analysis any relevant laws A complainant alleged that a private practice physician denied her access to her medical records, because the complainant had an outstanding balance for services the physician had provided. The physician openly admitted that the complainant was not given access to her medical record because of the outstanding balance. The physician noted that it is clearly spelled out in the information given to patients that access to their records is contingent on payment in full.arrow_forward
- 1. Regarding the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the following statement is true: The act limits its scope to protection with no recovery plans for the species it protects. The act does not allow courts or regulators to take economic factors into consideration in applying its provisions. The act was passed in the year 1952 under the guidelines given by the panel on the Council on Environmental Quality. The act has its scope limited to private businesses. The act provides for exemptions that are applicable to private activities for certain important federal projects. 2. Under the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) quasi-judicial power, it has the right to regulate the various stock exchanges. appoint commissioners. conduct investigations. create legislation relating to federal securities laws.…arrow_forwardwrite down this answer?arrow_forward1. Discuss and compare the functions of regulations, incentive and pricing mechanisms with respect to achieving environmental goals.2. With respect to product safety, what is strict liability, and what older standard does it replace?3. With respect to proprietary information, what is a trade secret, and how does it differ from information that’s patented or copyrighted?4. When employers are gathering information about job applicants or current employees, what is the meaning of informed consent?5. What are the principles of the old system of mercantile capitalism?6. What is a corporation, and what is the principle of limited liability?7. What is an ecosystem, and what is meant by interdependency in an ecosystem?8. List and briefly explain the 4 key features of capitalism.Keep answers short and accurate.arrow_forward
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education