Case summary:In this case, a person M hired a fire safety consultancy OFP, owned by the person D for the disposal of insulation from his building. D and M's employees were aware of the fact that the insulation contains asbestos but they did not have a license for its removal. Ignoring this fact, they completed the work by dumping the hazardous substance at certain places which resulted in the cleaning cost of $50,000. The court convicted M for the violation of the Clean Air Act and he was sentenced an imprisonment for 120 months as well as fine.
To find:The results if M had the license for removing asbestos.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 25 Solutions
Lms Integrated Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card Cross/miller’s The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th
- How did the court evaluate the Prewitt v Numismatic Funding Corporation case?arrow_forwardThe general rule is that there is no duty to rescue another, absent a special relationship. Was the Court correct to impose a duty on the psychologist to a third party? What are the implications for a society where legal duties to rescue are enforced? What are your refined ideas about the relationship of law and ethical behavior?arrow_forwardThough this case is fictitious, the reality of collapsed mines in the coal industry is an unfortunate reality. The use of cases can cause general questions in ethics to come into clearer focus. Consider the case of the collapsed mine shaft. In a town in West Virginia, miners were digging coal in a tunnel thousands of feet below the surface. An explosion traps eight miners in a pocket. The explosion was one of great force, and the extent of the tunnel’s collapse was considerable. The cost of reaching the men in time to save their lives would amount to several million dollars. Discuss the case study questions in details, giving your opinion, and using the ethical theories in your discussion. 1. Did the manager owe more to the stockholders of the corporation or to the trapped workers? Discuss 2. Should he use the slower, safer, cheaper way of reaching them and save a large sum of money, or the faster, more dangerous, more expensive way, and possibly save their lives? Discuss…arrow_forward
- Though this case is fictitious, the reality of collapsed mines in the coal industry is an unfortunate reality. The use of cases can cause general questions in ethics to come into clearer focus. Consider the case of the collapsed mine shaft. In a town in West Virginia, miners were digging coal in a tunnel thousands of feet below the surface. An explosion traps eight miners in a pocket. The explosion was one of great force, and the extent of the tunnel’s collapse was considerable. The cost of reaching the men in time to save their lives would amount to several million dollars. Discuss the case study questions in details, giving your opinion, and using the ethical theories in your discussion. 1. The problem facing the manager was whether the expenditure (Expenses) of such a large sum was worth it. Discuss 2. What, after all, was a human life worth? Discuss 3. Who should make the decision, and how should it be made? Discussarrow_forwardWhat are the factors which will allow a court to pierce the corporate veil?arrow_forwardSue is a fifty-five year old employee of company A. Her children are out of college and her parents have both died. Company A offers a child care program to all employees along with an elder care program. However, Sue, like many other employees, has no need for these services, neither now or in the future. Should the firm retain these programs? Should alternative benefits for employees who have no use for such services be offered?arrow_forward
- Will is an appraiser. He accepts compensation based on the value of the property he is appraising. In doing so, Will: violated FHA ethics standards violated USPAP ethics standards followed FHA ethics standards followed USPAP ethics standardsarrow_forwardWhat is the Specific duty and Ad valorem Duty? Give the difference between the two.arrow_forwardwrite down this answer?arrow_forward
- Who may be called upon to do jury duty? What exemptions are there to this?arrow_forwardAssume that adulterating Magentum is a strict liability crime and a tort. Which of the following will most likely occur? The government will bring charges against the businesses for the strict liability crime and individuals injured by drinking the adulterated Magentum will bring tort suits. The government will file assault and battery charges against the businesses. The government will bring criminal assault charges against the businesses, push for punitive damages, and sue the business owners for torts. Individuals will press charges against the businesses for attempted manslaughter.arrow_forwardCEO terminated Linda and terminated five childcare workers, resulting in a violation of the state law regulating ratio requirements. Linda's employer did not give her a reason why she was fired. Linda worked for the corporation for 10 years and consistently had very high scores on her performance reviews before her termination. Linda did not have an employment contract. What are examples of the causes of action that Linda could bring against her former employer and the potential outcomes?arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education