
Subpart (a):
The preventive health care cost effectiveness.
Subpart (a):

Answer to Problem 3P
The total cost of 100 tests is $10,000. The total future medical expense averted is $15,000. The medical expense saved after setting up of the screening system is $5,000.
Explanation of Solution
The preventive health care measures are those medical precautionary measures which help the people to stay healthy and free from diseases. The screening system helps the people to easily identify and detect various diseases in their early stages which will help them to treat the diseases easily and affordably without much hassle.
The cost of one screening test is $100 according to the given information and the number of persons taking the screening test is 100. Thus, the total cost of taking the medical screening test can be calculated by multiplying the cost per screening test with the total number of persons taking the screening test as follows:
Thus, the total expense of 100 screening tests is $10,000.
The given percentage of persons having the test result positive is 15%. Thus, the total number of persons having positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the total number of persons with the given percentage as follows:
Thus, there will be 15 persons having the positive results from the screening test.
The amount of the future medical expense saved by the individual when the test result is positive is $1,000. Thus, the total future medical expense that can be saved by the people having the positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the per person medical expense saved with the total number of persons having positive test results as follows:
Thus, the total future medical expense saved by the persons having the positive test results is $15,000.
The cost of setting up the screening system is $10,000 and the total future medical expense saved is $15,000. Thus, the net future medical expense saved can be calculated by subtracting the cost of setting up the screening system from the total medical expense saved as follows:
Thus, the net medical expense saved after reducing the cost of setting up the screening test is $5,000.
Concept introduction:
Preventive health care: They are the measures taken in order to prevent the occurrence of a disease rather than treatment of a disease.
Sub part (b):
The net medical expense loss after reducing the cost of screening test.
Sub part (b):

Answer to Problem 3P
The total cost of 100 tests is $10,000. The total future medical expense averted is $5,000. The medical expense lost after setting up of the screening system is -$5,000.
Explanation of Solution
The cost of one screening test is $100 according to the given information and the number of persons taking the screening test is 100. Thus, the total cost of taking the medical screening test can be calculated by multiplying the cost per screening test with the total number of persons taking the screening test as follows:
Thus, the total expense for 100 screening tests is $10,000.
The given percentage of persons having the test result as positive is 5%. Thus, the total number of persons having positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the total number of persons with the given percentage as follows:
Thus, there will be 5 persons having the positive results from the screening test.
The amount of the future medical expense saved by the individual when the test result is positive is $1,000. Thus, the total future medical expense saved by the people having the positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the per person medical expense saved with the total number of persons having positive test results as follows:
Thus, the total future medical expense saved by the persons having the positive test results is $5,000.
The cost of setting up the screening system is $10,000 and the total future medical expense saved is $5,000. Thus, the net future medical expense saved can be calculated by subtracting the cost of setting up the screening system from the total medical expense saved as follows:
Since the result is having a negative sign, it shows that the expense of setting up the screening system is higher than the benefit received from the use of the screening system. Thus, the net result is a loss. Thus, the net medical expense loss after reducing the cost of setting up the screening test is -$5,000.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 24 Solutions
Microeconomics
- I need help in seeing how these are the answers. If you could please write down your steps so I can see how it's done please.arrow_forwardSuppose that a random sample of 216 twenty-year-old men is selected from a population and that their heights and weights are recorded. A regression of weight on height yields Weight = (-107.3628) + 4.2552 x Height, R2 = 0.875, SER = 11.0160 (2.3220) (0.3348) where Weight is measured in pounds and Height is measured in inches. A man has a late growth spurt and grows 1.6200 inches over the course of a year. Construct a confidence interval of 90% for the person's weight gain. The 90% confidence interval for the person's weight gain is ( ☐ ☐) (in pounds). (Round your responses to two decimal places.)arrow_forwardSuppose that (Y, X) satisfy the assumptions specified here. A random sample of n = 498 is drawn and yields Ŷ= 6.47 + 5.66X, R2 = 0.83, SER = 5.3 (3.7) (3.4) Where the numbers in parentheses are the standard errors of the estimated coefficients B₁ = 6.47 and B₁ = 5.66 respectively. Suppose you wanted to test that B₁ is zero at the 5% level. That is, Ho: B₁ = 0 vs. H₁: B₁ #0 Report the t-statistic and p-value for this test. Definition The t-statistic is (Round your response to two decimal places) ☑ The Least Squares Assumptions Y=Bo+B₁X+u, i = 1,..., n, where 1. The error term u; has conditional mean zero given X;: E (u;|X;) = 0; 2. (Y;, X¡), i = 1,..., n, are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) draws from i their joint distribution; and 3. Large outliers are unlikely: X; and Y, have nonzero finite fourth moments.arrow_forward
- Asap pleasearrow_forwardTasks Exercise 1 Assess the following functions: 1. f(x)= x2+6x+2 2.f '(x)=10x-2x2+5 a. Find the stationary points. (5 marks) b. Determine whether the stationary point is a maximum or minimum. (5 marks) c. Draw the corresponding curves (5 marks)arrow_forwardProblem 2: The sales data over the last 10 years for the Acme Hardware Store are as follows: 2003 $230,000 2008 $526,000 2004 276,000 2009 605,000 2005 328,000 2010 690,000 2006 388,000 2011 779,000 2007 453,000 2012 873,000 1. Calculate the compound growth rate for the period of 2003 to 2012. 2. Based on your answer to part a, forecast sales for both 2013 and 2014. 3. Now calculate the compound growth rate for the period of 2007 to 2012. 1. Based on your answer to part e, forecast sales for both 2013 and 2014. 5. What is the major reason for the differences in your answers to parts b and d? If you were to make your own projections, what would you forecast? (Drawing a graph is very helpful.)arrow_forward
- Exercise 4A firm has the following average cost: AC = 200 + 2Q – 36 Q Find the stationary point and determine if it is a maximum or a minimum.b. Find the marginal cost function.arrow_forwardExercise 4A firm has the following average cost: AC = 200 + 2Q – 36 Q Find the stationary point and determine if it is a maximum or a minimum.b. Find the marginal cost function.arrow_forwardExercise 2A firm has the following short-run production function: Q = 30L2 -0.5L3a. Make a table with two columns: Production and Labour b. Add a third column to the table with the marginal product of labour c. Graph the values that you estimated for the production function and the marginal product oflabour Exercise 3A Firm has the following production function: Q= 20L-0.4L2a. Using differential calculus find the unit of labour that maximizes the production. b. Estimate function of Marginal product of labor c. Obtain the Average product of labor. d. Find the point at which the Marginal Product of Labour is equal to the Average Product of Labour.arrow_forward
- Problem 3 You have the following data for the last 12 months' sales for the PRQ Corporation (in thousands of dollars): January 500 July 610 February 520 August 620 March 520 September 580 April 510 October 550 May 530 November 510 June 580 December 480 1. Calculate a 3-month centered moving average. 2. Use this moving average to forecast sales for January of next year. 3. If you were asked to forecast January and February sales for next year, would you be confident of your forecast using the preceding moving averages? Why or why not? expect? Explain.arrow_forwardProblem 5 The MNO Corporation is preparing for its stockholder meeting on May 15, 2013. It sent out proxies to its stockholders on March 15 and asked stockholders who plan to attend the meeting to respond. To plan for a sufficient number of information packages to be distributed at the meeting, as well as for refreshments to be served, the company has asked you to forecast the number of attending stockholders. By April 15, 378 stockholders have expressed their intention to attend. You have available the following data for the last 6 years for total attendance at the stockholder meeting and the number of positive responses as of April 15: Year Positive Responses Attendance 2007 322 520 2008 301 550 2009 398 570 2010 421 600 2011 357 570 2012 452 650 1. What is your attendance forecast for the 2013 stockholder meeting? 2. Are there any other factors that could affect attendance, and thus make your forecast inac- curate?arrow_forwardProblem 4 Office Enterprises (OE) produces a line of metal office file cabinets. The company's economist, having investigated a large number of past data, has established the following equation of demand for these cabinets: Q=10,000+6013-100P+50C Q=Annual number of cabinets sold B = Index of nonresidential construction P = Average price per cabinet charged by OE C=Average price per cabinet charged by OE's closest competitor It is expected that next year's nonresidential construction index will stand at 160, OE's average price will be $40, and the competitor's average price will be $35. 1. Forecast next year's sales. 2. What will be the effect if the competitor lowers its price to 832? If it raises its price to $36? 3. What will happen if OE reacts to the decrease mentioned in part b by lowering its price to $37? 4. If the index forecast was wrong, and it turns out to be only 140 next year, what will be the effect on OE's sales? If not, what does it measure?arrow_forward
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, IncPrinciples of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781285165875Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStaxEconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning





