Microeconomics
Microeconomics
21st Edition
ISBN: 9781259915727
Author: Campbell R. McConnell, Stanley L. Brue, Sean Masaki Flynn Dr.
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 24, Problem 3P

Subpart (a):

To determine

The preventive health care cost effectiveness.

Subpart (a):

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 3P

The total cost of 100 tests is $10,000.  The total future medical expense averted is $15,000. The medical expense saved after setting up of the screening system is $5,000.

Explanation of Solution

The preventive health care measures are those medical precautionary measures which help the people to stay healthy and free from diseases. The screening system helps the people to easily identify and detect various diseases in their early stages which will help them to treat the diseases easily and affordably without much hassle.

The cost of one screening test is $100 according to the given information and the number of persons taking the screening test is 100. Thus, the total cost of taking the medical screening test can be calculated by multiplying the cost per screening test with the total number of persons taking the screening test as follows:

Total expense of screening test=Per test cost×Total number of persons=100×100=10,000

Thus, the total expense of 100 screening tests is $10,000.

The given percentage of persons having the test result positive is 15%. Thus, the total number of persons having positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the total number of persons with the given percentage as follows:

No. of persons having positive results=Total no. of persons×Percentage of positiev results=100×0.15=15

Thus, there will be 15 persons having the positive results from the screening test.

The amount of the future medical expense saved by the individual when the test result is positive is $1,000. Thus, the total future medical expense that can be saved by the people having the positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the per person medical expense saved with the total number of persons having positive test results as follows:

Total medical expense saved=Per person savings×Total no. of persons =1,000×15=15,000

Thus, the total future medical expense saved by the persons having the positive test results is $15,000.

The cost of setting up the screening system is $10,000 and the total future medical expense saved is $15,000. Thus, the net future medical expense saved can be calculated by subtracting the cost of setting up the screening system from the total medical expense saved as follows:

Net medical expense saved=Total medical expense savedCost ofd setting screening =15,00010,000=5,000

Thus, the net medical expense saved after reducing the cost of setting up the screening test is $5,000.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Preventive health care: They are the measures taken in order to prevent the occurrence of a disease rather than treatment of a disease.

Sub part (b):

To determine

The net medical expense loss after reducing the cost of screening test.

Sub part (b):

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 3P

The total cost of 100 tests is $10,000.  The total future medical expense averted is $5,000. The medical expense lost after setting up of the screening system is -$5,000.

Explanation of Solution

The cost of one screening test is $100 according to the given information and the number of persons taking the screening test is 100. Thus, the total cost of taking the medical screening test can be calculated by multiplying the cost per screening test with the total number of persons taking the screening test as follows:

Total expense of screening test=Per test cost×Total number of persons=100×100=10,000

Thus, the total expense for 100 screening tests is $10,000.

The given percentage of persons having the test result as positive is 5%. Thus, the total number of persons having positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the total number of persons with the given percentage as follows:

No. of persons having positive results=Total no. of persons×Percentage of positiev results=100×0.05=5

Thus, there will be 5 persons having the positive results from the screening test.

The amount of the future medical expense saved by the individual when the test result is positive is $1,000. Thus, the total future medical expense saved by the people having the positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the per person medical expense saved with the total number of persons having positive test results as follows:

Total medical expense saved=Per person savings×Total no. of persons =1,000×5=5,000

Thus, the total future medical expense saved by the persons having the positive test results is $5,000.

The cost of setting up the screening system is $10,000 and the total future medical expense saved is $5,000. Thus, the net future medical expense saved can be calculated by subtracting the cost of setting up the screening system from the total medical expense saved as follows:

Net medical expense saved=Total medical expense savedCost ofd setting screening =5,00010,000=5,000

Since the result is having a negative sign, it shows that the expense of setting up the screening system is higher than the benefit received from the use of the screening system. Thus, the net result is a loss. Thus, the net medical expense loss after reducing the cost of setting up the screening test is -$5,000.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
1. After the reopening of borders with mainland China following the COVID-19 lockdown, residents living near the border now have the option to shop for food on either side. In Hong Kong, the cost of food is at its listed price, while across the border in mainland China, the price is only half that of Hong Kong's. A recent report indicates a decline in food sales in Hong Kong post-reopening. ** Diagrams need not be to scale; Focus on accurately representing the relevant concepts and relationships rather than the exact proportions. (a) Using a diagram, explain why Hong Kong's food sales might have dropped after the border reopening. Assume that consumers are indifferent between purchasing food in Hong Kong or mainland China, and therefore, their indifference curves have a slope of one like below. Additionally, consider that there are no transport costs and the daily food budget for consumers is identical whether they shop in Hong Kong or mainland China. I 3. 14 (b) In response to the…
2. Health Food Company is a well-known global brand that specializes in healthy and organic food products. One of their main products is organic chicken, which they source from small farmers in the area. Health Food Company is the sole buyer of organic chicken in the market. (a) In the context of the organic chicken industry, what type of market structure is Health Food Company operating in? (b) Using a diagram, explain how the identified market structure affects the input pricing and output decisions of Health Food Company. Specifically, include the relevant curves and any key points such as the profit-maximizing price and quantity. () (c) How can encouraging small chicken farmers to form bargaining associations help improve their trade terms? Explain how this works by drawing on the graph in answer (b) to illustrate your answer.
2. Suppose that a farmer has two ways to produce his crop. He can use a low-polluting technology with the marginal cost curve MCL or a high polluting technology with the marginal cost curve MCH. If the farmer uses the high-polluting technology, for each unit of quantity produced, one unit of pollution is also produced. Pollution causes pollution damages that are valued at $E per unit. The good produced can be sold in the market for $P per unit. P 1 MCH 0 Q₁ MCL Q2 E a. b. C. If there are no restrictions on the firm's choices, which technology will the farmer use and what quantity will he produce? Explain, referring to the area identified in the figure Given your response in part a, is it socially efficient for there to be no restriction on production? Explain, referring to the area identified in the figure If the government restricts production to Q1, what technology would the farmer choose? Would a socially efficient outcome be achieved? Explain, referring to the area identified in…
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
EBK HEALTH ECONOMICS AND POLICY
Economics
ISBN:9781337668279
Author:Henderson
Publisher:YUZU
Text book image
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Text book image
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781285165875
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:9781947172364
Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:OpenStax
Text book image
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Macroeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781337617390
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning