
a.
The ratio of per capita
Introduction: Real per capita GDP is the total value of goods and services produced in a country within a year. It is in real terms and adjusted for inflation by divide it to the total number of people. It is used to compare the relative performance and standard of living of people between countries and overtime.
The average annual growth rate is the average increase in the value of a variable over a specified period of time.

Explanation of Solution
i.
ForMiddle-income to high-income countries, the ratio of per capita GDP in 2012 is as follows:
The formula to calculate the ratio of Middle- income to high-income countries GDP is:
Substitute $2,730 for the value of real GDP of middle-income countries and$31,372 for high-income countries in the above formula,
Thus, the ratio of per capita GDP in 2012 of middle to high income is 0.087or 8.7%.
ii.
For Low-income to high-income countries, the ratio of per capita GDP in 2012 is as follows:
The formula to calculate the ratio of Low- income to high-income countries GDP is:
Substitute $422 forthe value of real GDP of Low-income countries and$31,372 for high-income countriesin the above formula,
Thus, the ratio of per capita GDP in 2012 of low to high income is 0.013or 1.3%.
iii.
For Low-income to middle-income countries, the ratio of per capita GDP in 2012 is as follows:
The formula to calculate the ratio of Low- income to middle-income countries GDP is:
Substitute $422 forthe value of real GDP of Low-income countries and$2,730 for middle-income countries in the above formula,
Thus, the ratio of per capita GDP in 2012 of low to middle income is 0.155.or 15.5%.
b.
The number of years low income and middle income countries will take to double their per capita GDP according to the Rule of 70.
Introduction: Rule of 70, a mathematical formula that calculates the number of years to double the country’s real GDP per capita. It can only be applied to a positive growth rate this means it is not possible to determine the number of years taken to double the real GDP per capita when the growth rate of the country is negative.

Explanation of Solution
The formula of Rule of 70 is as follows:
For Low-income countries to double real per capita GDP:
Substitute 3.2% for an annual growth rate of real GDP for low-income countriesin the above formula,
Thus, low income countries will take 21.9 years to double the real GDP per capita.
For Middle-income countries to double real per capita GDP:
Substitute 4.7% annual growth rate of real GDP for middle-income countries is in the above formula.
Thus, Middle income countries will take 14.9years to double real GDP per capita.
c .
The per capita GDP of each of the regions in 2076.

Explanation of Solution
In 2076, real per capita GDP of each of the regions are as follows:
According to the Rule of 70, for high income countries, real GDP per capita will be double in 64 years to $62,744.
In 2076, middle income countries real GDP per capita will be four times approx in 64 years So, projected per capita real GDP for middle income countries is
In 2076, low income countries real GDP per capita will be three times approx. hence, projected per capita real GDP for low- income countries are
d.
Ratio of per capita real GDP in 2076 of Middle to high –income, low to high-income and low to middle income countries.

Explanation of Solution
i.
The ratio of per capita GDP in 2076 of middle to high income countries is as follows:
The formula to calculate the ratio of Middle- income to high-income countries GDP is:
Substitute $43,680 for the value of real GDP of middle-income countries and$62,744 for high-income countries in the above formula,
Thus, the ratio of per capita GDP in 2076 of middle to high-income is 0.696 or 69.6%.
ii.
For Low-income to high-income countries, the ratio of per capita GDP in 2076 is as follows:
The formula to calculate the ratio of Low- income to high-income countries GDP is:
Substitute $3,376 value of real GDP of Low-income countries and$62,744 for high-income countriesin the above formula,
Thus, the ratio of per capita GDP in 2076 of low to high-income is 0.0538 or 5.38%.
iii.
For Low-income to middle-income countries, the ratio of per capita GDP in 2076 is as follows:
The formula to calculate the ratio of Low- income to middle-income countries GDP is:
Substitute $3,376 for the value of real GDP of Low-income countries and $43,680 for middle-income countries in the above formula,
Thus, the ratio of per capita GDP in 2076 of low to middle income is 0.077.or 7.7%.
e.
To compare the ratio of real GDP per capita of middle, low and high-income countries in 2012 and 2076.

Explanation of Solution
Both the low- income countries and the middle- income countries real GDP per capita as in 2012 have improved in 2076 relative to the high income countries due to their higher growth rates.
Low-income countries real GDP per capita have increased three times and middle-income countries have improved four times. This suggests that economic inequality tends to be lower. However, at the same time, middle-income countries grew faster than the low income countries and the inequality between the two regions widened.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- Can you please help with this one. Some economists argue that taxing consumption is more efficient than taxing income. Following the same argument, the minister of finance of a country introduced a new tax for sugar based products “sugar tax” to promote healthy eating in the economy. Please use relevant diagrams to explain the impact of the tax on consumers, producers and the tax revenue when sugar is elastic and inelastic.arrow_forwardprofit maximizing and loss minamization fire dragon co mindtaparrow_forwardProblem 3 You are given the following demand for European luxury automobiles: Q=1,000 P-0.5.2/1.6 where P-Price of European luxury cars PA = Price of American luxury cars P, Price of Japanese luxury cars I= Annual income of car buyers Assume that each of the coefficients is statistically significant (i.e., that they passed the t-test). On the basis of the information given, answer the following questions 1. Comment on the degree of substitutability between European and American luxury cars and between European and Japanese luxury cars. Explain some possible reasons for the results in the equation. 2. Comment on the coefficient for the income variable. Is this result what you would expect? Explain. 3. Comment on the coefficient of the European car price variable. Is that what you would expect? Explain.arrow_forward
- Problem 2: A manufacturer of computer workstations gathered average monthly sales figures from its 56 branch offices and dealerships across the country and estimated the following demand for its product: Q=+15,000-2.80P+150A+0.3P+0.35Pm+0.2Pc (5,234) (1.29) (175) (0.12) (0.17) (0.13) R²=0.68 SER 786 F=21.25 The variables and their assumed values are P = Price of basic model = 7,000 Q==Quantity A = Advertising expenditures (in thousands) = 52 P = Average price of a personal computer = 4,000 P. Average price of a minicomputer = 15,000 Pe Average price of a leading competitor's workstation = 8,000 1. Compute the elasticities for each variable. On this basis, discuss the relative impact that each variable has on the demand. What implications do these results have for the firm's marketing and pricing policies? 2. Conduct a t-test for the statistical significance of each variable. In each case, state whether a one-tail or two-tail test is required. What difference, if any, does it make to…arrow_forwardYou are the manager of a large automobile dealership who wants to learn more about the effective- ness of various discounts offered to customers over the past 14 months. Following are the average negotiated prices for each month and the quantities sold of a basic model (adjusted for various options) over this period of time. 1. Graph this information on a scatter plot. Estimate the demand equation. What do the regression results indicate about the desirability of discounting the price? Explain. Month Price Quantity Jan. 12,500 15 Feb. 12,200 17 Mar. 11,900 16 Apr. 12,000 18 May 11,800 20 June 12,500 18 July 11,700 22 Aug. 12,100 15 Sept. 11,400 22 Oct. 11,400 25 Nov. 11,200 24 Dec. 11,000 30 Jan. 10,800 25 Feb. 10,000 28 2. What other factors besides price might be included in this equation? Do you foresee any difficulty in obtaining these additional data or incorporating them in the regression analysis?arrow_forwardsimple steps on how it should look like on excelarrow_forward
- Consider options on a stock that does not pay dividends.The stock price is $100 per share, and the risk-free interest rate is 10%.Thestock moves randomly with u=1.25and d=1/u Use Excel to calculate the premium of a10-year call with a strike of $100.arrow_forwardCompute the Fourier sine and cosine transforms of f(x) = e.arrow_forwardDon't use ai to answer I will report you answerarrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





