To find: The value of x and s for the insulin concentrations in the two types of mice.
To test: Whether there is a significant difference in the
To check: The P-value confirm the claim in the report that
Answer to Problem 24.63SE
The mean for Wild type is 59 and the mean for
The value of s for Wild type is 2.85.
The value of s for
The conclusion is that there is a significant difference in the mean insulin concentrations in the two types of mice.
Yes, the P-value confirm the claim in the report that
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
The data shows that the insulin concentrations in the two types of mice.
In the given information,
Calculation:
Mean:
From the information in Exercise 62, the mean for Wild type is 59 and the mean for
Standard deviation for Wild type:
Thus, the value of s for Wild type is 2.85.
Standard deviation for
Thus, the value of s for
PLAN:
Check whether or not there is a significant difference in the mean insulin concentrations in the two types of mice.
State the test hypotheses.
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
SOLVE:
Test statistic and P-value:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to obtain test statistic and P-value using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > 2-Sample t.
- Choose Summarized data.
- In first, enter
Sample size as 10, Mean as 5.9, Standard deviation as 2.85. - In second, enter Sample size as 10, Mean as 0.75, Standard deviation as 0.632.
- Choose Options.
- In Confidence level, enter 95.
- In Alternative, select not equal.
- Click OK in all the dialogue boxes.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the MINITAB output, the value of the t-statistic is 5.58 and the P-value is 0.000.
CONCLUDE:
The P-value is 0.000 and the significance level is 0.05.
Here, the P-value is less than the significance level.
That is,
Therefore, by the rejection rule, it can be concluded that there is evidence to reject
Thus, there is a significant difference in the mean insulin concentrations in the two types of mice.
Justification:
From the MINITAB output, the P-value is 0.000. Hence, the P-value confirm the claim in the report that
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 24 Solutions
The Basic Practice of Statistics
- T1.4: Let ẞ(G) be the minimum size of a vertex cover, a(G) be the maximum size of an independent set and m(G) = |E(G)|. (i) Prove that if G is triangle free (no induced K3) then m(G) ≤ a(G)B(G). Hints - The neighborhood of a vertex in a triangle free graph must be independent; all edges have at least one end in a vertex cover. (ii) Show that all graphs of order n ≥ 3 and size m> [n2/4] contain a triangle. Hints - you may need to use either elementary calculus or the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality.arrow_forwardWe consider the one-period model studied in class as an example. Namely, we assumethat the current stock price is S0 = 10. At time T, the stock has either moved up toSt = 12 (with probability p = 0.6) or down towards St = 8 (with probability 1−p = 0.4).We consider a call option on this stock with maturity T and strike price K = 10. Theinterest rate on the money market is zero.As in class, we assume that you, as a customer, are willing to buy the call option on100 shares of stock for $120. The investor, who sold you the option, can adopt one of thefollowing strategies: Strategy 1: (seen in class) Buy 50 shares of stock and borrow $380. Strategy 2: Buy 55 shares of stock and borrow $430. Strategy 3: Buy 60 shares of stock and borrow $480. Strategy 4: Buy 40 shares of stock and borrow $280.(a) For each of strategies 2-4, describe the value of the investor’s portfolio at time 0,and at time T for each possible movement of the stock.(b) For each of strategies 2-4, does the investor have…arrow_forwardNegate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forward
- Negate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forwardQuestion 6: Negate the following compound statements, using De Morgan's laws. A) If Alberta was under water entirely then there should be no fossil of mammals.arrow_forwardNegate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forward
- Characterize (with proof) all connected graphs that contain no even cycles in terms oftheir blocks.arrow_forwardLet G be a connected graph that does not have P4 or C3 as an induced subgraph (i.e.,G is P4, C3 free). Prove that G is a complete bipartite grapharrow_forwardProve sufficiency of the condition for a graph to be bipartite that is, prove that if G hasno odd cycles then G is bipartite as follows:Assume that the statement is false and that G is an edge minimal counterexample. That is, Gsatisfies the conditions and is not bipartite but G − e is bipartite for any edge e. (Note thatthis is essentially induction, just using different terminology.) What does minimality say aboutconnectivity of G? Can G − e be disconnected? Explain why if there is an edge between twovertices in the same part of a bipartition of G − e then there is an odd cyclearrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman