BASIC PRACTICE OF STATS-LL W/SAPLINGPLU
BASIC PRACTICE OF STATS-LL W/SAPLINGPLU
8th Edition
ISBN: 9781319216245
Author: Moore
Publisher: MAC HIGHER
bartleby

Videos

Question
Book Icon
Chapter 24, Problem 24.58SE

(a)

To determine

To construct: The stemplot for Diabetic Mice and Normal Mice.

To check: Whether it appears that potentials in the two groups differ in a systematic way or not.

(a)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 24.58SE

Stemplot for Diabetic Mice:

Output using the MINITAB software is given below:

BASIC PRACTICE OF STATS-LL W/SAPLINGPLU, Chapter 24, Problem 24.58SE , additional homework tip  1

Stemplot for Normal Mice:

Output using the MINITAB software is given below:

BASIC PRACTICE OF STATS-LL W/SAPLINGPLU, Chapter 24, Problem 24.58SE , additional homework tip  2

Yes, it appears that potentials in the two groups differ in a systematic way.

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

The data shows the measured the difference in electrical potential between the Diabetic Mice and Normal Mice.

Calculation:

Stemplot for Diabetic Mice:

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to construct Stemplot for Diabetic Mice by using the MINITAB software:

  • Choose Graph > Stem-and-Leaf.
  • In Graph variables, enter the column of Diabetic Mice.
  • Click OK.

Observation:

From Stemplot for Diabetic Mice, it is clear that the left side of the stemplot extended larger than the right side of the stemplot. Hence, the distribution of the Diabetic Mice is left-skewed with one low outlier.

Stemplot for Normal Mice:

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to construct Stemplot for Normal Mice by using the MINITAB software:

  • Choose Graph > Stem-and-Leaf.
  • In Graph variables, enter the column of Normal Mice.
  • Click OK.

Observation:

From Stemplot for Normal Mice, it is clear that the right side of the stemplot extended same as in the left side of the stemplot. Hence, the distribution of the Normal Mice is symmetric.

Justification:

From the Stemplot for Diabetic Mice and Normal Mice, it can be observed that the distribution of the two groups is symmetric without considering the outliers. Hence, it appears that potentials in the two groups differ in a systematic way.

(b)

To determine

To test: Whether there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups or not.

(b)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 24.58SE

The conclusion is that, there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups.

Explanation of Solution

Calculation:

PLAN:

Check whether or not there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups.

State the test hypotheses.

Null hypothesis:

H0:μ1=μ2

Alternative hypothesis:

Ha:μ1μ2

SOLVE:

Test statistic and P-value:

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to obtain test statistic and P-value using the MINITAB software:

  • Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > 2-Sample t.
  • Choose Sample in different columns.
  • In First, enter the column of Diabetic Mice.
  • In Second, enter the column of Normal Mice.
  • Choose Options.
  • In Confidence level, enter 95.
  • In Alternative, select not equal.
  • Click OK in all the dialogue boxes.

Output using the MINITAB software is given below:

BASIC PRACTICE OF STATS-LL W/SAPLINGPLU, Chapter 24, Problem 24.58SE , additional homework tip  3

From the MINITAB output, the value of the t-statistic is 3.08 and the P-value is 0.004.

CONCLUDE:

The P-value is 0.004 and the significance level is 0.05.

Here, the P-value is less than the significance level.

That is, 0.004(=P-value)<0.05(=α) .

Therefore, by the rejection rule, it can be concluded that there is evidence to reject H0 at α=0.05 .

Thus, there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups.

(c)

To determine

To test: Whether there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups or not.

To check: Whether the outlier affects the conclusion or not.

(c)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 24.58SE

The conclusion is that, there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups.

No, the outlier does not affect the conclusion.

Explanation of Solution

Calculation:

PLAN:

Check whether or not there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups.

State the test hypotheses.

Null hypothesis:

H0:μ1=μ2

Alternative hypothesis:

Ha:μ1μ2

SOLVE:

Test statistic and P-value:

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to obtain test statistic and P-value without outlier using the MINITAB software:

  • Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > 2-Sample t.
  • Choose Sample in different columns.
  • In First, enter the column of Diabetic Mice.
  • In Second, enter the column of Normal Mice.
  • Choose Options.
  • In Confidence level, enter 95.
  • In Alternative, select not equal.
  • Click OK in all the dialogue boxes.

Output using the MINITAB software is given below:

BASIC PRACTICE OF STATS-LL W/SAPLINGPLU, Chapter 24, Problem 24.58SE , additional homework tip  4

From the MINITAB output, the value of the t-statistic is 3.84 and the P-value is 0.000.

CONCLUDE:

The P-value is 0.000 and the significance level is 0.05.

Here, the P-value is less than the significance level.

That is, 0.000(=P-value)<0.05(=α) .

Therefore, by the rejection rule, it can be concluded that there is evidence to reject H0 at α=0.05 .

Thus, there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups.

Justification:

From the results, it can be observed that the conclusions for inference with outlier and without outlier are same. Hence, the outlier does not affect the conclusion.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Suppose you are gambling on a roulette wheel. Each time the wheel is spun, the result is one of the outcomes 0, 1, and so on through 36. Of these outcomes, 18 are red, 18 are black, and 1 is green. On each spin you bet $5 that a red outcome will occur and $1 that the green outcome will occur. If red occurs, you win a net $4. (You win $10 from red and nothing from green.) If green occurs, you win a net $24. (You win $30 from green and nothing from red.) If black occurs, you lose everything you bet for a loss of $6. a.  Use simulation to generate 1,000 plays from this strategy. Each play should indicate the net amount won or lost. Then, based on these outcomes, calculate a 95% confidence interval for the total net amount won or lost from 1,000 plays of the game. (Round your answers to two decimal places and if your answer is negative value, enter "minus" sign.)   I worked out the Upper Limit, but I can't seem to arrive at the correct answer for the Lower Limit. What is the Lower Limit?…
Let us suppose we have some article reported on a study of potential sources of injury to equine veterinarians conducted at a university veterinary hospital. Forces on the hand were measured for several common activities that veterinarians engage in when examining or treating horses. We will consider the forces on the hands for two tasks, lifting and using ultrasound. Assume that both sample sizes are 6, the sample mean force for lifting was 6.2 pounds with standard deviation 1.5 pounds, and the sample mean force for using ultrasound was 6.4 pounds with standard deviation 0.3 pounds. Assume that the standard deviations are known. Suppose that you wanted to detect a true difference in mean force of 0.25 pounds on the hands for these two activities. Under the null hypothesis, 40 0. What level of type II error would you recommend here? = Round your answer to four decimal places (e.g. 98.7654). Use α = 0.05. β = 0.0594 What sample size would be required? Assume the sample sizes are to be…
Consider the hypothesis test Ho: 0 s² = = 4.5; s² = 2.3. Use a = 0.01. = σ against H₁: 6 > σ2. Suppose that the sample sizes are n₁ = 20 and 2 = 8, and that (a) Test the hypothesis. Round your answers to two decimal places (e.g. 98.76). The test statistic is fo = 1.96 The critical value is f = 6.18 Conclusion: fail to reject the null hypothesis at a = 0.01. (b) Construct the confidence interval on 02/2/622 which can be used to test the hypothesis: (Round your answer to two decimal places (e.g. 98.76).) 035

Chapter 24 Solutions

BASIC PRACTICE OF STATS-LL W/SAPLINGPLU

Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Statistics
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:John Wiley & Sons Inc
Text book image
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th...
Statistics
ISBN:9781305251809
Author:Jay L. Devore
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...
Statistics
ISBN:9781305504912
Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...
Statistics
ISBN:9780134683416
Author:Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:9781319042578
Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:W. H. Freeman
Text book image
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:9781319013387
Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:W. H. Freeman
Introduction to experimental design and analysis of variance (ANOVA); Author: Dr. Bharatendra Rai;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSFo1MwLoxU;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY