(a)
To construct: The stemplot for Diabetic Mice and Normal Mice.
To check: Whether it appears that potentials in the two groups differ in a systematic way or not.
(a)

Answer to Problem 24.58SE
Stemplot for Diabetic Mice:
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
Stemplot for Normal Mice:
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
Yes, it appears that potentials in the two groups differ in a systematic way.
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
The data shows the measured the difference in electrical potential between the Diabetic Mice and Normal Mice.
Calculation:
Stemplot for Diabetic Mice:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to construct Stemplot for Diabetic Mice by using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Graph > Stem-and-Leaf.
- In Graph variables, enter the column of Diabetic Mice.
- Click OK.
Observation:
From Stemplot for Diabetic Mice, it is clear that the left side of the stemplot extended larger than the right side of the stemplot. Hence, the distribution of the Diabetic Mice is left-skewed with one low outlier.
Stemplot for Normal Mice:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to construct Stemplot for Normal Mice by using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Graph > Stem-and-Leaf.
- In Graph variables, enter the column of Normal Mice.
- Click OK.
Observation:
From Stemplot for Normal Mice, it is clear that the right side of the stemplot extended same as in the left side of the stemplot. Hence, the distribution of the Normal Mice is symmetric.
Justification:
From the Stemplot for Diabetic Mice and Normal Mice, it can be observed that the distribution of the two groups is symmetric without considering the outliers. Hence, it appears that potentials in the two groups differ in a systematic way.
(b)
To test: Whether there is a significant difference in
(b)

Answer to Problem 24.58SE
The conclusion is that, there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
PLAN:
Check whether or not there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups.
State the test hypotheses.
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
SOLVE:
Test statistic and P-value:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to obtain test statistic and P-value using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > 2-Sample t.
- Choose Sample in different columns.
- In First, enter the column of Diabetic Mice.
- In Second, enter the column of Normal Mice.
- Choose Options.
- In Confidence level, enter 95.
- In Alternative, select not equal.
- Click OK in all the dialogue boxes.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the MINITAB output, the value of the t-statistic is 3.08 and the P-value is 0.004.
CONCLUDE:
The P-value is 0.004 and the significance level is 0.05.
Here, the P-value is less than the significance level.
That is,
Therefore, by the rejection rule, it can be concluded that there is evidence to reject
Thus, there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups.
(c)
To test: Whether there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups or not.
To check: Whether the outlier affects the conclusion or not.
(c)

Answer to Problem 24.58SE
The conclusion is that, there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups.
No, the outlier does not affect the conclusion.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
PLAN:
Check whether or not there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups.
State the test hypotheses.
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
SOLVE:
Test statistic and P-value:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to obtain test statistic and P-value without outlier using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > 2-Sample t.
- Choose Sample in different columns.
- In First, enter the column of Diabetic Mice.
- In Second, enter the column of Normal Mice.
- Choose Options.
- In Confidence level, enter 95.
- In Alternative, select not equal.
- Click OK in all the dialogue boxes.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the MINITAB output, the value of the t-statistic is 3.84 and the P-value is 0.000.
CONCLUDE:
The P-value is 0.000 and the significance level is 0.05.
Here, the P-value is less than the significance level.
That is,
Therefore, by the rejection rule, it can be concluded that there is evidence to reject
Thus, there is a significant difference in mean potentials between the two groups.
Justification:
From the results, it can be observed that the conclusions for inference with outlier and without outlier are same. Hence, the outlier does not affect the conclusion.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 24 Solutions
Basic Practice of Statistics (Instructor's)
- A special interest group reports a tiny margin of error (plus or minus 0.04 percent) for its online survey based on 50,000 responses. Is the margin of error legitimate? (Assume that the group’s math is correct.)arrow_forwardSuppose that 73 percent of a sample of 1,000 U.S. college students drive a used car as opposed to a new car or no car at all. Find an 80 percent confidence interval for the percentage of all U.S. college students who drive a used car.What sample size would cut this margin of error in half?arrow_forwardYou want to compare the average number of tines on the antlers of male deer in two nearby metro parks. A sample of 30 deer from the first park shows an average of 5 tines with a population standard deviation of 3. A sample of 35 deer from the second park shows an average of 6 tines with a population standard deviation of 3.2. Find a 95 percent confidence interval for the difference in average number of tines for all male deer in the two metro parks (second park minus first park).Do the parks’ deer populations differ in average size of deer antlers?arrow_forward
- Suppose that you want to increase the confidence level of a particular confidence interval from 80 percent to 95 percent without changing the width of the confidence interval. Can you do it?arrow_forwardA random sample of 1,117 U.S. college students finds that 729 go home at least once each term. Find a 98 percent confidence interval for the proportion of all U.S. college students who go home at least once each term.arrow_forwardSuppose that you make two confidence intervals with the same data set — one with a 95 percent confidence level and the other with a 99.7 percent confidence level. Which interval is wider?Is a wide confidence interval a good thing?arrow_forward
- Is it true that a 95 percent confidence interval means you’re 95 percent confident that the sample statistic is in the interval?arrow_forwardTines can range from 2 to upwards of 50 or more on a male deer. You want to estimate the average number of tines on the antlers of male deer in a nearby metro park. A sample of 30 deer has an average of 5 tines, with a population standard deviation of 3. Find a 95 percent confidence interval for the average number of tines for all male deer in this metro park.Find a 98 percent confidence interval for the average number of tines for all male deer in this metro park.arrow_forwardBased on a sample of 100 participants, the average weight loss the first month under a new (competing) weight-loss plan is 11.4 pounds with a population standard deviation of 5.1 pounds. The average weight loss for the first month for 100 people on the old (standard) weight-loss plan is 12.8 pounds, with population standard deviation of 4.8 pounds. Find a 90 percent confidence interval for the difference in weight loss for the two plans( old minus new) Whats the margin of error for your calculated confidence interval?arrow_forward
- A 95 percent confidence interval for the average miles per gallon for all cars of a certain type is 32.1, plus or minus 1.8. The interval is based on a sample of 40 randomly selected cars. What units represent the margin of error?Suppose that you want to decrease the margin of error, but you want to keep 95 percent confidence. What should you do?arrow_forward3. (i) Below is the R code for performing a X2 test on a 2×3 matrix of categorical variables called TestMatrix: chisq.test(Test Matrix) (a) Assuming we have a significant result for this procedure, provide the R code (including any required packages) for an appropriate post hoc test. (b) If we were to apply this technique to a 2 × 2 case, how would we adapt the code in order to perform the correct test? (ii) What procedure can we use if we want to test for association when we have ordinal variables? What code do we use in R to do this? What package does this command belong to? (iii) The following code contains the initial steps for a scenario where we are looking to investigate the relationship between age and whether someone owns a car by using frequencies. There are two issues with the code - please state these. Row3<-c(75,15) Row4<-c(50,-10) MortgageMatrix<-matrix(c(Row1, Row4), byrow=T, nrow=2, MortgageMatrix dimnames=list(c("Yes", "No"), c("40 or older","<40")))…arrow_forwardDescribe the situation in which Fisher’s exact test would be used?(ii) When do we use Yates’ continuity correction (with respect to contingencytables)?[2 Marks] 2. Investigate, checking the relevant assumptions, whether there is an associationbetween age group and home ownership based on the sample dataset for atown below:Home Owner: Yes NoUnder 40 39 12140 and over 181 59Calculate and evaluate the effect size.arrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman





