a.
To compute: The Sharpe ratios for the Miranda fund and the S&P 500.
Introduction:
Sharpe ratio: It is one of risk measurement ratios. When a performance of an investment has to be done and that too in comparison with a risk-free asset, Sharpe ratio is utilized.
a.
Answer to Problem 21PS
The Sharpe ratio for Mirinda Fund is 0.2216 and S&P 500 is -0.5568.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Risk-free interest rate=2%
One- year Trailing Returns | ||
Miranda Fund | S&P 500 | |
Return | 10.20% | -22.50% |
Standard deviation | 37.00% | 44.00% |
Beta | 1.10 | 1.00 |
Let us calculate the Sharpe ratio using the formula:
Let us now substitute the given values in the formula.
Mirinda Fund | S&P 500 | |
Sharpe Ratio |
Therefore, the Sharpe ratio for Mirinda Fund is 0.2216 and S&P 500 is -0.5568.
b.
To compute: The M2 measures for Miranda and S&P 500.
Introduction:
M2 measure: It is also termed as M-square measure. It is used to calculate the return which has to be adjusted for the risk associated with a portfolio along with benchmark.
b.
Answer to Problem 21PS
The M2 of Mirinda Fund (portfolio P) would be 34.25%.
Explanation of Solution
Giveninformation:
Risk-free interest rate=2%
One- year Trailing Returns | ||
Miranda Fund | S&P 500 | |
Return | 10.20% | -22.50% |
Standard deviation | 37.00% | 44.00% |
Beta | 1.10 | 1.00 |
The formula to calculate the M2is as follows:-
Where,
One point to be kept in mind is that to get the position of volatility which is similar to the market, the funds have to be combined with the T-Bills.
Let us now calculate the adjusted portfolio.
Now, we have to calculate the position in T-Bills:
Therefore, when we check for the weight of Mirinda fund in adjusted portfolio, it will be 1.1892 and when amount is borrowed at a rate which is equal to 0.1892 will result in risk-free rate.
Therefore, the end result would be as follows:
Volatility of return of portfolio=Volatility in return on market index.
Now, let us calculate the M2of Mirinda Fund:
This value has to be converted into percentage by multiplying it with 100.
Therefore, the M2 of Mirinda Fund (portfolio P) would be 34.25%
c.
To compute: The Treynor’s measure ratios for the Miranda fund and the S&P 500.
Introduction:
Treynor’s ratio: It is also termed as Treynor’s measure in some instances. It is one of the measures used to calculate the risk adjusted return. It calculates the returns on the basis of systematic risk which differentiates this ratio with other related ratios.
c.
Answer to Problem 21PS
The Sharpe ratio for Mirinda Fund is 7.45% and S&P 500 is -24.50%.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Risk-free interest rate=2%
One- year Trailing Returns | ||
Miranda Fund | S&P 500 | |
Return | 10.20% | -22.50% |
Standard deviation | 37.00% | 44.00% |
Beta | 1.10 | 1.00 |
The formula to be used to calculate the Treynor’s measure is as follows:
Where
RP=Return on portfolio
RF= Risk free
ß = Systematic risk
Mirinda Fund | S&P 500 | |
Treynor’s measure |
Therefore, the Sharpe ratio for Mirinda Fund is 7.45% and S&P 500 is -24.50%.
d.
To compute: The Jenson measure for the Miranda Fund.
Introduction:
Jenson Measure: This measure is used to calculate the average rate of return. The return calculated is on the investment made in a portfolio.
d.
Answer to Problem 21PS
The Jenson measure of Mirinda fund is 35.15%.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Risk-free interest rate=2%
One- year Trailing Returns | ||
Miranda Fund | S&P 500 | |
Return | 10.20% | -22.50% |
Standard deviation | 37.00% | 44.00% |
Beta | 1.10 | 1.00 |
The formula is as follows:
Therefore, the Jenson measure of Mirinda fund is 35.15%.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 24 Solutions
GEN COMBO LOOSELEAF INVESTMENTS; CONNECT ACCESS CARD
- Bart Campbell, CFA, is a portfolio manager who has recently met with a prospective client, Jane Black. After conducting a survey market line (SML) performance analysis using the Dow Jones Industrial Average as her market proxy, Black claims that her portfolio has experienced superior performance. Campbell uses the capital asset pricing model as an investment performance measure and finds that Black’s portfolio plots below the SML. Campbell concludes that Black’s apparent superior performance is a function of an incorrectly specified market proxy, not superior investment management. Justify Campbell’s conclusion by addressing the likely effects of an incorrectly specified market proxy on both beta and the slope of the SML.arrow_forwardCarol Harrod is the investment officer for a $100 million U.S. pension fund. The fixed-income portion of the portfolio is actively managed, and a substantial portion of the fund’s large capitalization U.S. equity portfolio is indexed and managed by Webb Street Advisors.Harrod has been impressed with the investment results of Webb Street’s equity index strategy and is considering asking Webb Street to index a portion of the actively managed fixed-income portfolio.a. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of bond indexing relative to active bond management.b. Webb Street manages indexed bond portfolios. Discuss how an indexed bond portfolio is constructed under stratified sampling (cellular) methods.c. Describe the main source of tracking error for the cellular method.arrow_forwarda. John Wilson is a portfolio manager at Austin & Associates. For all of his clients, Wilson manages portfolios that lie on the Markowitz efficient frontier. Wilson asks Mary Regan, CFA, a managing director at Austin, to review the portfolios of two of his clients, the Eagle Manufacturing Company and the Rainbow Life Insurance Co. The expected returns of the two portfolios are substantially different. Regan determines that the Rainbow portfolio is virtually identical to the market portfolio and concludes that the Rainbow portfolio must be superior to the Eagle portfolio. Do you agree or disagree with Regan’s conclusion that the Rainbow portfolio is superior to the Eagle portfolio? Justify your response with reference to the capital market line.b. Wilson remarks that the Rainbow portfolio has a higher expected return because it has greater nonsystematic risk than Eagle’s portfolio. Define nonsystematic risk and explain why you agree or disagree with Wilson’s remark.arrow_forward
- Fund F has been investing in stocks and bonds. You are evaluating the performance of Fund F by comparing its performance with the performance of an appropriate benchmark portfolio B. The performance and weights of F and B over the last year are given in the table below: Asset Class Weight in F Weight in B 0.6 Stocks 0.5 Bonds 0.5 Attribute the performance of Fund F against benchmark portfolio B in the stock class. What is the attribution due to the asset allocation in the stock class? What is the attribution due to the security selection in the stock class? 0.4 Return from F O a. -0.005, -0.008 O b. 0.003; 0.004 O c. 0.012, 0.008 O d. 0.008; 0.012 10% Return from B 3% 8% 5%arrow_forwardPrimo Management Co. is looking at how best to evaluate the performance of its managers. Primo has been hearing more and more about benchmark portfolios and is interested in trying this approach. As such, the company hired Sally Jones, CFA, as a consultant to educate the managers on the best methods for constructing a benchmark portfolio, how to choose the best benchmark, whether the style of the fund under management matters, and what they should do with their global funds in terms of benchmarking. For the sake of discussion, Jones put together some comparative 2-year performance numbers that relate to Primo's current domestic funds under management and a potential benchmark. Style Category weight of Primo Large-cap growth Mid-cap growth 0.15 Small-cap growth 0.60 0.25 weight of Benchmark 0.50 0.40 0.10 return of Primo return of Benchmark (%) (%) 17 23 19 14 26 17 Calculate the contribution to performance of the pure sector allocation. Round your answer to two decimal place. Do not…arrow_forwardIn the chapter opener, you learned that Bill Miller's investment performance was alternating between the very top and the very bottom of his profession. What aspect of his investment strategy would lead you to expect that his performance might exhibit greater volatility than that of other mutual funds? The following table shows the annual performance from 2009 to 2012 of Miller's Opportunity fund and the S&P 500 index. Opportunity Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 S&P 500 Fund Return 76.0% 16.6% -34.9% 39.6% Return 26.5% 15.1% 2.11% 16.0% Calculate the average annual return of the Opportunity fund and the S&P 500. Which performed better over this period? If you had invested $1,000 in each in- vestment at the beginning of 2009, how much money would you have in each investment at the end of 2012? Calculate the standard deviation of the Opportu- nity fund's return and those of the S&P 500. Which is more volatile?arrow_forward
- ABC has a substantial number of clients who wish to own a mutual fund portfolio that closely matches the performance of the S&P 500 stock index. A manager at ABC has selected five mutual funds (shown in the table below) that will be considered for inclusion in the portfolio. The manager must decide what percentage of the portfolio should be invested in each mutual fund. Based on the given information, please create your spreadsheet model and find the optimal portfolio. Please submit your business model and solution. Table: Five Mutual Funds and Annual Returns Mutual Fund Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 International Stock $15.64 $17.62 $5.80 $3.13 Large-Cap Blend $15.31 $18.77 -$5.06 $1.75 Mid-Cap Blend $18.74 $18.43 $6.28 -$1.04 Small-Cap Blend $14.19 $12.37 $1.92 $7.32 Intermediate Bond $7.88 $9.45 -$1.56 $3.31 S&P 500 $13.00 $12.00 $7.00 $1.50arrow_forwardPrimo Management Company is looking at how best to evaluate the performance of its managers. Primo has been hearing more and more about benchmark portfolios and is interested in trying this approach. As such, the company hired Sally Jones, CFA, as a consultant to educate the managers on the best methods for constructing a benchmark portfolio, how to choose the best benchmark, whether the style of the fund under management matters, and what they should do with their global funds in terms of benchmarking. For the sake of discussion, Jones put together some comparative two-year performance numbers that relate to Primo’s current domestic funds under management and a potential benchmark. Style Category Weight Return Primo Benchmark Primo Benchmark Large-cap growth 0.60 0.50 17% 16% Mid-cap growth 0.15 0.40 24 26 Small-cap growth 0.25 0.10 20 18 As part of her analysis, Jones also takes a look at one of Primo’s global funds. In this particular portfolio, Primo is invested…arrow_forwardPrimo Management Company is looking at how best to evaluate the performance of its managers. Primo has been hearing more and more about benchmark portfolios and is interested in trying this approach. As such, the company hired Sally Jones, CFA, as a consultant to educate the managers on the best methods for constructing a benchmark portfolio, how to choose the best benchmark, whether the style of the fund under management matters, and what they should do with their global funds in terms of benchmarking. For the sake of discussion, Jones put together some comparative two-year performance numbers that relate to Primo’s current domestic funds under management and a potential benchmark. Style Category Weight Return Primo Benchmark Primo Benchmark Large-cap growth 0.60 0.50 17% 16% Mid-cap growth 0.15 0.40 24 26 Small-cap growth 0.25 0.10 20 18 As part of her analysis, Jones also takes a look at one of Primo’s global funds. In this particular portfolio, Primo is invested…arrow_forward
- Primo Management Company is looking at how best to evaluate the performance of its managers. Primo has been hearing more and more about benchmark portfolios and is interested in trying this approach. As such, the company hired Sally Jones, CFA, as a consultant to educate the managers on the best methods for constructing a benchmark portfolio, how to choose the best benchmark, whether the style of the fund under management matters, and what they should do with their global funds in terms of benchmarking. For the sake of discussion, Jones put together some comparative two-year performance numbers that relate to Primo’s current domestic funds under management and a potential benchmark. Style Category Weight Return Primo Benchmark Primo Benchmark Large-cap growth 0.60 0.50 17% 16% Mid-cap growth 0.15 0.40 24 26 Small-cap growth 0.25 0.10 20 18 As part of her analysis, Jones also takes a look at one of Primo’s global funds. In this particular portfolio, Primo is invested…arrow_forwardMansukharrow_forwardAs the chief investment officer for a money management firm specializing in taxable individual investors, you are trying to establish a strategic asset allocation for two different clients. You have established that Ms. A has a risk-tolerance factor of 8, while Mr. B has a risk-tolerance factor of 27. The characteristics for four model portfolios follow: ASSET MIX Bond 93% 75 32 13 Portfolio 1 2 3 4 Stock 7% 25 GB 87 a. Calculate the expected utility of each prospective portfolio for each of the two clients. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places. 1 2 3 Portfolio Ms. A ER 8% 9 10 11 b. Which portfolio represents the optimal strategic allocation for Ms. A? Which portfolio is optimal for Mr. B? Portfollo-Select-represents the optimal strategic allocation for Ms. A. Portfolio Select is the optimal allocation for Mr. B. c. For Ms. A, what level of risk tolerance would leave her indifferent between having Portfolio 1 or Portfolio 2 as her strategic…arrow_forward
- Essentials Of InvestmentsFinanceISBN:9781260013924Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.Publisher:Mcgraw-hill Education,
- Foundations Of FinanceFinanceISBN:9780134897264Author:KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. WilliamPublisher:Pearson,Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou...FinanceISBN:9781337395250Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. HoustonPublisher:Cengage LearningCorporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i...FinanceISBN:9780077861759Author:Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan ProfessorPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education