Case s ummar y:A company POM is making and selling pomegranate-based products. The company in ads claimed that it will prevent or reduce heart disease and cancer on daily consumption. Federal Trade Commission(FTC) charged the company for misleading and misrepresentation ads. The company was barred for future ads and affirmed that other advertisements of the company are deceptive. The court affirmed that the benefits in its product required Randomized Controlled Trials result. The court ordered that benefits in Ads should be supported by the evidence to the consumer in a non-misleading way.
To find:The validity of arguments advanced by the company POM.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 24 Solutions
Bundle: The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th + Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card
- Please explain the solution to this general accounting problem with accurate explanations.arrow_forwardQuartz Manufacturing completes job #715, which has a standard of 480 labor hours at a standard rate of $19.50 per hour. The job was completed in 510 hours and the actual average labor rate was $20.10 per hour. What is the labor rate variance? (A negative number indicates a favorable variance and a positive number indicates an unfavorable variance.)arrow_forwardI need help with this general accounting question using the proper accounting approach.arrow_forward
- If a company has an accounts receivable turnover of 9.5 times per year, and net sales are $100,000, what is the number of days' sales in receivables (also known as the average collection period)?arrow_forward1. Suppose that the two nations face the following benefits of pollution, B, and costs of abatement, C: BN = 10, Bs = 7; CN = 5, Cs = 4. Further assume that if the nation chooses to abate pollution, it still receives the benefits of pollution but now must pay the cost of abatement as well. a. Identify the payoffs that accrue to each nation under the four different possible outcomes of the game and present these payoffs in the normal form of the game. b. Recall that the term dominant strategy defines the condition that a player in a game would prefer to play that strategy (in this case either pollute or abate) regardless of the strategy chosen by the other player in the game. Does either nation have a dominant strategy in this game? If so, what is it? c. Identify the Nash equilibria, or non-cooperative equilibria, of this game.arrow_forwardwhat is the profit margin ? give me answer fast please general accountingarrow_forward
