
Concept explainers
(a)
Section 1:
To find: The delayed percentage of all Alaska Airlines flights.
(a)

Answer to Problem 18E
Solution: The percentage of delayed Alaska Airlines flights is 13.3%.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Form the 2-way table for the number of delayed flights and on time flights for Alaska Airlines to determine the percentage for all the delayed Alaska Airlines flights. The 2-way table for Alaska Airlines is obtained as:
Airport | Alaska Airlines | ||
On time | Delayed | Total | |
Los Angeles | 497 | 62 | 559 |
Phoenix | 221 | 12 | 233 |
San Diego | 212 | 20 | 232 |
San Francisco | 503 | 102 | 605 |
Seattle | 1841 | 305 | 2146 |
Total | 3274 | 501 | 3775 |
There are 501 delayed flights out of total number of 3775 Alaska Airlines flights. So, the percentage of all Alaska Airlines delayed flights is calculated as:
Section 2:
To find: The delayed percentage of all America West Airlines flights.
Solution: The percentage of delayed America West Airlines flights is 10.9%.
Explanation:
Calculation:
Form the 2-way table for the number of delayed flights and on time flights for America West Airlines to determine the percentage for all the delayed America West Airlines flights. The two-way table for America West Airlines is obtained as:
Airport | America West Airlines | ||
On time | Delayed | Total | |
Los Angeles | 694 | 117 | 811 |
Phoenix | 4840 | 415 | 5255 |
San Diego | 383 | 65 | 448 |
San Francisco | 320 | 129 | 449 |
Seattle | 201 | 61 | 262 |
Total | 6438 | 787 | 7225 |
There are 787 delayed flights out of total number of 7225 America West Airlines flights. So, the percentage of all America West Airlines delayed flights is calculated as:
(b)
Section 1:
To find: The percentage of flights delayed at five airports for Alaska Airlines.
(b)
Section 1:

Answer to Problem 18E
Solution: The percentage of flights delayed at five airports for Alaska Airlines is obtained as:
Airport | Alaska Airlines Delayed percentage |
Los Angeles | 11.1% |
Phoenix | 5.2% |
San Diego | 8.6% |
San Francisco | 16.9% |
Seattle | 14.2% |
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Use the two-way table obtained in previous part for delay of Alaska Airlines flight to determine the percentages of delayed flights at each one of the five airports.
From the obtained two-way table, the number of delayed flights of Alaska Airlines for Los Angeles airport is 62 flights from a total of 559 flights that arrive at the Los Angeles airport. So, the percentage of flights delayed at Los Angeles airport for Alaska Airlines is calculated as:
The number of delayed flights of Alaska Airlines at Phoenix airport is 12 flights from a total of 233 flights that arrive at the Phoenix airport. So, the percentage of flights delayed at Phoenix airport for Alaska Airlines is calculated as:
The number of delayed flights of Alaska Airlines at San Diego airport is 20 flights from a total of 232 flights that arrive at the San Diego airport. So, the percentage of flights delayed at San Diego airport for Alaska Airlines is calculated as:
The number of delayed flights of Alaska Airlines at San Francisco airport is 102 flights from a total of 605 flights that arrive at the San Francisco airport. So, the percentage of flights delayed at San Francisco airport for Alaska Airlines is calculated as:
The number of delayed flights of Alaska Airlines at Seattle airport is 305 flights from a total of 2146 flights that arrive at the Seattle airport. So, the percentage of flights delayed at Seattle airport for Alaska Airlines is calculated as:
Section 2:
To find: The percentage of flights delayed at five airports for America West Airlines.
Solution: The percentage of flights delayed at five airports for America West Airlines is obtained as:
Airport | America West Airlines Delayed percentage |
Los Angeles | 14.4% |
Phoenix | 7.9% |
San Diego | 14.5% |
San Francisco | 28.7% |
Seattle | 23.3% |
Explanation:
Calculation:
Use the two-way table obtained in previous part for delay of America West Airlines flight to determine the percentages of delayed flights at each one of the five airports.
From the obtained two-way table, the number of delayed flights of America West Airlines for Los Angeles airport is 117 flights from a total of 811 flights that arrive at the Los Angeles airport. So, the percentage of flights delayed at Los Angeles airport for America West Airlines is calculated as:
The number of delayed flights of America West Airlines at Phoenix airport is 415 flights from a total of 5255 flights that arrive at the Phoenix airport. So, the percentage of flights delayed at Phoenix airport for America West Airlines is calculated as:
The number of delayed flights of America West Airlines at San Diego airport is 65 flights from a total of 448 flights that arrive at the San Diego airport. So, the percentage of flights delayed at San Diego airport for America West Airlines is calculated as:
The number of delayed flights of America West Airlines at San Francisco airport is 129 flights from a total of 449 flights that arrive at the San Francisco airport. So, the percentage of flights delayed at San Francisco airport for America West Airlines is calculated as:
The number of delayed flights of America West Airlines at Seattle airport is 61 flights from a total of 262 flights that arrive at the Seattle airport. So, the percentage of flights delayed at Seattle airport for America West Airlines is calculated as:
(c)
The reason for America West to have a better performance overall but worse at each one of the five airports.
(c)

Answer to Problem 18E
Solution: The overall performance of America West Airline is better even though it is worse at each one of the five airports as the weather at the airport that flights serve is a lurking variable which reverses the relationship as per Simpson’s paradox.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The provided data shows that the America West performance is worst at every one of the airport but its overall performance is better because of the weather in Phoenix and Seattle gives an overall better performance.
According to Simpson’s paradox, the effect of lurking variables changes or reverses the relationships between categorical variables. In the provided problem, the weather in Phoenix and Seattle is a lurking variable that reverses the relationship and hence the overall performance is better even though it is worse at each one of the five airports.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 24 Solutions
Statistics: Concepts and Controversies
- This is the information about the actors who won the Best Actor Oscar: Best actors 44 41 62 52 41 34 34 52 41 37 38 34 32 40 43 56 41 39 49 57 35 30 39 41 44 41 38 42 52 51 49 35 47 31 47 37 57 42 45 42 44 62 43 42 48 49 56 38 60 30 40 42 36 76 39 53 45 36 62 43 51 32 42 54 52 37 38 32 45 60 46 40 36 47 29 43 a. What is the variable? What type? b. Construct an interval-frequency table, with columns containing: class mark, absolute frequency, relative frequency, cumulative frequency, cumulative relative frequency, and percentage frequency.arrow_forwardans c plsarrow_forwardCritically analyze the following graph and, based on statistical information, indicate the type of error it presents IN NO MORE THAN 3 LINES SCOTCEN POLL OF POLLS SHOULD SCOTLAND BE INDEPENDENT? NO 52% YES 58% LIVE CAW NAS & 28.30 HAS KILLED MORE THAN 2,600 IN WEST AFRICA, WORLD HEALTH ORG. BROOKEBCNNarrow_forward
- Critically analyze the following graph and, based on statistical information, indicate the type of error it presents IN NO MORE THAN 3 LINES PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCES RODOLFO CARTER 3% (+2pts) EVELYN MATTHEI 22% (+6pts) With the exception of President Boric, could you tell me who you would like to be the next president of Chile? CAMILA VALLEJO 4% (+2pts) JOSÉ ANTONIO KAST 19% (+5pts) MICHELLE BACHELET 6% (+1pts)arrow_forwardCritically analyze the following graph and, based on statistical information, indicate the type of error it presents IN NO MORE THAN 3 LINES 13% APPROVE 4% DOESN'T KNOW DOESN'T RESPOND 5% NEITHER APPROVES NOR DISAPPROVES 78% DISAPPROVES SURVEY PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL DROPS TO 13%arrow_forwardPlease help with this following question I'm not too sure if question (a) and (b) are correct and not sure how to calculate (c) The csv data is below "","New","Current" "1","67",66 "2","77",73 "3","76",73 "4","76",76 "5","77",79 "6","84",76 "7","71",78 "8","84",72 "9","73",76 "10","71",73 "11","72",77 "12","70",72 "13","75",72 "14","84",71 "15","77",73 "16","65",72 "17","69",73 "18","71",73 "19","79",71 "20","75",78 "21","76",69 "22","73",74 "23","76",71 "24","64",74 "25","81",78 "26","79",76 "27","70",77 "28","79",71 "29","84",73 "30","79",69 "31","69",72 "32","81",76 "33","77",70 "34","77",71 "35","71",69 "36","67",72 "37","70",76 "38","77",73 "39","82",73 "40","72",73arrow_forward
- Please help me answer the following question(c) A previous study found that 15% of nurses reported participating in mental health support programs.From the 96% found in (b) , can you conclude that proportion of nurses reported participating in mental health support programs p(current), has changed from the previous study?(Yes/No) because the confidence interval in (b) (captures/does not capture) 15%.(d) Refer to your answer in (b) : The Alberta Nurses Association expects that not more than 23 % of nurses will participate in the survey on mental health support programs. Given the result in part (b) can we conclude that this expectation is reasonable?(Yes/No) because the (upper bound/lower bound) of the 96% confidence interval is (less than/not less than/greater than) 23%. The Alberta Nursing Association conducts an annual survey to estimate the proportion of nurses who participate in mental health support programs. The most recent application of this survey involved a random sample of…arrow_forwardPlease help me solve this questionThis is what was in the csv file:"","Diabetic","Heart Disease""1",32644,30646"2",789,1670"3",12802,36274"4",2177,5011"5",1910,3300"6",3320,4256"7",61425,39053"8",19768,28635"9",19502,39546"10",5642,12182"11",107864,152098"12",29918,60433"13",2397,3550"14",41559,34705"15",49169,57948"16",72853,83100"17",2155,2873"18",140220,134517"19",28181,26212"20",18850,38637"21",69564,68582"22",13897,12613"23",6868,9138"24",9735,4767"25",12102,13447"26",36571,50010"27",44665,55141"28",26620,33970"29",25525,29766"30",14167,20206Q(b) From this, the relationship between these two variables is (non-existent/positive/negative) . I can categorize this relationship as being (strong/weak/moderate).Q(c) Drop down is (+/-)Q(d) Drop downs in order are __% of the (average/median/variation/standard deviation) in the (the number of people diagnosed with heart disease/the number of people diagnosed with diabetes)−variable can be explained by its (linear relationship/relationship)…arrow_forwardPlease help me answer the following question The drop down for question (e, f, and g) is (YES/NO) Based on the P-value above, the assumption of equal variances among the four machines (Is Met/Is Not Met) Based on the data, the average fill for machine 3 is (statistically lower than/statistically higher than/the same as/not statistically different than/statistically different than/Hard to say then when comparing to/Refuse to say when comparing to) machine 1.arrow_forward
- Business Discussarrow_forward1 for all k, and set o (ii) Let X1, X2, that P(Xkb) = x > 0. Xn be independent random variables with mean 0, suppose = and Var Xk. Then, for 0x) ≤2 exp-tx+121 Στ k=1arrow_forwardLemma 1.1 Suppose that g is a non-negative, non-decreasing function such that E g(X) 0. Then, E g(|X|) P(|X|> x) ≤ g(x)arrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman





