Sub part (a):
The nominal and real GDP and GDP deflator.
Sub part (a):
Explanation of Solution
The GDP is the summation of the monetary value of all the goods and services produced within the political boundary of a country, within a financial year. There are two different ways of calculating the GDP of the economy and they are the real GDP and the nominal GDP. The real GDP is the GDP calculated at the constant prices. There will be a base
The nominal GDP of the economy can be calculated by multiplying the quantity produced by the per unit price of the commodity. The quantity produced and price in 2013 was 100 quarts of milk and 50 quarts of honey. The prices were $1 and $2 respectively, for each quart. Thus, the nominal GDP of 2013 can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the nominal GDP of 2013 is $200.
Similarly, the quantity produced and price in 2014 was 200 quarts of milk and 100 quarts of honey. The prices were $1 and $2, respectively. Thus, the nominal GDP of 2014 can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the nominal GDP of 2014 is $400.
Similarly, the quantity produced in 2015 was 200 quarts of milk and 100 quarts of honey but the prices increased to $2 and $4, respectively. Thus, the nominal GDP of 2015 can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the nominal GDP of 2015 is $800.
The real GDP can be calculated by multiplying the quantity produced with the base year price level. Since the base year is 2013, the nominal GDP of 2013 will be equal to the real GDP of 2013, which is equal to $200.
In the case of 2014, the real GDP can be calculated by multiplying the 2014 quantity with the 2013 price as follows:
Thus, the real GDP of 2014 is $400.
In the case of 2015, the real GDP can be calculated by multiplying the 2015 quantity with the 2013 price. Since there is no change in the quantity produced in 2015 and 2014 in the two commodities of milk and honey, there will be no change in the real GDP of the two years and thus, the real GDP of 2015 will be the same as 2014, which is $400.
The GDP deflator is the implicit price deflator. It can be calculated by dividing the nominal GDP with the real GDP and multiplying the value with 100 as follows:
Thus, by substituting the values of nominal and real GDP in the equation, we can calculate the GDP deflator as follows:
Thus, the GDP deflator in 2013 is 100. Similarly, the GDP deflator for 2014 can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the GDP deflator in 2014 is also 100.
The GDP deflator for 2015 can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the GDP deflator in 2015 is 200.
These values can be tabulated as follows:
Table 1
Year | Nominal GDP | Real GDP | GDP Deflator |
2013 | $200 | $200 | 100 |
2014 | $400 | $400 | 100 |
2015 | $800 | $400 | 200 |
Concept introduction:
Gross Domestic Product (GDP): It is the summation of the monetary value of all the goods and services produced within the political boundary of a country, within a financial year.
GDP deflator: It is an implicit price deflator.
Sub part (b):
The Percentage change in nominal and real GDP and GDP deflator.
Sub part (b):
Explanation of Solution
The percentage change in nominal GDP can be calculated by the following formula:
Thus, by substituting the values for the current year and previous year, we can calculate the percentage change in the nominal GDP as follows:
Thus, the percentage change in nominal GDP of 2014 is 100 percent.
Thus, the percentage change in nominal GDP of 2015 is also 100 percent.
Similarly, the percentage change in real GDP and GDP deflator can be calculated as follows:
The percentage change in real GDP of 2014 is 100 percent.
The percentage change in real GDP of 2015 is 0 percent.
The percentage change in the GDP deflator can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the percentage change in GDP deflator of 2014 is 0 percent.
Thus, the percentage change in GDP deflator of 2015 is 100 percent.
The prices in the economy remain the same in the year 2013 and 2014, which leads to no change in the percentage change in the GDP deflator. This is why the GDP deflator percentage change is zero. Similarly, the output levels remain the same in the years 2014 and 2015, which leads to the value of percentage change in the real GDP to remain at zero.
Concept introduction:
Gross Domestic Product (GDP): It is the summation of the monetary value of all the goods and services produced within the political boundary of a country, within a financial year.
GDP deflator: It is an implicit price deflator.
Sub part (c):
Economic well-being.
Sub part (c):
Explanation of Solution
The economic well-being increased much larger in the year of 2014, when compared to 2013 and 2015. This result is obtained from the analysis of the data that the real GDP remained the same in 2015 as the real GDP in the 2014. Thus, there were no changes in the real GDP after 2014. But after 2013, the real GDP increased from $200 to $400 in 2014. This means that the well-being rose more in 2014. Another reason why the well-being didn’t rise in 2015 was the price hike. The output remained the same, whereas prices doubled.
Concept introduction:
Gross Domestic Product (GDP): It is the summation of the monetary value of all the goods and services produced within the political boundary of a country, within a financial year.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 23 Solutions
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Course List)
- While visiting and chatting with an old friend who lives in a rural area, a man's teenage daughter joins the conversation and shared that she wants to work on a farm after she graduates from college and that farming is her passion. She shared the graph that follows from the Bureau of Labor Statistics that she recently obtained that shows the average wage (salary) by profession. She was very confused about why different professions pay people different wages. She was expecting the pay rate for people who work in the farming industry to be paid more than other “unnecessary” professions. While sharing the data with you, she asked the following questions: Why do workers in business and financial operations get paid more than those who work in farming and health care? After all, farmers make food and health care workers help people’s health. I don’t get it, but who decides how much people in certain professions get paid? I mean who decides how much I should be compensated for my work? Why…arrow_forwardcaib 2 questions pleasearrow_forwardhow can a sugery drink like pepsi have a tax rise and not loose its customers ?arrow_forward
- Is competition good for business? Is it good for consumers? Explain why or why not for botharrow_forwardInstructions:- Need to do in assembly language. Submit your DOC file with all explanation, also submit your code file. no chatgpt pls no plagirism plsarrow_forward'producing more goods and services lowers environmental quality' is not the correct answer.arrow_forward
- A movement along an economy's production possibility frontier with output on one axis and environmental quality on the other shows that: technological improvements may lead to a sustainable economy with higher consumption in the future and better an improved environment. producing more goods and services lowers environmental quality. producing more goods and services raises environmental quality. a high use of natural resources to produce more goods and services today may lead to an unsustainable economy with lower consumption in the future.arrow_forwardDon't used Ai solutionarrow_forward= - 12. Recall the market setting in Question 3, where the demand curve is P = 10 – 2Q, and mar- ginal cost is c 2. Now suppose that two firms, numbered 1 and 2 compete over this de- mand curve. They produce quantities Q₁ and Q2, hence total output is given by Q = Q1+Q2. The best response function of firm 1 to firm 2, labeled Q₁ = B₁ (Q2) is given by (a) 2-2Q2 - 4 (b) 2-Q2 (c) 2 – 02 Q2 Q2 (d) 2- (e) 2-Q 4 13. In the previous question, the Cournot-Nash equilibrium quantity produced by each firm is (a) 1 (d) 2 (b) 3 2 (e) 52 (c) 43 3arrow_forward
- 2. Sweet taxes make the world sweeter! According to a study conducted by the World Health Organization, noncommunicable diseases, such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic lung disease, and stroke, are the main leading causes of deaths—almost 90% worldwide. These diseases also have social and economic costs. Cardiovascular diseases, for example, cost the economy of the European Union about 210 billion Euro in 2015. One method some European countries adopted to try to reduce the death rate from those leading causes was to impose high taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages. Assume that your next president loves the idea of sugar taxes and proposes a 30% tax on all sugary beverages in the country. And assume you are a marketing manager at a company that makes sugary soft drinks. The owner of the company heard the news and came to you for advice and asked you the following questions: So, buddy, should I be worried about our business if this sugar tax policy is implemented? Why? How do…arrow_forward3. The world is more beautiful with just a bit of makeup. Your friend Nora is an artist, and she loves makeup, so she decided to become a beautician. She recently began recording videos of herself applying makeup to others and posting those videos on social media. She typically charges about $250 for full facial makeup for special occasions like weddings, engagement parties, graduation parties, and so forth. Her work is great, and her videos made her famous on social media outlets, and now she has over 500,000 followers. The demand for her services has risen. People have to book her months in advance if they want her to do their makeup. She was excited about her success, and she wants to take advantage of it, so she wants to learn more about her opportunities and has texted you the following questions: Now people want my services so badly, do you think I should raise my prices from $250 to $500 to make more revenue (sales)? Or should I reduce my price to $150? Please educate me on…arrow_forwardDon't used Ai solution and hand raitingarrow_forward
- Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781285165875Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningBrief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningMacroeconomics: Principles and Policy (MindTap Co...EconomicsISBN:9781305280601Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. BlinderPublisher:Cengage Learning