data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13306/133064279e0cd092c894614ae6004a089c3b9390" alt="Living in the Environment"
(a)
The percentage increase in the per capita GDP between 1950 and 1975 and between 1975 and 2004.
(a)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2698b/2698b129880c27e76a91019c9f73226195062b2d" alt="Check Mark"
Answer to Problem 2DA
The per capita GDP increased approximately by 66.7 % between 1950 and 1975 and approximately by 75% between 1975 and 2004.
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
From the graph, the per capita GDP in 1950 is obtained as 12,000 dollars, the per capita GDP in 1975 is obtained as 20,000 dollars, and the per capita GDP in 2004 is obtained as 35,000 dollars.
Case 1:
The percentage increase in the per capita GDP between 1950 and 1975 can be obtained using the expression given below:
Substitute 20,000 dollars for the per capita GDP in 1975 and 12,000 dollars for the per capita GDP in 1950 in the above expression to obtain the percentage increase in the per capita GDP between 1950 and 1975.
Hence, there is approximately 66.7% increase in the per capita GDP between 1950 and 1975.
Case 2:
The percentage increase in the per capita GDP between 1975 and 2004 can be obtained using the expression given below:
Substitute 35,000 dollars for the per capita GDP in 2004 and 20,000 dollars for the per capita GDP in 1975 in the above expression to obtain the percentage increase in the per capita GDP between 1975 and 2004.
Hence, there is approximately 75% increase in the per capita GDP between 1975 and 2004.
(b)
The percentage decrease in the per capita GPI between 1950 and 1975 and 1975 and 2004.
(b)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2698b/2698b129880c27e76a91019c9f73226195062b2d" alt="Check Mark"
Answer to Problem 2DA
The per capita GPI increased approximately by 69% between 1950 and 1975 and decreased approximately by 9% between 1975 and 2004.
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
From the graph, the per capita GPI in 1950 is obtained as 6,500 dollars, the per capita GPI in 1975 is obtained as 11,000 dollars, and the per capita GPI in 2004 is obtained as 10,000 dollars.
Case 1:
The percentage decrease in the per capita GPI between 1950 and 1975 can be obtained using the expression given below:
Substitute 11,000 dollars for the per capita GPI in 1975 and 6,500 dollars for the per capita GPI in 1950 in the above expression to obtain the percentage decrease in the per capita GPI between 1950 and 1975.
Here, the value obtained is positive and hence, there is an increase in the GPI from 1950 to 1975 rather than a decrease. Therefore, there is approximately 69% increase in the per capita GPI between in 1950 and 1975.
Case 2:
The percentage decrease in the per capita GPI between 1975 and 2004 can be obtained using the expression given below:
Substitute 10,000 dollars for the per capita GPI in 2004 and 11,000 dollars for the per capita GPI in 1975 in the above expression to obtain the percentage decrease in the per capita GPI between 1975 and 2004.
Here, the value obtained is negative and hence, there is a decrease in the GPI from 1975 to 2004 rather than an increase. Therefore, there is approximately 9% decrease in the per capita GPI between 1975 and 2004.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- Distinguish between reserves and resoircesarrow_forwardDescribe what kind of energy source oil ia. Describe 5 advantages of oil as an energy source. Describe 5 disadvantages of oil as energy source. Discuss the future potential of oil as energy source in the United States. Describe how you would convince the residents of the State of Connecticut to utilize more oil as an energy source.arrow_forwardWhat are negative environmental impacts of developing hydroelectric power?arrow_forward
- List 3 energy conservation tecniquesarrow_forward1. Use the elevations in Figure 7.12 as a guide for drawing contour lines. The 100-foot contour line is provided for reference. Using a 20-foot contour interval, draw a contour line for each 20-foot change in elevation below and above 100 feet (e.g., 60 feet, 80 feet, 120 feet). You will have to estimate the elevations between the points. Label each contour line with its elevation. 2. Does the land shown on the topographic map you constructed generally slope downward toward the north or south? 3. Show the direction each stream is flowing by drawing arrows on the map.arrow_forwardDrawing a Topographic Profile Follow the steps illustrated in Figure 7.13 to draw a topographic profile. Use the profile graph in Figure 7.14 to construct a west-east profile along the line A-A' on the contour map you completed in Figure 7.12. Step 1. Our sample profile will be along line A-A. When constructing profiles on maps provided by your instructor, do not draw on the map. Step 2. Lay a piece of paper along the line of the profile you want to construct. In this example this is line A-A'. Mark each place where a contour line intersects the edge of the paper and note the elevation of the contour line. Step 3. On a separate piece of paper, draw a horizontal line slightly longer than your profile line, A-A'. Select a vertical scale for your profile that begins slightly. below the lowest elevation along the profile and extends slightly beyond the highest elevation. Mark this scale on either side of the horizontal line. Lay the marked paper edge (from Step 2) along the horizontal…arrow_forward
- When contour lines cross streams or dry stream channels, they form a V that points upstream. Draw arrows next to three of the streams (shown in blue) to indicate the direction in which each is flowing.arrow_forwardCoal-burning electric power plants in the Pa Midwest have contributed to acid rain in the eastern United States. Other energy sources would most likely be costlier than coal, thereby raising electricity rates. Should citizens in eastern states be able to pressure utility companies in the Midwest to change their method of generating electricity? What mechanisms might be available to make these changes? How effective are these mechanisms?arrow_forwardWhat renewable energy source provides the majority of renewable energy?arrow_forward
- Applications and Investigations in Earth Science ...Earth ScienceISBN:9780134746241Author:Edward J. Tarbuck, Frederick K. Lutgens, Dennis G. TasaPublisher:PEARSONExercises for Weather & Climate (9th Edition)Earth ScienceISBN:9780134041360Author:Greg CarbonePublisher:PEARSONEnvironmental ScienceEarth ScienceISBN:9781260153125Author:William P Cunningham Prof., Mary Ann Cunningham ProfessorPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
- Earth Science (15th Edition)Earth ScienceISBN:9780134543536Author:Edward J. Tarbuck, Frederick K. Lutgens, Dennis G. TasaPublisher:PEARSONEnvironmental Science (MindTap Course List)Earth ScienceISBN:9781337569613Author:G. Tyler Miller, Scott SpoolmanPublisher:Cengage LearningPhysical GeologyEarth ScienceISBN:9781259916823Author:Plummer, Charles C., CARLSON, Diane H., Hammersley, LisaPublisher:Mcgraw-hill Education,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6ca0/b6ca0921b5a5cf1e7a06cc09b3d85ae71cf21b82" alt="Text book image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6db14/6db147953217715e3f251286f3c16f48c69d79cd" alt="Text book image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8abb3/8abb341384d2b16a3b2fa3100fe7d3be80445fe4" alt="Text book image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fdf0/2fdf0599644570482875f53341bb03aa70d2da39" alt="Text book image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/987bc/987bc6e9051988fb81092bdbbd92acfd79cfc662" alt="Text book image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f4be/8f4beb36c50fc2cee19e88f62b3b3ab552b6e4b2" alt="Text book image"