Practice of Statistics in the Life Sciences
Practice of Statistics in the Life Sciences
4th Edition
ISBN: 9781319013370
Author: Brigitte Baldi, David S. Moore
Publisher: W. H. Freeman
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 23, Problem 23.38E

(a)

To determine

To explain:

The scatterplot of white matter change and the explanatory of the given data.

(a)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Given:

The table of the exposure and change.

Concept used:

Formula

The binomial distribution

  p[X=x]=(nx)pxqnx

Calculation:

Scatter plot is given as the table

The weak is negative relationship exists.

Because the value of r=0.30

Where r is negative

Let us perform the regression

Regressing sub concussion exposure on white matter change with below mentioned steps in excel

  X And Y are two variables.

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics

Multiple R =0.368868063

R Square =0.136063648

Adjusted R Square =0.09286683

Standard Error = 3.467466463

Observations =22

Draw the table

    DegreeSSMSFSignificant
    Regression 137.8717083337.87173.1498540.091157025
    Residual 20240.466473512.02332
    Total 21278.3381818

Draw the second table

    CoefficientStandard Errort StatP-valueLower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%Upper 95.0%
    Intercept2.2720152571.2015559641.8908940.073215-0.2343865574.778417071-0.234386557 4.778417071
    X-6.912959936 3.895102237-1.774780.091157-15.03800081.212080931-15.03800081.212080931

(b)

To determine

To find:

Theregression standard error of the given data.

(b)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Given:

The table of the exposure and change.

Concept used:

Formula

The binomial distribution

  p[X=x]=(nx)pxqnx

Calculation:

Scatter plot is given as the table

The weak is negative relationship exists.

Because the value of r=0.30

Where r is negative

Let us perform the regression

Regressing sub concussion exposure on white matter change with below mentioned steps in excel

  X And Y are two variables.

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics

Multiple R =0.368868063

R Square =0.136063648

Adjusted R Square =0.09286683

Standard Error = 3.467466463

Observations =22

Draw the table

    DegreeSSMSFSignificant
    Regression 137.8717083337.87173.1498540.091157025
    Residual 20240.466473512.02332
    Total 21278.3381818

Draw the second table

    CoefficientStandard Errort StatP-valueLower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%Upper 95.0%
    Intercept2.2720152571.2015559641.8908940.073215-0.2343865574.778417071-0.234386557 4.778417071
    X-6.912959936 3.895102237-1.774780.091157-15.03800081.212080931-15.03800081.212080931

Here X= exposure

  Y= Change as variable

So least squares regression line

Change ( Y ) = 6.913 Exposure (X) + 2.272

Regression standard error = 3.467

The low p-value of 0.0912 of the Exposure coefficient, indicates that a confidence level of 90% (where p-value of 0.1 ) that the Exposure is a significant predictor of white matter Change.

Hence, the null hypothesis of no relationship between exposure and white matter change can be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis at a confidence level of 10%.

(c)

To determine

To explain:

Theequation for the least-squares regression line without data point and test null hypothesis of the given data.

(c)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Given:

The table of the exposure and change.

Concept used:

Formula

The binomial distribution

  p[X=x]=(nx)pxqnx

Calculation:

Scatter plot is given as the table

The weak is negative relationship exists.

Because the value of r=0.30

Where r is negative

Let us perform the regression

Regressing sub concussion exposure on white matter change with below mentioned steps in excel

  X And Y are two variables.

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics

Multiple R =0.368868063

R Square =0.136063648

Adjusted R Square =0.09286683

Standard Error = 3.467466463

Observations =22

Draw the table

    DegreeSSMSFSignificant
    Regression 137.8717083337.87173.1498540.091157025
    Residual 20240.466473512.02332
    Total 21278.3381818

Draw the second table

    CoefficientStandard Errort StatP-valueLower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%Upper 95.0%
    Intercept2.2720152571.2015559641.8908940.073215-0.2343865574.778417071-0.234386557 4.778417071
    X-6.912959936 3.895102237-1.774780.091157-15.03800081.212080931-15.03800081.212080931

Here X= exposure

  Y= Change as variable

So least squares regression line

Change ( Y ) = 6.913 Exposure (X) + 2.272

Regression standard error = 3.467

The low p-value of 0.0912 of the Exposure coefficient, indicates that a confidence level of 90% (where p-value of 0.1 ) that the Exposure is a significant predictor of white matter Change.

Hence, the null hypothesis of no relationship between exposure and white matter change can be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis at a confidence level of 10%.

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics

Multiple R =0.104318418

R Square =0.010882332

Adjusted R Square =-0.041176492

Standard Error = 3.471079833

Observations =21

Draw the table

    DegreeSSMSFSignificant
    Regression 12.5185862442.5185860.2090390.652706126
    Residual 19228.91950912.0484
    Total 20231.4380952

Draw the second table

    CoefficientStandard Errort StatP-valueLower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%Upper 95.0%
    Intercept1.475861.451931.016480.32216-1.563064.51480-1.563064.51480
    X-2.66665.83246-0.457210.65270-14.87419.5408-14.87419.54083

Standard error is same

But the p value is 0.65

Exposure is not good predictor of Change in white matter.

Also, the Exposure coefficient has come down from 6.91 to 2.67 ,

(d)

To determine

To explain:

Theimpact of the usual observation on the regression analysis of the given data.

(d)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Given:

The table of the exposure and change.

Concept used:

Formula

The binomial distribution

  p[X=x]=(nx)pxqnx

Calculation:

Scatter plot is given as the table

The weak is negative relationship exists.

Because the value of r=0.30

Where r is negative

Let us perform the regression

Regressing sub concussion exposure on white matter change with below mentioned steps in excel

  X And Y are two variables.

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics

Multiple R =0.368868063

R Square =0.136063648

Adjusted R Square =0.09286683

Standard Error = 3.467466463

Observations =22

Draw the table

    DegreeSSMSFSignificant
    Regression 137.8717083337.87173.1498540.091157025
    Residual 20240.466473512.02332
    Total 21278.3381818

Draw the second table

    CoefficientStandard Errort StatP-valueLower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%Upper 95.0%
    Intercept2.2720152571.2015559641.8908940.073215-0.2343865574.778417071-0.234386557 4.778417071
    X-6.912959936 3.895102237-1.774780.091157-15.03800081.212080931-15.03800081.212080931

Here X= exposure

  Y= Change as variable

So least squares regression line

Change ( Y ) = 6.913 Exposure (X) + 2.272

Regression standard error = 3.467

The low p-value of 0.0912 of the Exposure coefficient, indicates that a confidence level of 90% (where p-value of 0.1 ) that the Exposure is a significant predictor of white matter Change.

Hence, the null hypothesis of no relationship between exposure and white matter change can be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis at a confidence level of 10%.

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics

Multiple R =0.104318418

R Square =0.010882332

Adjusted R Square =-0.041176492

Standard Error = 3.471079833

Observations =21

Draw the table

    DegreeSSMSFSignificant
    Regression 12.5185862442.5185860.2090390.652706126
    Residual 19228.91950912.0484
    Total 20231.4380952

Draw the second table

    CoefficientStandard Errort StatP-valueLower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%Upper 95.0%
    Intercept1.475861.451931.016480.32216-1.563064.51480-1.563064.51480
    X-2.66665.83246-0.457210.65270-14.87419.5408-14.87419.54083

Standard error is same

But the p value is 0.65

Exposure is not good predictor of Change in white matter.

Also, the Exposure coefficient has come down from 6.91 to 2.67 ,

The Change in white matter will not actually change as fast

So,eliminate of the outlier data points.

The Outlier data points tend to increase the correlation between the two variables.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Calculate the 90% confidence interval for the population mean difference using the data in the attached image. I need to see where I went wrong.
Microsoft Excel snapshot for random sampling: Also note the formula used for the last column 02 x✓ fx =INDEX(5852:58551, RANK(C2, $C$2:$C$51)) A B 1 No. States 2 1 ALABAMA Rand No. 0.925957526 3 2 ALASKA 0.372999976 4 3 ARIZONA 0.941323044 5 4 ARKANSAS 0.071266381 Random Sample CALIFORNIA NORTH CAROLINA ARKANSAS WASHINGTON G7 Microsoft Excel snapshot for systematic sampling: xfx INDEX(SD52:50551, F7) A B E F G 1 No. States Rand No. Random Sample population 50 2 1 ALABAMA 0.5296685 NEW HAMPSHIRE sample 10 3 2 ALASKA 0.4493186 OKLAHOMA k 5 4 3 ARIZONA 0.707914 KANSAS 5 4 ARKANSAS 0.4831379 NORTH DAKOTA 6 5 CALIFORNIA 0.7277162 INDIANA Random Sample Sample Name 7 6 COLORADO 0.5865002 MISSISSIPPI 8 7:ONNECTICU 0.7640596 ILLINOIS 9 8 DELAWARE 0.5783029 MISSOURI 525 10 15 INDIANA MARYLAND COLORADO
Suppose the Internal Revenue Service reported that the mean tax refund for the year 2022 was $3401. Assume the standard deviation is $82.5 and that the amounts refunded follow a normal probability distribution. Solve the following three parts? (For the answer to question 14, 15, and 16, start with making a bell curve. Identify on the bell curve where is mean, X, and area(s) to be determined. 1.What percent of the refunds are more than $3,500? 2. What percent of the refunds are more than $3500 but less than $3579? 3. What percent of the refunds are more than $3325 but less than $3579?
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:John Wiley & Sons Inc
Text book image
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th...
Statistics
ISBN:9781305251809
Author:Jay L. Devore
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...
Statistics
ISBN:9781305504912
Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...
Statistics
ISBN:9780134683416
Author:Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:9781319042578
Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:W. H. Freeman
Text book image
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:9781319013387
Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:W. H. Freeman