
Concept explainers
(a)
To find: The proportions of failures for businesses headed by women and businesses headed by men.
To test: Whether the same proportion of women’s and men’s businesses fails or not.
To find: The hypotheses, the test statistic, P-value and conclusion.
(a)

Answer to Problem 23.25E
The proportion of failures for businesses headed by men is 0.1415.
The proportion of failures for businesses headed by women is 0.1666.
The null hypothesis is
The alternative hypothesis is
The value of the z-statistic is –0.39.
The P-value is 0.698.
The conclusion is that, the same proportion of women’s and men’s businesses fails.
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
In the survey, 15 out of 106 were headed by men failed and 7 out of 42 were headed by women failed.
Calculation:
PLAN:
Check whether the same proportion of women’s and men’s businesses fails or not.
State the test hypotheses.
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
SOLVE:
Test statistic and P-value:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to obtain proportion, test statistic and P-value using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > 2 Proportions.
- Choose Summarized data.
- In First sample, enter Trials as 106 and
Events as 15. - In Second sample, enter Trials as 42 and Events as 7.
- Choose Options.
- Choose Pooled proportions.
- In Confidence level, enter 95.
- In Alternative, select not equal.
- Click OK in all the dialogue boxes.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the MINITAB output,
The proportion of failures for businesses headed by men is 0.1415.
The proportion of failures for businesses headed by women is 0.1666.
The value of the z-statistic is –0.39.
The P-value is 0.698.
CONCLUDE:
The P-value is 0.698 and the significance level is 0.05.
Here, the P-value is greater than the significance level.
That is,
Therefore, using the rejection rule, it can be concluded that there is no evidence to reject
Thus, the same proportion of women’s and men’s businesses fails.
(b)
To find: The proportions of failures for businesses headed by women and businesses headed by men.
To test: Whether the same proportion of women’s and men’s businesses fails or not.
To find: The hypotheses, the test statistic, P-value and conclusion.
(b)

Answer to Problem 23.25E
The proportion of failures for businesses headed by men is 0.1415.
The proportion of failures for businesses headed by women is 0.1666.
The null hypothesis is
The alternative hypothesis is
The value of the z-statistic is –2.12.
The P-value is 0.034.
The conclusion is that, there is no evidence that the same proportion of women’s and men’s businesses fails.
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
In the survey, 210 out of 1,260 were headed by women failed and 450 out of 3,180 were headed by men failed.
Calculation:
PLAN:
Check whether the same proportion of women’s and men’s businesses fails or not.
State the test hypotheses.
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
SOLVE:
Test statistic and P-value:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to obtain proportion, test statistic and P-value using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > 2 Proportions.
- Choose Summarized data.
- In First sample, enter Trials as 3,180 and Events as 450.
- In Second sample, enter Trials as 1,260 and Events as 210.
- Choose Options.
- Choose Pooled proportions.
- In Confidence level, enter 95.
- In Alternative, select not equal.
- Click OK in all the dialogue boxes.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the MINITAB output,
The proportion of failures for businesses headed by men is 0.1415.
The proportion of failures for businesses headed by women is 0.1666.
The value of the z-statistic is –2.12.
The P-value is 0.034.
CONCLUDE:
The P-value is 0.034 and the significance level is 0.05.
Here, the P-value is less than the significance level.
That is,
Therefore, using the rejection rule, it can be concluded that there is evidence to reject
Thus, there is no evidence that the same proportion of women’s and men’s businesses fails.
(c)
To find: The 95% confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of women’s and men’s businesses that fail for the settings of part (a).
To find: The 95% confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of women’s and men’s businesses that fail for the settings of part (b).
To identify: The effect of larger samples on the confidence interval.
(c)

Answer to Problem 23.25E
The 95% confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of women’s and men’s businesses that fail for the settings of part (a) is
The 95% confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of women’s and men’s businesses that fail for the settings of part (b) is
The effect of larger samples on the confidence interval is that the confidence interval is narrow.
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
In the survey, 210 out of 1,260 were headed by women failed and 450 out of 3,180 were headed by men failed.
Calculation:
From part (a), the 95% confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of women’s and men’s businesses that fail for the settings of part (a) is
From part (b), the 95% confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of women’s and men’s businesses that fail for the settings of part (b) is
Justification:
From the results, it can be observed that the confidence interval is narrow if the sample is 30 times large.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 23 Solutions
Loose-leaf Version for The Basic Practice of Statistics 7e & LaunchPad (Twelve Month Access)
- I need help with this problem and an explanation of the solution for the image described below. (Statistics: Engineering Probabilities)arrow_forwardI need help with this problem and an explanation of the solution for the image described below. (Statistics: Engineering Probabilities)arrow_forwardI need help with this problem and an explanation of the solution for the image described below. (Statistics: Engineering Probabilities)arrow_forward
- I need help with this problem and an explanation of the solution for the image described below. (Statistics: Engineering Probabilities)arrow_forwardI need help with this problem and an explanation of the solution for the image described below. (Statistics: Engineering Probabilities)arrow_forward3. Consider the following regression model: Yi Bo+B1x1 + = ···· + ßpxip + Єi, i = 1, . . ., n, where are i.i.d. ~ N (0,0²). (i) Give the MLE of ẞ and σ², where ẞ = (Bo, B₁,..., Bp)T. (ii) Derive explicitly the expressions of AIC and BIC for the above linear regression model, based on their general formulae.arrow_forward
- How does the width of prediction intervals for ARMA(p,q) models change as the forecast horizon increases? Grows to infinity at a square root rate Depends on the model parameters Converges to a fixed value Grows to infinity at a linear ratearrow_forwardConsider the AR(3) model X₁ = 0.6Xt-1 − 0.4Xt-2 +0.1Xt-3. What is the value of the PACF at lag 2? 0.6 Not enough information None of these values 0.1 -0.4 이arrow_forwardSuppose you are gambling on a roulette wheel. Each time the wheel is spun, the result is one of the outcomes 0, 1, and so on through 36. Of these outcomes, 18 are red, 18 are black, and 1 is green. On each spin you bet $5 that a red outcome will occur and $1 that the green outcome will occur. If red occurs, you win a net $4. (You win $10 from red and nothing from green.) If green occurs, you win a net $24. (You win $30 from green and nothing from red.) If black occurs, you lose everything you bet for a loss of $6. a. Use simulation to generate 1,000 plays from this strategy. Each play should indicate the net amount won or lost. Then, based on these outcomes, calculate a 95% confidence interval for the total net amount won or lost from 1,000 plays of the game. (Round your answers to two decimal places and if your answer is negative value, enter "minus" sign.) I worked out the Upper Limit, but I can't seem to arrive at the correct answer for the Lower Limit. What is the Lower Limit?…arrow_forward
- Let us suppose we have some article reported on a study of potential sources of injury to equine veterinarians conducted at a university veterinary hospital. Forces on the hand were measured for several common activities that veterinarians engage in when examining or treating horses. We will consider the forces on the hands for two tasks, lifting and using ultrasound. Assume that both sample sizes are 6, the sample mean force for lifting was 6.2 pounds with standard deviation 1.5 pounds, and the sample mean force for using ultrasound was 6.4 pounds with standard deviation 0.3 pounds. Assume that the standard deviations are known. Suppose that you wanted to detect a true difference in mean force of 0.25 pounds on the hands for these two activities. Under the null hypothesis, 40 0. What level of type II error would you recommend here? = Round your answer to four decimal places (e.g. 98.7654). Use α = 0.05. β = 0.0594 What sample size would be required? Assume the sample sizes are to be…arrow_forwardConsider the hypothesis test Ho: 0 s² = = 4.5; s² = 2.3. Use a = 0.01. = σ against H₁: 6 > σ2. Suppose that the sample sizes are n₁ = 20 and 2 = 8, and that (a) Test the hypothesis. Round your answers to two decimal places (e.g. 98.76). The test statistic is fo = 1.96 The critical value is f = 6.18 Conclusion: fail to reject the null hypothesis at a = 0.01. (b) Construct the confidence interval on 02/2/622 which can be used to test the hypothesis: (Round your answer to two decimal places (e.g. 98.76).) 035arrow_forwardUsing the method of sections need help solving this please explain im stuckarrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman





