The underlying premises and definitions that shape the arguments based on the warning of ecologists that people are using up irreplaceable natural resources and the response of economists that ingenuity and enterprise would find substitutes for most resources.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 23, Problem 23.1CTDQ

To determine

The underlying premises and definitions that shape the arguments based on the warning of ecologists that people are using up irreplaceable natural resources and the response of economists that ingenuity and enterprise would find substitutes for most resources.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 23.1CTDQ

The ecologists are right on their point when they said that people are using irreplaceable natural resources that are in limited quantities and might get run out of the stock whereas economists responded that most of the resources would be substituted with an alternative in future according to the scarcity of the particular resource.

Explanation of Solution

The irreplaceable natural resources are also known as the non-renewable resources. These resources cannot be renewed again. The examples of irreplaceable or non-renewable natural resources are solar energy, water, oxygen and many more. The finite reserves of the natural resources are depleting day by day due to the effects of pollution. This depletion is a great threat especially for the irreplaceable or non-renewable natural resources because they are not replaceable.

The ecologists have correctly said that people are using those resources which are not replaceable or renewed means if these resources would get over then it would never be available again. Anything which is in limited amounts might get run out of stock and it depends upon the rate of consumption.

Whereas the economists argued that ingenuity and enterprise would find substitutes for most resources. They meant to say that most of the resources would be substituted. It has been a continuous increment in the commodity prices and the hikes in the prices of the commodity are exerting pressure on the companies and consumers to see any other alterative which is relatively cheaper than the costly commodity. For example, the hiked-price of petroleum which is present in the limited quantity and might be its supply would get over after sometime in future due to scarcity. Due to the present situation of oil crisis and hiking fuel prices, many companies and scientists have introduced the concept of solar power and wind energy which might be the possible alternate to petroleum oil if petroleum oil would completely run out of the stock in future.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Please help as soon as possible. I have an answer for this, but I'm a bit confused, so any extra assistance would be appreciated! Complete the cross sections on the front and side of the block diagram in Figure 6.6. Complete the cross-section of the side of the block diagram in Figure 6.7. Complete the front and side of the block diagram in Figure 6.8

a. Draw four sedimentary layers of equal thickness that have a strike of N90°E. (Hint: Sketch the map view first.)b. Each layer is dipping to the south at an angle of 60°.c. On the block diagram complete the map view and both cross-sectional views.d. Add strike-dip symbols for each rock layer on both parts of Figure 6.9.

There is an old axiom (a self-evident or universally recognized truth) of economics that “There is no such thing as a free lunch”. In the United States, stringent, enforced water quality laws and regulations provide a high level of protection of our waters. This is accomplished at a significant cost. For example, (sewage treatment plants use 2% of the electricity produced in the United States. This high level of protection increases the cost of goods manufactured in the United States compared to other nations such as China where standards are lower, enforcement a bit lax and in some cases, non-existent. What five (5) things could be done to “level the playing field” so that all manufacturers must provide the same degree of water quality protection no matter where in the world they are located? include how each of your ideas will be implemented (ex: which organization will be provided the power and resources to make sure each idea happens). These should be only about water pollution,…

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 23, Problem 23.1CTDQ

To determine

The underlying premises and definitions that shape the arguments based on the warning of ecologists that people are using up irreplaceable natural resources and the response of economists that ingenuity and enterprise would find substitutes for most resources.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 23.1CTDQ

The ecologists are right on their point when they said that people are using irreplaceable natural resources that are in limited quantities and might get run out of the stock whereas economists responded that most of the resources would be substituted with an alternative in future according to the scarcity of the particular resource.

Explanation of Solution

The irreplaceable natural resources are also known as the non-renewable resources. These resources cannot be renewed again. The examples of irreplaceable or non-renewable natural resources are solar energy, water, oxygen and many more. The finite reserves of the natural resources are depleting day by day due to the effects of pollution. This depletion is a great threat especially for the irreplaceable or non-renewable natural resources because they are not replaceable.

The ecologists have correctly said that people are using those resources which are not replaceable or renewed means if these resources would get over then it would never be available again. Anything which is in limited amounts might get run out of stock and it depends upon the rate of consumption.

Whereas the economists argued that ingenuity and enterprise would find substitutes for most resources. They meant to say that most of the resources would be substituted. It has been a continuous increment in the commodity prices and the hikes in the prices of the commodity are exerting pressure on the companies and consumers to see any other alterative which is relatively cheaper than the costly commodity. For example, the hiked-price of petroleum which is present in the limited quantity and might be its supply would get over after sometime in future due to scarcity. Due to the present situation of oil crisis and hiking fuel prices, many companies and scientists have introduced the concept of solar power and wind energy which might be the possible alternate to petroleum oil if petroleum oil would completely run out of the stock in future.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 23, Problem 23.1CTDQ

To determine

The underlying premises and definitions that shape the arguments based on the warning of ecologists that people are using up irreplaceable natural resources and the response of economists that ingenuity and enterprise would find substitutes for most resources.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 23.1CTDQ

The ecologists are right on their point when they said that people are using irreplaceable natural resources that are in limited quantities and might get run out of the stock whereas economists responded that most of the resources would be substituted with an alternative in future according to the scarcity of the particular resource.

Explanation of Solution

The irreplaceable natural resources are also known as the non-renewable resources. These resources cannot be renewed again. The examples of irreplaceable or non-renewable natural resources are solar energy, water, oxygen and many more. The finite reserves of the natural resources are depleting day by day due to the effects of pollution. This depletion is a great threat especially for the irreplaceable or non-renewable natural resources because they are not replaceable.

The ecologists have correctly said that people are using those resources which are not replaceable or renewed means if these resources would get over then it would never be available again. Anything which is in limited amounts might get run out of stock and it depends upon the rate of consumption.

Whereas the economists argued that ingenuity and enterprise would find substitutes for most resources. They meant to say that most of the resources would be substituted. It has been a continuous increment in the commodity prices and the hikes in the prices of the commodity are exerting pressure on the companies and consumers to see any other alterative which is relatively cheaper than the costly commodity. For example, the hiked-price of petroleum which is present in the limited quantity and might be its supply would get over after sometime in future due to scarcity. Due to the present situation of oil crisis and hiking fuel prices, many companies and scientists have introduced the concept of solar power and wind energy which might be the possible alternate to petroleum oil if petroleum oil would completely run out of the stock in future.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 23, Problem 23.1CTDQ

To determine

The underlying premises and definitions that shape the arguments based on the warning of ecologists that people are using up irreplaceable natural resources and the response of economists that ingenuity and enterprise would find substitutes for most resources.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 23.1CTDQ

The ecologists are right on their point when they said that people are using irreplaceable natural resources that are in limited quantities and might get run out of the stock whereas economists responded that most of the resources would be substituted with an alternative in future according to the scarcity of the particular resource.

Explanation of Solution

The irreplaceable natural resources are also known as the non-renewable resources. These resources cannot be renewed again. The examples of irreplaceable or non-renewable natural resources are solar energy, water, oxygen and many more. The finite reserves of the natural resources are depleting day by day due to the effects of pollution. This depletion is a great threat especially for the irreplaceable or non-renewable natural resources because they are not replaceable.

The ecologists have correctly said that people are using those resources which are not replaceable or renewed means if these resources would get over then it would never be available again. Anything which is in limited amounts might get run out of stock and it depends upon the rate of consumption.

Whereas the economists argued that ingenuity and enterprise would find substitutes for most resources. They meant to say that most of the resources would be substituted. It has been a continuous increment in the commodity prices and the hikes in the prices of the commodity are exerting pressure on the companies and consumers to see any other alterative which is relatively cheaper than the costly commodity. For example, the hiked-price of petroleum which is present in the limited quantity and might be its supply would get over after sometime in future due to scarcity. Due to the present situation of oil crisis and hiking fuel prices, many companies and scientists have introduced the concept of solar power and wind energy which might be the possible alternate to petroleum oil if petroleum oil would completely run out of the stock in future.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 23, Problem 23.1CTDQ

To determine

The underlying premises and definitions that shape the arguments based on the warning of ecologists that people are using up irreplaceable natural resources and the response of economists that ingenuity and enterprise would find substitutes for most resources.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 23.1CTDQ

The ecologists are right on their point when they said that people are using irreplaceable natural resources that are in limited quantities and might get run out of the stock whereas economists responded that most of the resources would be substituted with an alternative in future according to the scarcity of the particular resource.

Explanation of Solution

The irreplaceable natural resources are also known as the non-renewable resources. These resources cannot be renewed again. The examples of irreplaceable or non-renewable natural resources are solar energy, water, oxygen and many more. The finite reserves of the natural resources are depleting day by day due to the effects of pollution. This depletion is a great threat especially for the irreplaceable or non-renewable natural resources because they are not replaceable.

The ecologists have correctly said that people are using those resources which are not replaceable or renewed means if these resources would get over then it would never be available again. Anything which is in limited amounts might get run out of stock and it depends upon the rate of consumption.

Whereas the economists argued that ingenuity and enterprise would find substitutes for most resources. They meant to say that most of the resources would be substituted. It has been a continuous increment in the commodity prices and the hikes in the prices of the commodity are exerting pressure on the companies and consumers to see any other alterative which is relatively cheaper than the costly commodity. For example, the hiked-price of petroleum which is present in the limited quantity and might be its supply would get over after sometime in future due to scarcity. Due to the present situation of oil crisis and hiking fuel prices, many companies and scientists have introduced the concept of solar power and wind energy which might be the possible alternate to petroleum oil if petroleum oil would completely run out of the stock in future.

Answer 6

Chapter 23, Problem 23.1CTDQ

To determine

The underlying premises and definitions that shape the arguments based on the warning of ecologists that people are using up irreplaceable natural resources and the response of economists that ingenuity and enterprise would find substitutes for most resources.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 23.1CTDQ

The ecologists are right on their point when they said that people are using irreplaceable natural resources that are in limited quantities and might get run out of the stock whereas economists responded that most of the resources would be substituted with an alternative in future according to the scarcity of the particular resource.

Explanation of Solution

The irreplaceable natural resources are also known as the non-renewable resources. These resources cannot be renewed again. The examples of irreplaceable or non-renewable natural resources are solar energy, water, oxygen and many more. The finite reserves of the natural resources are depleting day by day due to the effects of pollution. This depletion is a great threat especially for the irreplaceable or non-renewable natural resources because they are not replaceable.

The ecologists have correctly said that people are using those resources which are not replaceable or renewed means if these resources would get over then it would never be available again. Anything which is in limited amounts might get run out of stock and it depends upon the rate of consumption.

Whereas the economists argued that ingenuity and enterprise would find substitutes for most resources. They meant to say that most of the resources would be substituted. It has been a continuous increment in the commodity prices and the hikes in the prices of the commodity are exerting pressure on the companies and consumers to see any other alterative which is relatively cheaper than the costly commodity. For example, the hiked-price of petroleum which is present in the limited quantity and might be its supply would get over after sometime in future due to scarcity. Due to the present situation of oil crisis and hiking fuel prices, many companies and scientists have introduced the concept of solar power and wind energy which might be the possible alternate to petroleum oil if petroleum oil would completely run out of the stock in future.

Answer 7

Chapter 23, Problem 23.1CTDQ

To determine

The underlying premises and definitions that shape the arguments based on the warning of ecologists that people are using up irreplaceable natural resources and the response of economists that ingenuity and enterprise would find substitutes for most resources.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 23.1CTDQ

The ecologists are right on their point when they said that people are using irreplaceable natural resources that are in limited quantities and might get run out of the stock whereas economists responded that most of the resources would be substituted with an alternative in future according to the scarcity of the particular resource.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Explanation of Solution

The irreplaceable natural resources are also known as the non-renewable resources. These resources cannot be renewed again. The examples of irreplaceable or non-renewable natural resources are solar energy, water, oxygen and many more. The finite reserves of the natural resources are depleting day by day due to the effects of pollution. This depletion is a great threat especially for the irreplaceable or non-renewable natural resources because they are not replaceable.

The ecologists have correctly said that people are using those resources which are not replaceable or renewed means if these resources would get over then it would never be available again. Anything which is in limited amounts might get run out of stock and it depends upon the rate of consumption.

Whereas the economists argued that ingenuity and enterprise would find substitutes for most resources. They meant to say that most of the resources would be substituted. It has been a continuous increment in the commodity prices and the hikes in the prices of the commodity are exerting pressure on the companies and consumers to see any other alterative which is relatively cheaper than the costly commodity. For example, the hiked-price of petroleum which is present in the limited quantity and might be its supply would get over after sometime in future due to scarcity. Due to the present situation of oil crisis and hiking fuel prices, many companies and scientists have introduced the concept of solar power and wind energy which might be the possible alternate to petroleum oil if petroleum oil would completely run out of the stock in future.

Answer 12

Ch. 23.1 - Prob. 1SR Ch. 23.1 - Prob. 2SR Ch. 23.1 - Prob. 3SR Ch. 23.2 - Prob. 1SR Ch. 23.2 - Prob. 2SR Ch. 23.2 - Prob. 3SR Ch. 23.2 - Prob. 4SR Ch. 23.2 - Prob. 1QR Ch. 23.3 - Prob. 1SR Ch. 23.3 - Prob. 2SR

The underlying premises and definitions that shape the arguments based on the warning of ecologists that people are using up irreplaceable natural resources and the response of economists that ingenuity and enterprise would find substitutes for most resources.

The underlying premises and definitions that shape the arguments based on the warning of ecologists that people are using up irreplaceable natural resources and the response of economists that ingenuity and enterprise would find substitutes for most resources.

Answer to Problem 23.1CTDQ

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 23 Solutions