
The average wealth.

Explanation of Solution
Table -1 shows the median and average family wealth and survey years from 1995-2010.
Table – 1
Year | Median | Average |
1995 | $84,000 | $307,900 |
1998 | 98,100 | 386,700 |
2001 | 106,100 | 487,000 |
2004 | 107,200 | 517,100 |
2007 | 126,400 | 584,600 |
2010 | 77,300 | 498,800 |
203 | 76,000 | 500,400 |
The average wealth in 1995 can be calculated as follows:
Hence, the average wealth was 3.67 times greater than median wealth in 1995.
The average wealth in 1998 can be calculated as follows.
Hence, the average wealth was 3.94 times greater than median wealth in 1998.
The average wealth in 2001 can be calculated as follows:
Hence, the average wealth was 4.95 times greater than median wealth in 2001.
The average wealth in 2004 can be calculated as follows.
Hence, the average wealth was 4.82 times greater than median wealth in 2004.
The average wealth in 2007 can be calculated as follows:
Hence, the average wealth was 4.63 times greater than median wealth in 2007.
The average wealth in 2010 can be calculated as follows.
Hence, the average wealth was 6.45 times greater than median wealth in 2010.
After 1995, 10% of the top wealthy people have seen an increase in their wealth disproportionately in comparison to the reaming 90%. The reason for this has been higher inequality in income, gains from stock market and tax cut that help the wealthy to increase their wealth.
As we can find a disincentive in work for public assistance, similarly inheritance might have a negative incentive on whosoever receives it. At the same time, people who work hard and save money think that they should have the rights to pass on their wealth to their successors. So, instead of cancelling the tax it’s better to bring changes in the tax. The changes for example can be to increase the limit of the amount of wealth that is allowed to be inherited and then apply an estate tax.
Concept Introduction:
Wealth: It is established by calculating the total market value of all physical and indefinable assets owned by subtracting these with all debts.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- Use a game tree to illustrate why an aircraft manufacturer may price below the current marginal cost in the short run if it has a steep learning curve. (Hint: Show that learning by doing lowers its cost in the second period.) Part 2 Assume for simplicity the game tree is illustrated in the figure to the right. Pricing below marginal cost reduces profits but gives the incumbent a cost advantage over potential rivals. What is the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium?arrow_forwardAnswerarrow_forwardM” method Given the following model, solve by the method of “M”. (see image)arrow_forward
- As indicated in the attached image, U.S. earnings for high- and low-skill workers as measured by educational attainment began diverging in the 1980s. The remaining questions in this problem set use the model for the labor market developed in class to walk through potential explanations for this trend. 1. Assume that there are just two types of workers, low- and high-skill. As a result, there are two labor markets: supply and demand for low-skill workers and supply and demand for high-skill workers. Using two carefully drawn labor-market figures, show that an increase in the demand for high skill workers can explain an increase in the relative wage of high-skill workers. 2. Using the same assumptions as in the previous question, use two carefully drawn labor-market figures to show that an increase in the supply of low-skill workers can explain an increase in the relative wage of high-skill workers.arrow_forwardPublished in 1980, the book Free to Choose discusses how economists Milton Friedman and Rose Friedman proposed a one-sided view of the benefits of a voucher system. However, there are other economists who disagree about the potential effects of a voucher system.arrow_forwardThe following diagram illustrates the demand and marginal revenue curves facing a monopoly in an industry with no economies or diseconomies of scale. In the short and long run, MC = ATC. a. Calculate the values of profit, consumer surplus, and deadweight loss, and illustrate these on the graph. b. Repeat the calculations in part a, but now assume the monopoly is able to practice perfect price discrimination.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





