Subpart (a):
The preventive health care cost effectiveness.
Subpart (a):

Answer to Problem 3P
The total cost of 100 tests is $10,000. The total future medical expense averted is $15,000. The medical expense saved after setting up of the screening system is $5,000.
Explanation of Solution
The preventive health care measures are those medical precautionary measures which help the people to stay healthy and free from diseases. The screening system helps the people to easily identify and detect various diseases in their early stages which will help them to treat the diseases easily and affordably without much hassle.
The cost of one screening test is $100 according to the given information and the number of persons taking the screening test is 100. Thus, the total cost of taking the medical screening test can be calculated by multiplying the cost per screening test with the total number of persons taking the screening test as follows:
Thus, the total expense of 100 screening tests is $10,000.
The given percentage of persons having the test result positive is 15%. Thus, the total number of persons having positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the total number of persons with the given percentage as follows:
Thus, there will be 15 persons having the positive results from the screening test.
The amount of the future medical expense saved by the individual when the test result is positive is $1,000. Thus, the total future medical expense that can be saved by the people having the positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the per person medical expense saved with the total number of persons having positive test results as follows:
Thus, the total future medical expense saved by the persons having the positive test results is $15,000.
The cost of setting up the screening system is $10,000 and the total future medical expense saved is $15,000. Thus, the net future medical expense saved can be calculated by subtracting the cost of setting up the screening system from the total medical expense saved as follows:
Thus, the net medical expense saved after reducing the cost of setting up the screening test is $5,000.
Concept introduction:
Preventive health care: They are the measures taken in order to prevent the occurrence of a disease rather than treatment of a disease.
Sub part (b):
The net medical expense loss after reducing the cost of screening test.
Sub part (b):

Answer to Problem 3P
The total cost of 100 tests is $10,000. The total future medical expense averted is $5,000. The medical expense lost after setting up of the screening system is -$5,000.
Explanation of Solution
The cost of one screening test is $100 according to the given information and the number of persons taking the screening test is 100. Thus, the total cost of taking the medical screening test can be calculated by multiplying the cost per screening test with the total number of persons taking the screening test as follows:
Thus, the total expense for 100 screening tests is $10,000.
The given percentage of persons having the test result as positive is 5%. Thus, the total number of persons having positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the total number of persons with the given percentage as follows:
Thus, there will be 5 persons having the positive results from the screening test.
The amount of the future medical expense saved by the individual when the test result is positive is $1,000. Thus, the total future medical expense saved by the people having the positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the per person medical expense saved with the total number of persons having positive test results as follows:
Thus, the total future medical expense saved by the persons having the positive test results is $5,000.
The cost of setting up the screening system is $10,000 and the total future medical expense saved is $5,000. Thus, the net future medical expense saved can be calculated by subtracting the cost of setting up the screening system from the total medical expense saved as follows:
Since the result is having a negative sign, it shows that the expense of setting up the screening system is higher than the benefit received from the use of the screening system. Thus, the net result is a loss. Thus, the net medical expense loss after reducing the cost of setting up the screening test is -$5,000.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 22 Solutions
EP ECONOMICS,AP EDITION-CONNECT ACCESS
- How is the mining industry related to other Canadian labour industries? Choose one other industry, (I chose Forestry)and describe how it is related to the mining industry. How do the two industries work together? Do they ever conflict, or do they work well together?arrow_forwardWhat is the primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary levels of mining in Canada For each level, describe what types of careers are the most common, and describe what stage your industry’s main resource is in during that stagearrow_forwardHow does the mining industry in canada contribute to the Canadian economy? Describe why your industry is so important to the Canadian economy What would happen if your industry disappeared, or suffered significant layoffs?arrow_forward
- What is already being done to make mining in canada more sustainable? What efforts are being made in order to make mining more sustainable?arrow_forwardWhat are the environmental challenges the canadian mining industry face? Discuss current challenges that mining faces with regard to the environmentarrow_forwardWhat sustainability efforts have been put forth in the mining industry in canada Are your industry’s resources renewable or non-renewable? How do you know? Describe your industry’s reclamation processarrow_forward
- How does oligopolies practice non-price competition in South Africa?arrow_forwardWhat are the advantages and disadvantages of oligopolies on the consumers, businesses and the economy as a whole?arrow_forward1. After the reopening of borders with mainland China following the COVID-19 lockdown, residents living near the border now have the option to shop for food on either side. In Hong Kong, the cost of food is at its listed price, while across the border in mainland China, the price is only half that of Hong Kong's. A recent report indicates a decline in food sales in Hong Kong post-reopening. ** Diagrams need not be to scale; Focus on accurately representing the relevant concepts and relationships rather than the exact proportions. (a) Using a diagram, explain why Hong Kong's food sales might have dropped after the border reopening. Assume that consumers are indifferent between purchasing food in Hong Kong or mainland China, and therefore, their indifference curves have a slope of one like below. Additionally, consider that there are no transport costs and the daily food budget for consumers is identical whether they shop in Hong Kong or mainland China. I 3. 14 (b) In response to the…arrow_forward
- 2. Health Food Company is a well-known global brand that specializes in healthy and organic food products. One of their main products is organic chicken, which they source from small farmers in the area. Health Food Company is the sole buyer of organic chicken in the market. (a) In the context of the organic chicken industry, what type of market structure is Health Food Company operating in? (b) Using a diagram, explain how the identified market structure affects the input pricing and output decisions of Health Food Company. Specifically, include the relevant curves and any key points such as the profit-maximizing price and quantity. () (c) How can encouraging small chicken farmers to form bargaining associations help improve their trade terms? Explain how this works by drawing on the graph in answer (b) to illustrate your answer.arrow_forward2. Suppose that a farmer has two ways to produce his crop. He can use a low-polluting technology with the marginal cost curve MCL or a high polluting technology with the marginal cost curve MCH. If the farmer uses the high-polluting technology, for each unit of quantity produced, one unit of pollution is also produced. Pollution causes pollution damages that are valued at $E per unit. The good produced can be sold in the market for $P per unit. P 1 MCH 0 Q₁ MCL Q2 E a. b. C. If there are no restrictions on the firm's choices, which technology will the farmer use and what quantity will he produce? Explain, referring to the area identified in the figure Given your response in part a, is it socially efficient for there to be no restriction on production? Explain, referring to the area identified in the figure If the government restricts production to Q1, what technology would the farmer choose? Would a socially efficient outcome be achieved? Explain, referring to the area identified in…arrow_forwardI need help in seeing how these are the answers. If you could please write down your steps so I can see how it's done please.arrow_forward
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax





