MICROECONOMICS-ACCESS CARD <CUSTOM>
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781266285097
Author: Colander
Publisher: MCG CUSTOM
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 22, Problem 26QE
To determine
Determine assumptions.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
The consumer theory and the expected utility theory are two theories. Give a policy recommendation
on how individuals decision making is affected in each theory.
Economics
Consider a potential criminal with a lawful income of $121. Potential loot from robbery is $75. The probability of being caught and imprisoned is 0.50 and a prison term for this type of crime is 0.33 units of time. Round to one decimal place in all calculations. Utility is given by: Utility = (income)1/2
A. Calculate the guaranteed utility from lawful income and the expected utility of committing the crime. What will the potential criminal do? Explain why. Would your answer change if there were an anguish cost of 1 util involved? Explain.
B. Suppose all the information given above holds true, except there is no anguish cost. You are a city official who has some extra room in the budget to dedicate towards fighting crime. For the use of these resources, you can choose between either increasing the length of prison term for criminals to 0.595 units of time or investing in GIS technologies and improved policing strategies that will increase the probability of criminals being…
Draw a utility function (with income on the horizontal axis) for an individual who is risk-loving at low levels of income, risk-neutral at moderate levels of income, and risk-averse at high levels of income (with each of these three regions clearly labeled). How would someone who looked at this graph (and had no other information about the individual) be able to figure out the individual’s attitude toward risk (averse/loving/neutral) in each region?
Chapter 22 Solutions
MICROECONOMICS-ACCESS CARD <CUSTOM>
Ch. 22.1 - Prob. 1QCh. 22.1 - Prob. 2QCh. 22.1 - Prob. 3QCh. 22.1 - Prob. 4QCh. 22.1 - Prob. 5QCh. 22.1 - Prob. 6QCh. 22.1 - Prob. 7QCh. 22.1 - Prob. 8QCh. 22.1 - Prob. 9QCh. 22.1 - Prob. 10Q
Ch. 22 - Prob. 1QECh. 22 - Prob. 2QECh. 22 - Prob. 3QECh. 22 - Prob. 4QECh. 22 - Prob. 5QECh. 22 - Prob. 6QECh. 22 - Prob. 7QECh. 22 - Prob. 8QECh. 22 - Prob. 9QECh. 22 - Prob. 10QECh. 22 - Prob. 11QECh. 22 - Prob. 12QECh. 22 - Prob. 13QECh. 22 - Prob. 14QECh. 22 - Prob. 15QECh. 22 - Prob. 16QECh. 22 - Prob. 17QECh. 22 - Prob. 18QECh. 22 - Prob. 19QECh. 22 - Prob. 20QECh. 22 - Prob. 21QECh. 22 - Prob. 22QECh. 22 - Prob. 23QECh. 22 - Prob. 24QECh. 22 - Prob. 25QECh. 22 - Prob. 26QECh. 22 - Prob. 1QAPCh. 22 - Prob. 2QAPCh. 22 - Prob. 3QAPCh. 22 - Prob. 4QAPCh. 22 - Prob. 1IPCh. 22 - Prob. 2IPCh. 22 - Prob. 3IPCh. 22 - Prob. 4IPCh. 22 - Prob. 5IPCh. 22 - Prob. 6IP
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Why do behavioral economists consider it helpful to base a theory of economic behavior on the actual mental processes that people use to make decisions? Why do neoclassical economists not care about whether a theory incorporates those actual mental processes?arrow_forwardWhat is incrementalism? How does it impact decision making? How does it differ from the rational-comprehensive theory? Provide an example.arrow_forwardAfter finishing high school, Klaus got a job selling towels to tourists in South Beach on the weekends. On a good weekend, he makes $450 and on bad ones, only $120. Assume good weekends and bad weekends are equally likely. If Klaus has a utility function u(x) = x0.5, what fixed salary with no risk would give him the same expected utility? a. $240.1 b. $246.5 c. $250.4 d. $258.7arrow_forward
- What is the foot-in-the-door technique? How does selfperception theory relate to this effect?arrow_forwardIdentify a personal economic decision that was driven by a behavioral bias rather than by pure rational behavior. Given your understanding of behavioral economics, how would your decision differ today? Please provide a detailed discussion. I will not give a positive rating for vague responses.arrow_forwardDo you believe in the principles of behavioral economics as the new way to guide economic thought and theory or are the fundamentals of traditional economics(eg. Efficient Markets Hypothesis) a necessary baseline which enables us to then understand deviations from rationality? Why? Give two examples of both real-life irrationality (behavioral economics) and rationality (traditional economics).arrow_forward
- On January 1st, 2022 every economics major at NYU had to choose one of the following two options: (a) take $10 today, (b) forgo $10 today, and get $15 on December 31st, 2022. Suppose John Doe, chose option (a), and picked up $10 on January 1st. Use this information to solve for John’s minimum discount rate. (Recall, r is the discount rate and (1 + r) is the discount factor.) Given the information above, what do we know about the discount rate of Jane Doe if she chose option (b)?arrow_forwardWhat is ability bias, example?arrow_forwardWhen consumers were given the opportunity to select a package of ground beef labeled “75% lean” or a package of ground beef labeled “25% fat,” most consumers chose “75% lean.” Why? What concept from the chapter does this illustrate? The reason is that consumers are swayed by cheap talk. Cheap talk is the concept. The reason is that consumers are much more likely to choose the alternative framed as the positive option. This is called a framing effect. The reason is that consumers infer the value of a product from positive advertising. This is called inference induction. The reason is that consumers respond better to higher numbers. They feel they are getting more because 75 is greater than 25. The concept is the endowment effect.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning