The expected years that the per capita income of the Democratic Republic of Congo will take to surpass the per capita income of the United States of America.
Concept Introduction:
The per capita income index is an indicator of how much an individual earns in comparison to his peers in an economy during a specific period of time. This indicator helps to understand the standard of living of individuals in different countries by comparing their average per capita income with one another.
Explanation of Solution
Where,
g = growth rate
t =number of years required
n = per capita income
Hence, in 171.70 years, the Democratic Republic of Congo’s per capita income will surpass the per capita income of the United States of America, if both the countries continue to grow at the current growth rate annually.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 21 Solutions
Econ Micro (book Only)
- An economy starts off with a GDP per capital of 12,000 euros. How large will the GDP per capita be if it grows at an annual rate of 3 for 10 years? 3 for 30 years? 6 for 30 years?arrow_forwardFor a high-income economy like the United States, what aggregate production function elements are most important in bringing about growth in GDP per capita? What about a middle-income country such as Brazil? A low-income country such as Niger?arrow_forward10) True or False: Countries that currently have low real GDPs per capita are destined to always have lower living standards than countries that currently have high real GDPs per capita.arrow_forward
- (6) GDP grows at 4 percent per year in Afghanistan and at 2 percent per year in Iraq. In 2016, GDP in Afghanistan was half as large as GDP in Irac, that is, YA2016/YIraq2016= 0.5. When will Afghanistan catch up with Iraq?arrow_forwardonly typed solutionarrow_forward11. The table below shows the average income per person in two countries in 1900 and their subsequent growth rates. Country Argentina Growth rate from 1900 to 2010 Income per person in 1900 $2756 $2758 1.03% Canada 2.19% The growth rates are only slightly different so maybe we should expect that they end up with similar, but not identical final incomes but they didn't. What was the absolute value of the difference in their incomes per person in 2010?arrow_forward
- Calculate approximately how many years it will take per capita GDP in the United States, Mexico, China, Rwanda, and Haiti to double, assuming that each country continues to grow at the same average rate as between 1960 an 2010. (Hint: Use the Rule of 70.) (Round your responses to one decimal place. Enter "−1" if a country will never double its GDP.) Implied (Average) Annual Growth (%) Years to Double United States 2.00 ? Mexico 1.79 ? China 4.72 ? Rwanda 0.60 ? Haiti −0.14 ? If the United States, Mexico, China, Rwanda, and Haiti continue to grow at the rates given in the exhibit, how many years (starting from 2010)would it take each to catch up to the United States in terms of per capita GDP? (Hint: If a country's GDP per capita is growing at a constant rate, g, then the natural log of GDP per capita t years into the future is: ln y(t) = ln y(0) + gt, where y(0) is GDP per…arrow_forwardSubject :- Echonomicarrow_forwardurgent need solve i will give upvote if u solve in one hourarrow_forward
- How much should a nation be concerned if its rate of economic growth is just 2 slower than other nations?arrow_forward7. Calculate the compound annual growth rates of goods exports and GDP of developed, developing countries, Canada and BRIC for the decade 2006-2016 (just use end years data to calculate the growth. Present your result either in a table or graphs. What do these growth rates tell about globalization vs. national economic growth rates for these groups? 8. How have US shares of Canada's exports, and imports of goods and services, and inward and outward FDI stock changed in the last two decades? Show with two graphs, one for trade and the other for FDI) Most of these data can be downloaded from World Bank, UNCTAD and CANSIM databases.arrow_forward6) There is such a close relationship between changes in a nation’s rate of productivity growth and changes in its average real hourly wage because if the average real hourly wage and output per worker is increasing, then the amount of output available per capita for workers to buy will be growing so more can be purchased. decreasing, then the amount of output available per capita for workers to buy will be less so more can be purchased. increasing, then the amount of output available per capita for workers to buy will be less so more can be purchased. decreasing, then the amount of output available per capita for workers to buy will be decreasing so more can be purchased.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStaxEssentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning