The income inequality in the US.
Explanation of Solution
Table -1 shows the distribution of US income by households in 2008:
Table -1
Personal Income Category | Percentage of all households in this category |
Under $10,000 | 7.1 |
$10,000-$14,999 | 5.8 |
$15,000-$24,999 | 11.8 |
$25,000-$34,999 | 10.9 |
$35,000-$49,999 | 14.0 |
$50,000-$99,999 | 17.9 |
$100,000 and above | 11.9 |
20.5 | |
100.0 |
As per table -1, the highest 20% have received an income share of 50% in 2008. This is ten times more than the 3.4% than the lowest 20% received. The three quintiles in the middle get less that 50% of the total income before tax. When we combine the bottom three quintiles on top of two quintiles that receive almost twice of them. So, the fact is that the top to 20% are receiving as much as 80% at the bottom.
The government's effect on the income distribution happens through taxes and transfer payments. It has a slightly progressive effect of federal, state, and local taxes on distribution of income as people with a high income have a pay of a higher percentage of their income in taxes when compared to people with a lower income. The main contribution of the government for income equality happens through transfer programs i.e. 80% of the times. The benefit of this contribution goes mainly to people in the lowest quintile where 75% of the income that these people earn is through government transfer payments.
Though these statistics may suggest that the government is contributing heavily to equalize the income, it might be all correct. As the transfer programs provided to people with a lower income decrease the incentive to work so the income earned will be further down. Also, not all these transfer programs got to the poor. For example, in case of subsidies, farming always goes to the farmers that are wealthy. Middle and higher class students get the benefit of education funding by the government than the ones with a lower income.
Concept Introduction:
Income inequality: It is the unequal distribution of a household or an individual income across the various participants in an economy.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 21 Solutions
EP ECONOMICS,AP EDITION-CONNECT ACCESS
- Problem 1: 1. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 forever, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 5%? 2. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 forever, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 8%? 3. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 this year, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 8% and dividends are expected to grow at a rate of 2% per year?arrow_forwardd-farrow_forwardG please!arrow_forward
- 4. Consider two polluting firms, with the marginal abatement costs of polluters 1 and 2, respectively, equal to MAC₁ = 20-E1 MAC2 = 12-E2 a. What is the unregulated level of pollution for each firm? b. Assume policymakers have decided to cut the level of pollution in half. The way they intend to accomplish this goal is to require both firms to cut their pollution in half. What are the total costs of abatement from the policy? And how are these costs distributed between the firms? c. Is this uniform quota on emissions across firms the most cost-effective manner in which to reduce emissions by 50%?arrow_forwardDon't used hand raiting and don't used Ai solutionarrow_forwardThanks in advance!arrow_forward
- I need help figuring this out. I'm pretty sure this is correct?If Zambia is open to international trade in oranges without any restrictions, it will import 180 tons of oranges.I can't figure these two out: 1) Suppose the Zambian government wants to reduce imports to exactly 60 tons of oranges to help domestic producers. A tariff of ???? per ton will achieve this. 2) A tariff set at this level would raise ????in revenue for the Zambian government.arrow_forward16:10 ← BEC 3701 - Assignments-... KWAME NKRUMAH UNIVERSITY TEACHING FOR EXCELLENCE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE ADVANCED MICRO-ECONOMICS (BEC 3701) Assignments INSTRUCTIONS: Check instructions below: LTE 1) Let u(q1,q2) = ln q₁ + q2 be the (direct) utility function, where q₁ and q2the two goods. Denote P₁ and P2 as the prices of those two goods and let M be per period money income. Derive each of the following: a) the ordinary or Marshallian demand functions q₁ = d₂ (P₁, P₂, M) for i = 1,2 [3 Marks] b) the compensated or Hicksian demand functions q₁ = h₂ (P₁, P2, M) for i = 1,2 [3 Marks] c) the Indirect Utility Function uº = v(P₁, P2, M) [3 Marks] d) the Expenditure Function E(P1, P2, U°) [3 Marks] e) Draw a diagram of the solution. There should be two graphs, one above the other; the first containing the indifference curves and budget constraint that characterize the solution to the consumer's choice problem; the second characterizing the demand…arrow_forwardHow would you answer the question in the News Wire “Future Living Standards”? Why?arrow_forward
- al Problems (v) T (ix) F 1. Out of total number of 2807 women, who were interviewed for employment in a textile factory, 912 were from textile areas and the rest from non-textile areas. Amongst the married women, who belonged to textile areas, 347 were having some work experience and 173 did not have work experience, while for non-textile areas the corresponding figures were 199 and 670 respectively. The total number of women having no experience was 1841 of whom 311 resided in textile areas. Of the total number of women, 1418 were unmarried and of these the number of women having experience in the textile and non-textile areas was 254 and 166 respectively. Tabulate the above information. [CA. (Foundation), May 2000 Exactly (14) of the total employees of a sugar mill were these were married and one-halfarrow_forwardHow did Jennifer Lopez use free enterprise to become successful ?arrow_forwardAn actuary analyzes a company’s annual personal auto claims, M and annual commercialauto claims, N . The analysis reveals that V ar(M ) = 1600, V ar(N ) = 900, and thecorrelation between M and N is ρ = 0.64. Compute V ar(M + N ).arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStaxPrinciples of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305971493Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781285165875Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning