Microeconomics
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781260507140
Author: David C. Colander
Publisher: McGraw Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 20, Problem 7QE
(a)
To determine
The dominant strategy of Players A and B.
(b)
To determine
The dominant strategy of Players A and B.
(c)
To determine
The dominant strategy of Players A and B.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Use the following payoff matrix to answer the questions below.
Cooperate
Defect
1
Cooperate
100, 100
40, 125
Defect
125, 40
50, 50
Which player (if any) has a Dominant Strategy?
[ Select ]
What is the Nash Equilibrium of this game? [ Select ]
Does this game satisfy the definition of a prisoner's dilemma? [ Select ]
Imagine two vendors (our players) who must simultaneously choose a location to position
their displays. There are n possible locations that form a straight line. Further, there is one customer at
each location, and customers will choose the closest vendor (and split their time at each vendor if they're
equally distanced from both). The profit for each vendor equals the number of customers they attract. Using
iterated elimination of dominated strategies (IEDS), what is the dominant strategy equilibrium? Explain.
2.
Here is a table representing the gains for the server if he serves on his opponent's forehand or backhand
and for the receiver the gains if he returns on his forehand or backhand.
Each player can choose to play the forehand or the backhand of the other player :
Server
D R
D 50,50 80, 20
R 90,10 |20, 80
Receiver
D
Determine the Nash equilibrium(s) (pure strategies and mixed strategies).
Chapter 20 Solutions
Microeconomics
Ch. 20.1 - Prob. 1QCh. 20.1 - Prob. 2QCh. 20.1 - Prob. 3QCh. 20.1 - Prob. 4QCh. 20.1 - Prob. 5QCh. 20.1 - Prob. 6QCh. 20.1 - Prob. 7QCh. 20.1 - Prob. 8QCh. 20.1 - Prob. 9QCh. 20.1 - Prob. 10Q
Ch. 20.A - Netflix and Hulu each expects profit to rise by...Ch. 20.A - Prob. 2QECh. 20 - Prob. 1QECh. 20 - Prob. 2QECh. 20 - Prob. 3QECh. 20 - Prob. 4QECh. 20 - Prob. 5QECh. 20 - Prob. 6QECh. 20 - Prob. 7QECh. 20 - Prob. 8QECh. 20 - Prob. 9QECh. 20 - Prob. 10QECh. 20 - Prob. 11QECh. 20 - Prob. 12QECh. 20 - Prob. 13QECh. 20 - Prob. 14QECh. 20 - Prob. 15QECh. 20 - Prob. 16QECh. 20 - Prob. 1QAPCh. 20 - Prob. 2QAPCh. 20 - Prob. 3QAPCh. 20 - Prob. 4QAPCh. 20 - Prob. 5QAPCh. 20 - Prob. 6QAPCh. 20 - Prob. 1IPCh. 20 - Prob. 2IPCh. 20 - Prob. 3IPCh. 20 - Prob. 4IPCh. 20 - Prob. 5IPCh. 20 - Prob. 6IPCh. 20 - Prob. 7IP
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- In the table below, it can be stated that it is the Nash Equilibrium: Regarding the game described by the matrix of possibilities below, it can be stated that the pair constitutes a Nash equilibrium:arrow_forwardConsider the following game matrix with two players- Player 1 and Player 2 with their respective strategies. Which of the following statements is correct such as x>y>b>a Players Player2 Player 1 A B C D (Y, Y) (b, x) (x, a) (AE) is the one of many Nash equilibria (C) is the unique Nash equilibria (C. D) is the unique Nash equilibria (A. E) and (B. F) are two Nash equilibria E (a, b) (x, y) (y, a) F (a,x) (a, b) (b, b)arrow_forwardSuppose that you and a friend play a matching pennies game in which each of you uncovers a penny. If both pennies show heads or both show tails, you keep both. If one shows heads and the other shows tails, your friend keeps them. Show the pay- off matrix. What, if any, is the pure-strategy Nash equilibrium to this game? Is there a mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium? If so, what is it?arrow_forward
- Consider the game shown below. In this game, players 1 and 2 must move at the same time without knowledge of the other player’s move. Player 1’s choices are shown in the row headings (A, B, C), Player 2’s choices are shown in the column headings (D, E, F). The first payoff is for the row player (Player 1) and the second payoff is for the column player (Player 2). Player 2 Player 1 D E F A 6, 8 4, 7 2, 9 B 2, 3 2, 6 4, 7 C 5, 4 7, 5 3, 6arrow_forwardConsider the game shown below. In this game, players 1 and 2 must move at the same time without knowledge of the other player’s move. Player 1’s choices are shown in the row headings (A, B, C, D), Player 2’s choices are shown in the column headings (E, F, G). The first payoff is for the row player (Player 1) and the second payoff is for the column player (Player 2). Player 2 Player 1 E F G A 2, 4 7, 7 2, 6 B 10, 6 1, 7 12, 4 C 4, 6 8, 8 7, 7 D 1, 6 3, 9 6, 7arrow_forwardQuestion 2: Consider two players, A and B, each of which can choose action X or Y. Their payoffs are represented in the following matrix, where K is a constant. Player A X Y X A: 15 B: 12 A: 20 B: 30 Player B Y A: 18 B: 24 A: 18 + K B: 22 Q2 a) First assume that K > 0. Does either player have a dominant strategy? If so, explain what it is and why. Q2 b) Again assuming that K > 0, explain with appropriate discussion what is the Nash equilibrium of this game. Q2 c) Now assume that K<0. Do players have dominant strategies and what is the Nash equilibrium in this case? Does your answer depend on the specific (negative) value of K? Explain the reason behind the differences between the results in point c) and those in points a) and b).arrow_forward
- Consider the payoff matrix below which shows the cleaning strategies of two roommates, Patrick and Cameron.arrow_forwardIn games with a Prisoners' Dilemma structure, we are often able to show cooperation emerging where the game is played repeatedly. We can explain this by assuming that A) Players enjoy being able to cooperate and so prefer not to defect. B) Players in such games expect that defection from the cooperative outcome will be punished in future C) Players can observe each others' actions, and so learn to trust them. D) Players are able to demonstrate that they are altruistic, and so cooperation is sustained.arrow_forwardSuppose that there are only two firms in a market in which demand is given by p = 64 - Q, where Q is the total production of the two firms. Each firm can choose either a low level of output, qL = 15, or a high level of output, qH = 20. The unit cost of production for both firms is $4. Write down the normal-form representation of the game in which the strategic variable for each firm is the quantity of output and the firms make their choices simultaneously. Find the pure strategy Nash equilibrium of this game (quantities produced and market price).arrow_forward
- The strategies and payoffs are given in the table. The first number of each payoff pair in the matrix is the payoff of player P1, and the second is the payoff of player P2. P2 Strategies Left Right P1 Up (2, 4) (1, 3) Strategies Down (1, 6) (6, 5) Select each pair of actions that would be a Nash Equilibrium of the above game. Up, Left Down, Left Up, Right Down, Rightarrow_forwardWhich of the following best defines a Nash Equilibrium? A) A situation where each player maximizes their own payoff without regard to the strategies of others. B) A situation where no player can improve their payoff by unilaterally changing their strategy. C) A situation where players cooperate to achieve the highest collective payoff. D) A situation where each players strategy maximizes the opponents payoff.arrow_forwardA payoff matrix is shown below. With the payoffs in each field indicated in the form (Player 1’s payoff, Player 2’s payoff). Player 2 Left Right Player 1 Up ($1, $1) ($2, $4) Down ($7, $8) ($3, $3) Which of the following is true? The only Nash Equilibrium is Player 1 playing ‘Up’ and Player 2 playing ‘Right’. The only Nash Equilibrium is Player 1 playing ‘Down’ and Player 2 playing ‘Left’. The only Nash Equilibrium is Player 1 playing ‘Down’ and Player 2 playing ‘Right’. None of the other answers provided are true.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Principles & PolicyEconomicsISBN:9781337794992Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. SolowPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Principles & Policy
Economics
ISBN:9781337794992
Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. Solow
Publisher:Cengage Learning