Case summary: To follow the safety measure, company D asked person F to wear steel-toed boots. F found out that one of his legs was sore and within a week he was diagnosed with MRSA infection. Person F then filed Workers Compensation Claim and company D defended that MSRA bacteria was already inside the skin of F before he arrived for the job.
To find: Necessary requirements to recover workers’ compensation benefits.
Case summary:To follow the safety measure, company D asked person F to wear steel-toed boots. F found out that one of his legs was sore and within a week he was diagnosed with MRSA infection. Person F then filed Workers Compensation Claim and D defended that MSRA bacteria was already inside the skin of F before he arrived for the job.
To find:Whether F is qualified to recover workers compensation benefit.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 20 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases
- Corey, who works as a mechanic, falls off a ladder, breaks his arm, and loses consciousness. Upon returning to the company post-treatment, the company transfers him to a different position. Does the company need to make a report under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA)?arrow_forwardExplain SIX [6] conditions under which whistle-blowing might be justified.arrow_forwardLisa applied and interviewed for a manager position at her company and was not selected. She was not given any feedback from the interview, Tony her male coworker was selected for the position. Lisa felt the promotion was unfair, since she had more seniority than Tony, and decided to file a gender discrimination and play with her local equal opportunity commissioner the EEOC investigated the complaint, and did not find any evidence of discrimination. Both Lisa and Tony’s employment was in good standing however, Tony had passed managerial experience, which was listed as a requirement on the job. This aspect, then made him a strong, stronger candidate for the job than Lisa, who had more seniority, but lacked the experience and the next several months, Lisa noticed the change from her manager prior to the complaint being filled he was very personable towards her and often made small talk around the office. After the complaint he was very short with her, and did not engage in any small…arrow_forward
- In response to illegal or unethical behaviors of local union officials, the Landrum-Griffin Act of 1959 allows: Union members to immediately decertify the union National unions to take over and replace elected local officials with an appointed trustee The NLRB to run an immediate election of new union officials Employers to step in on behalf of their workers and take over the unionarrow_forwardEmployee, a Muslim, is a management trainee at an airport car rental office. As part of her religious practice, employee wears a hijab (headscarf). She is told by her supervisor that the hijab does not match the uniforms she is required to wear, so she must stop wearing them or be transferred to another position with less customer interaction. Employee was later terminated as part of a company cutback. She sues for religious discrimination. Does she win? Explain.arrow_forwardThe union (Union) member-employees of the Erie Resistor Company (Company) struck Company over the terms of a new collective bargaining agreement that was being negotiated between Company and Union. Company continued production operations during the strike by hiring new hires and crossover union members who were persuaded to abandon the strike and come back to work. Company promised all replacement workers super seniority. This would take the form of adding twenty years to the length of a worker’s actual service for the purpose of future layoffs and recalls. Many union members accepted the offer. Union filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Is Company’s offer of the super seniority lawful? Explain your answer.arrow_forward
- World Color operated a printing plant. a written policy stated: “Baseball caps are prohibited except for [world Color] baseball caps.” The policy permitted employees to accessorize their uniforms “in good taste and in accordance with all safety rules.” The Graphic Communications Conference of the international Brotherhood of Teamsters filed an unfair labor practice charge with the NLRB claiming that the policy prohibited employees from wearing union insignia at work. it said world Color was interfering with its employees’ “right to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, . . . and to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining” as guaranteed by federal law. The NLRB agreed and world Color appealed. Was the baseball cap policy an unfair labor practice?arrow_forwardWhat are the implications of section 15(a)(3) of the Fair Labor and Standards Act (FLSA) for Suzy Smart? Section 15(a)(3) of the FLSA states that it is a violation for any person to “discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee because such employee has filed any complaint or instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under or related to this Act, or has testified or is about to testify in any such proceeding, or has served or is about to serve on an industry committee.”arrow_forwardWrite a termination letter to an employee guilty of corruption.arrow_forward
- In the senario below did the employer discriminate under the American with disabilites Act definition of disability, qualified individual or reasonable accomodation? Jane Flighty was fired after she fainted on the job because the company believed she was suffering froman unknown disability. After the fainting episode, she was sent to a physician. The physician’s initialdiagnosis was that Jane suffered from syncope, a loss of consciousness caused by a temporarydeficiency of blood supply to the brain. Later, the physician determined that the employee was withinnormal limits and that there was no explanation for the fainting. The company discharged Jane withoutany further medical examination, concluding that she was a safety risk because she was likely to faintagainarrow_forwardFurther in 1949, Congress amended the Fair Labor Standards Act (which regulates overtime) to read, “the hours for which an employee is employed, there shall be excluded any time spent in changing clothes or washing at the beginning or the end of each workday.”This law excluded “changing clothes” from compensable time, but is also specifically allowed collective bargaining agreements to specify that such time to be paid.Analyze the case in light of these two relevant laws. What characteristics or qualities should a practitioner look for in selecting a mediator to help resolve a labor dispute? What are some potential costs or risks parties face during a work stoppage?arrow_forwardAside from the legal requirements, how should the principles of justice shape any efforts by employers to monitor employees’ personal use of social media?arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education