
The comparative advantage of countries.

Answer to Problem 2P
a. New Zealand- The cost of producing 1 Apple is 0.25 plums and the cost of producing 1 plum is 4 Apples.
Spain- The cost of producing 1 Apple is 1 plum and the cost of producing 1 plum is 1 Apple.
b. New Zealand should produce apples and Spain should produce plums.
c. Graph
d. The total gain of Apples is 20 and the total gain of plums is 10.
Explanation of Solution
The comparative advantage is the advantage that the country has over the competitor in the
Option (a):
In New Zealand, the production of 20 apples needs the resources which can alternatively be used for the production of 5 plums. Thus, the opportunity cost of producing 1 apple can be calculated by dividing the total units of plums given up by the total units of apples gained as follows:
Thus, the opportunity cost of producing 1 apple in New Zealand is 0.25 plum.
The opportunity cost of producing plum in New Zealand can be calculated by dividing the number of units of apples given up with the number of units of plums gained as follows:
So, the opportunity cost of producing 1 plum in New Zealand is 4 apples.
In Spain, the production of 20 apples needs the resources which can alternatively be used for the production of 20 plums. Thus, the opportunity cost of producing 1 apple can be calculated by dividing the total units of plums given up by the total units of apples gained as follows:
Thus, the opportunity cost of producing 1 apple in Spain is 1 plum.
The opportunity cost of producing plum in Spain can be calculated by dividing the number of units of apples given up with the number of units of plums gained as follows:
So, the opportunity cost of producing 1 plum in Spain is 1 apple.
Option (b):
The opportunity cost of producing a unit of apple is lower in New Zealand (0.25 Plum) compared to Spain (1 Plum). Thus, New Zealand should specialize in the production of apples.
The opportunity cost of producing a unit of plum is lower in Spain (1 Apple) compared to that in New Zealand (4 Apples). Thus, Spain should specialize in the production of plums.
Option (c):
Before the trade, the
According to the terms of trade of
Similarly, Spain can have 2 apples for 1 plum in the international trade which will increase their total possible consumption of apples from 60 million bushels to 120 million bushels. Thus, the vertical intercept of the Spain's production possibility curve will increase to 120 million bushels. So, the slope of the production possibility curve of Spain will decrease from -1 to -0.5.
The changes are shown in the diagram as follows:
Option (d):
The mixed product of New Zealand is B and of Spain is S. According to the table, the total output of apples in New Zealand at this mixed product is 20 million bushels and the output of plums is 10 million bushels. Similarly, at the given output combination S of Spain, the total output of apples is 20 million bushes and of plums is 40 million bushels.
Thus, the total output of the apple and plum before the trade can be calculated by adding the individual quantities of apples that are produced in New Zealand and Spain together are as follows:
Thus, the total output of apples before the trade was 40 million bushels.
Similarly, the total output of plums can be calculated by adding together each country’s outputs are as follows:
Thus, the total output of plums before the trade was 50 million bushels.
After the specialization by New Zealand in the production of apples, the total output of apples increased to 60 million bushels. Similarly, the specialization by Spain in the production of plums increased the total output of plums to 60 million bushels. Thus, total
Thus, the total output gain of apples is 20 million bushels.
Similarly, the total output gain in the case of plums can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the total output gain in plums is 10 million bushels.
Concept introduction:
Comparative advantage: It is the ability of the producer, firm or a country to produce a good or service at the lowest opportunity cost of production than the competitors.
Specialization: It is the process of identifying the product in which, the country has the comparative advantage in the form of lower opportunity cost of production. Thus, they can focus on the production of that commodity which will increase the output and they can engage in an international exchange in order to obtain the products in which they don’t have any comparative advantage.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 20 Solutions
MACROECONOMICS (LL)
- 2. A firm’s production function is given by:Q = 10KLThe unit capital and labour costs are 2 and 1 pounds respectively. The firm is contracted to produce2000 units.(a) Write out the optimisation problem of the firm. (b) Express this problem using a Lagrangian function. (c) Find values of K and L which fulfil the contract with minimal cost to the firm. (d) Calculate the total cost to the firm.arrow_forward3. Consider the following estimated regression equation, estimated using a sample of firms, where RDis total firm spending on research and development in USD ($), Revenue is total firm revenuein USD ($), and W ages is the firms’ total spending on wages in USD ($) (standard errors inparentheses):RDd = 1000(600)+ 0.5(0.1)Revenue + 1.5(0.5)W ages,(a) Interpret the coefficients on each of the explanatory variables. (b) Which of the three coefficients are statistically significant at the 5% level of significance? Howdo you know? A researcher runs a two-sided statistical test of the null hypothesis that both the coefficients onthe explanatory variables above are jointly equal to 0.25 (mathematically, that β1 = β2 = 0.25),and reports a p-value of 0.045.(c) What does this p-value mean for the outcome of the test? (d) What would an appropriate two-sided alternative hypothesis look like?arrow_forward4. Consider the following regression equation, where Google is equal to 1 if an individual in thesample has worked at Google and 0 otherwise, and Earnings is annual earnings in thousands ofpounds (standard errors in parentheses):Earnings \ = 25000(12.5)+ 42000(7.0)Google,(a) Interpret the coefficient on Google.(b) Is the coefficient on Google statistically significant at the 5% level? How do you know?(c) Suppose that instead of Google we had used a variable called NeverGoogle, equal to 1 if anindividual has never worked at Google and 0 otherwise. (i) How would the slope coefficientchange? (ii) What would happen to the intercept? (d) What prevents us from interpreting the coefficient on Google as a causal effect? Give examplesin your answer.arrow_forward
- 4. Examine the regression table below before answering the questions that follow.Throughout, the Log() function represents the natural logarithm, so that Log(e) =1:Dependent Variable: Log(Expenditures on Cigarettes + 1)Method: Least SquaresVariable Coefficient Std. ErrorConstant 0.50 0.41Log(Income+1) −0.02 0.002(a) Why are the dependent and explanatory variables in the form log(1+x), ratherthan log(x)? (b) Which of the above coefficients are statistically significant? How do you know?(c) Interpret the coefficient on Log(Income+1). (d) What is the predicted level of Log(Expenditures on Cigarettes + 1) for anobserved individual with income of e10 − 1? (4arrow_forward3. Consider the following three (fictional) data points:Country Ultima Thule Narnia NeverlandGDP per capita (US $, 2021, in thousands) 10 30 20Deaths from COVID-19 as of Jan. 2023, millions 0.24 0.16 0.05(a) What is the slope of the line of best fit through these three points, whereDeaths from COVID-19 is the dependent variable and GDP per capita is theexplanatory variable? (b) The standard error for the slope parameter is 0.009. What does this standarderror measure? (c) Is the slope parameter statistically significant at the 5% level of significance?(The relevant critical value is not the usual value, but 4.303, due to the tinysample size). Explain what this means. (d) Why might this slope parameter be a misleading indicator of the relationshipbetween these two variables?arrow_forwardConsider the following estimated regression equation, where both Rent and Earnings aremeasured in pounds (£) at the individual level (standard errors in parentheses):log(\Rent) = 6.9(0.69)+ 0.9(0.3)log(Earnings),(a) Interpret the coefficient on log(Earnings). (b) If we divided Earnings by 1000, so that it is measured in 1000s of pounds instead of pounds,how would (i) the slope, (ii) the intercept change in the above equation? Now suppose the variable London is added, which is equal to one if an individual iives inLondon, and zero otherwise. The estimated regression equation changes to:log(\Rent) = 6.22(0.622)+ 0.5(0.05)log(Earnings) + 2(0.5)London,(c) Interpret the coefficient on London. (d) Explain why the coefficient on log(Earnings) when London is included in the regression andthe coefficient on log(Earnings) when London is not included in the regression are not thesame.arrow_forward
- 3. Consider the following regression equation, where Cigs is daily spending on cigarettes in poundssterling (£), Y earsEduc is years of education, and F emale equals one if an individual is femaleand zero otherwise (standard errors in parentheses):Cigs [ = 4(1.6)− 0.08(0.032)Y earsEduc − 0.5(0.2)F emale,(a) Interpret the coefficients on Y earsEduc and F emale. (b) What does the model predict the average daily spending on cigarettes would be for womenwith 12 years of education? (c) Form the 95% confidence interval for the coefficient on F emale. (d) Economists are often interested in estimating production functions of the Cobb-Douglas form(Yiis the ith firm’s output, Liits spending on labour, and Kiits spending on capital):Yi = ALαi Kβi,How might someone estimate α and β from this equation using linear regression?arrow_forward2. The demand and supply functions for two interdependent goods X and Y are givenbyQDX = 7 − 4PX + 2PYQSX = −6 + 4PX − PYQDY = 1 + PX − PYQSY = −4 − PX + 2PY(a) Find the market equilibrium condition for each good. (b) Express the equilibrium conditions in the matrix form Ax = b.(c) Find the inverse of matrix A. (d) Given your result in part (c), calculate the equilibrium prices. (e) What is the equilibrium quantity for goods X and Y ?arrow_forward2. A two-sector macro-economic model satisfies the following structural equations:Y = C + I∗C = aY + bwhere 0 < a < 1 and b > 0 are parameters and I∗ denotes investment.(a) What are the exogenous and endogenous variables in this model? (b) Re-arrange this system of equations to express the endogenous variables in terms of the exogenous variables and parameters. (c) Express this system of equations in the matrix form Ax = b. (d) Show that the inverse of matrix A exists.arrow_forward
- The equilibrium prices P1 and P2 for two goods satisfy the equations:−4P1 + P2 = −132P1 − 5P2 = −7(a) Express this system of equations in the matrix form Ax = b. (b) What is the determinant of matrix A? (c) Find the inverse of matrix A. (d) Using matrix algebra, calculate the equilibrium pricesarrow_forward1. An individual’s utility function is given as, where x1 and x2 denote the number of units consumedof goods 1 and 2 respectively:U = x121 x132,(a) Express the marginal utilities of x1 and x2. (b) Show that the marginal utility of x1 is positive and interpret this result. (c) Find the value of the marginal utilities when x1=16 and x2=8. (d) Find the marginal rate of commodity substitution at this point. (e) Estimate the change in utility when x1 and x2 both increase by 1 unit.arrow_forwardWhich of the following graphs best represents the production possibility frontier of Country Y (Line Y), the production possibility frontier of Country Z (Line Z), and the production possibility frontier of this whole economy (Line W)? (Hint: Find W by adding the productive capabilities of Country Y and Z) Group of answer choicesarrow_forward
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, IncEssentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningBrief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning





