
a.
Find the expected monetary value for each decision.
a.

Answer to Problem 11CE
The expected monetary value for the decision neither is $0.
The expected monetary value for the decision product 1 only is $76.
The expected monetary value for the decision product 2 only is $67.5.
The expected monetary value for the decision both only is $129.
Explanation of Solution
From the given information, the probabilities for the state of nature are
Then, the expected monetary value for the decision neither is calculated as follows:
Thus, the expected monetary value for the decision neither is $0.
The expected monetary value for the decision product 1 only is calculated as follows:
Thus, the expected monetary value for the decision product 1 only is $76.
The expected monetary value for the decision product 2 only is calculated as follows:
Thus, the expected monetary value for the decision product 2 only is $67.5.
The expected monetary value for the decision both only is calculated as follows:
Thus, the expected monetary value for the decision both only is $129.
b.
Give the recommended decision.
b.

Answer to Problem 11CE
The decision neither would be recommended.
Explanation of Solution
The expected monetary value for the decision both is greater when compared to the other decisions. But, the risk of loss is minimum for the decision neither. Then, the recommended decision is neither.
Thus, the decision neither would be recommended.
c.
Construct an opportunity loss table.
c.

Answer to Problem 11CE
An opportunity loss table is
Decision | Opportunity loss | ||
Neither | 220 | 110 | 40 |
Product 1 only | 95 | 45 | 10 |
Product 2 only | 115 | 50 | 10 |
Both | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Explanation of Solution
The opportunity loss table is obtained as follows:
Decision | Opportunity loss | ||
Neither | |||
Product 1 only | |||
Product 2 only | |||
Both |
From the given table if the decision is neither, then the value is 0 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $220 and $0 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is neither, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 1 only, then the value is 125 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $220 and $125 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 1 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 2 only, then the value is 105 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $220 and $105 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 2 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is both, then the value is 220 when the state of nature
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is both, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is neither, then the value is 0 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $110 and $0 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is neither, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 1 only, then the value is 65 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $110 and $65 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 1 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 2 only, then the value is 60 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $110 and $60 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 2 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is both, then the value is 110 when the state of nature
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is both, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is neither, then the value is 0 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $40 and $0 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is neither, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 1 only, then the value is 30 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $40 and $30 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 1 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is product 2 only, then the value is 30 when the state of nature
Then, the opportunity loss is obtained by taking the difference between $40 and $30 That is,
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is product 2 only, given a state of nature is
From the given table if the decision is both, then the value is 40 when the state of nature
Thus, the opportunity loss for the decision is both, given a state of nature is
d.
Find the expected opportunity loss for each decision.
d.

Answer to Problem 11CE
The expected opportunity loss for the decision neither is $129.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision product 1 only is $53.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision product 2 only is $61.5.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision both is $0.
Explanation of Solution
From the given information,
From the part c, the opportunity loss table is
Decision | Opportunity loss | ||
Neither | 220 | 110 | 40 |
Product 1 only | 95 | 45 | 10 |
Product 2 only | 115 | 50 | 10 |
Both | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Then, the expected opportunity loss for the decision neither is
Thus, the expected opportunity loss for the decision neither is $129.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision product 1 only is
Thus, the expected opportunity loss for the decision product 1 only is $53.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision product 2 only is
Thus, the expected opportunity loss for the decision product 2 only is $61.5.
The expected opportunity loss for the decision both is
Thus, the expected opportunity loss for the decision both is $0.
e.
Find the
e.

Answer to Problem 11CE
The expected value of perfect information is –6.
Explanation of Solution
The expected value of perfect information is obtained by taking the difference between the expected value under conditions of certainty and expected value under conditions of uncertainty.
From the opportunity loss table in the part c, in the state of nature
Thus, these are taken as the decisions.
The expected value under conditions of certainty is calculated as follows:
State of Nature | Decision | Payoff | Probability | Expected payoff |
Both | 200 | 0.30 | ||
Both | 110 | 0.50 | ||
Both | 40 | 0.20 |
Then, the expected value under conditions of certainty is obtained by adding 60, 55 and 8. That is,
Thus, the expected value under conditions of certainty is $123.
From the part d, the decision both is recommended, because its expected opportunity loss is less when compared to other decisions. From the part a, it’s expected payoff value is $129. This is the expected value under conditions of uncertainty.
The expected value of perfect information is
Thus, the expected value of perfect information is –6.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 20 Solutions
Gen Combo Ll Statistical Techniques In Business And Economics; Connect Ac
- When fitting the model E[Y] = Bo+B1x1,i + B2x2; to a set of n = 25 observations, the following results were obtained using the general linear model notation: and 25 219 10232 551 XTX = 219 10232 3055 133899 133899 6725688, XTY 7361 337051 (XX)-- 0.1132 -0.0044 -0.00008 -0.0044 0.0027 -0.00004 -0.00008 -0.00004 0.00000129, Construct a multiple linear regression model Yin terms of the explanatory variables 1,i, x2,i- a) What is the value of the least squares estimate of the regression coefficient for 1,+? Give your answer correct to 3 decimal places. B1 b) Given that SSR = 5550, and SST=5784. Calculate the value of the MSg correct to 2 decimal places. c) What is the F statistics for this model correct to 2 decimal places?arrow_forwardCalculate the sample mean and sample variance for the following frequency distribution of heart rates for a sample of American adults. If necessary, round to one more decimal place than the largest number of decimal places given in the data. Heart Rates in Beats per Minute Class Frequency 51-58 5 59-66 8 67-74 9 75-82 7 83-90 8arrow_forwardcan someone solvearrow_forward
- QUAT6221wA1 Accessibility Mode Immersiv Q.1.2 Match the definition in column X with the correct term in column Y. Two marks will be awarded for each correct answer. (20) COLUMN X Q.1.2.1 COLUMN Y Condenses sample data into a few summary A. Statistics measures Q.1.2.2 The collection of all possible observations that exist for the random variable under study. B. Descriptive statistics Q.1.2.3 Describes a characteristic of a sample. C. Ordinal-scaled data Q.1.2.4 The actual values or outcomes are recorded on a random variable. D. Inferential statistics 0.1.2.5 Categorical data, where the categories have an implied ranking. E. Data Q.1.2.6 A set of mathematically based tools & techniques that transform raw data into F. Statistical modelling information to support effective decision- making. 45 Q Search 28 # 00 8 LO 1 f F10 Prise 11+arrow_forwardStudents - Term 1 - Def X W QUAT6221wA1.docx X C Chat - Learn with Chegg | Cheg X | + w:/r/sites/TertiaryStudents/_layouts/15/Doc.aspx?sourcedoc=%7B2759DFAB-EA5E-4526-9991-9087A973B894% QUAT6221wA1 Accessibility Mode பg Immer The following table indicates the unit prices (in Rands) and quantities of three consumer products to be held in a supermarket warehouse in Lenasia over the time period from April to July 2025. APRIL 2025 JULY 2025 PRODUCT Unit Price (po) Quantity (q0)) Unit Price (p₁) Quantity (q1) Mineral Water R23.70 403 R25.70 423 H&S Shampoo R77.00 922 R79.40 899 Toilet Paper R106.50 725 R104.70 730 The Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd 2025 Q Search L W f Page 7 of 9arrow_forwardCOM WIth Chegg Cheg x + w:/r/sites/TertiaryStudents/_layouts/15/Doc.aspx?sourcedoc=%7B2759DFAB-EA5E-4526-9991-9087A973B894%. QUAT6221wA1 Accessibility Mode Immersi The following table indicates the unit prices (in Rands) and quantities of three meals sold every year by a small restaurant over the years 2023 and 2025. 2023 2025 MEAL Unit Price (po) Quantity (q0)) Unit Price (P₁) Quantity (q₁) Lasagne R125 1055 R145 1125 Pizza R110 2115 R130 2195 Pasta R95 1950 R120 2250 Q.2.1 Using 2023 as the base year, compute the individual price relatives in 2025 for (10) lasagne and pasta. Interpret each of your answers. 0.2.2 Using 2023 as the base year, compute the Laspeyres price index for all of the meals (8) for 2025. Interpret your answer. Q.2.3 Using 2023 as the base year, compute the Paasche price index for all of the meals (7) for 2025. Interpret your answer. Q Search L O W Larrow_forward
- QUAI6221wA1.docx X + int.com/:w:/r/sites/TertiaryStudents/_layouts/15/Doc.aspx?sourcedoc=%7B2759DFAB-EA5E-4526-9991-9087A973B894%7 26 QUAT6221wA1 Q.1.1.8 One advantage of primary data is that: (1) It is low quality (2) It is irrelevant to the purpose at hand (3) It is time-consuming to collect (4) None of the other options Accessibility Mode Immersive R Q.1.1.9 A sample of fifteen apples is selected from an orchard. We would refer to one of these apples as: (2) ھا (1) A parameter (2) A descriptive statistic (3) A statistical model A sampling unit Q.1.1.10 Categorical data, where the categories do not have implied ranking, is referred to as: (2) Search D (2) 1+ PrtSc Insert Delete F8 F10 F11 F12 Backspace 10 ENG USarrow_forwardepoint.com/:w:/r/sites/TertiaryStudents/_layouts/15/Doc.aspx?sourcedoc=%7B2759DFAB-EA5E-4526-9991-9087A 23;24; 25 R QUAT6221WA1 Accessibility Mode DE 2025 Q.1.1.4 Data obtained from outside an organisation is referred to as: (2) 45 (1) Outside data (2) External data (3) Primary data (4) Secondary data Q.1.1.5 Amongst other disadvantages, which type of data may not be problem-specific and/or may be out of date? W (2) E (1) Ordinal scaled data (2) Ratio scaled data (3) Quantitative, continuous data (4) None of the other options Search F8 F10 PrtSc Insert F11 F12 0 + /1 Backspaarrow_forward/r/sites/TertiaryStudents/_layouts/15/Doc.aspx?sourcedoc=%7B2759DFAB-EA5E-4526-9991-9087A973B894%7D&file=Qu Q.1.1.14 QUAT6221wA1 Accessibility Mode Immersive Reader You are the CFO of a company listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. The annual financial statements published by your company would be viewed by yourself as: (1) External data (2) Internal data (3) Nominal data (4) Secondary data Q.1.1.15 Data relevancy refers to the fact that data selected for analysis must be: (2) Q Search (1) Checked for errors and outliers (2) Obtained online (3) Problem specific (4) Obtained using algorithms U E (2) 100% 高 W ENG A US F10 点 F11 社 F12 PrtSc 11 + Insert Delete Backspacearrow_forward
- A client of a commercial rose grower has been keeping records on the shelf-life of a rose. The client sent the following frequency distribution to the grower. Rose Shelf-Life Days of Shelf-Life Frequency fi 1-5 2 6-10 4 11-15 7 16-20 6 21-25 26-30 5 2 Step 2 of 2: Calculate the population standard deviation for the shelf-life. Round your answer to two decimal places, if necessary.arrow_forwardA market research firm used a sample of individuals to rate the purchase potential of a particular product before and after the individuals saw a new television commercial about the product. The purchase potential ratings were based on a 0 to 10 scale, with higher values indicating a higher purchase potential. The null hypothesis stated that the mean rating "after" would be less than or equal to the mean rating "before." Rejection of this hypothesis would show that the commercial improved the mean purchase potential rating. Use = .05 and the following data to test the hypothesis and comment on the value of the commercial. Purchase Rating Purchase Rating Individual After Before Individual After Before 1 6 5 5 3 5 2 6 4 6 9 8 3 7 7 7 7 5 4 4 3 8 6 6 What are the hypotheses?H0: d Ha: d Compute (to 3 decimals).Compute sd (to 1 decimal). What is the p-value?The p-value is What is your decision?arrow_forwardWhy would you use a histograph or bar graph? Which would be better and why for the data shown.arrow_forward
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillTrigonometry (MindTap Course List)TrigonometryISBN:9781337278461Author:Ron LarsonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Mathematics For Machine TechnologyAdvanced MathISBN:9781337798310Author:Peterson, John.Publisher:Cengage Learning,




