EBK PRINCIPLES OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
EBK PRINCIPLES OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
11th Edition
ISBN: 9780135175859
Author: Munson
Publisher: VST
bartleby

Concept explainers

Question
Book Icon
Chapter 2, Problem 9P
Summary Introduction

To determine: The suitable outsourcing provider based on cultural risk factors using factor- rating method.

Introduction:

Factor-rating method:

The factor-rating method is a quantitative approach to make a decision from various alternatives such that the decision is beneficial to the firm involved. This method is utilized to decide on new layout, new locations, best supplier, outsourcing providers etc.

Expert Solution & Answer
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 9P

Ranga should select Mexico.

Explanation of Solution

Given information:

Current Selection Criterion Weight Mexico Panama Costa Rica Peru
Trust 0.4 1 2 2 1
Society value of quality work 0.2 7 10 9 10
Religious attitudes 0.1 3 3 3 5
Individualism attitudes 0.1 5 2 4 8
Time orientation attitudes 0.1 4 6 7 3
Uncertainty avoidance attitudes 0.1 3 2 4 2

Low Risk = 1

High Risk = 10

Formula to calculate weighted risk:

Weighted Risk = Weight × Risk rating

Formula to calculate Total weighted risk:

Total weighted risk = Individualweightedrisk

EBK PRINCIPLES OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, Chapter 2, Problem 9P , additional homework tip  1

Excel Formula:

EBK PRINCIPLES OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, Chapter 2, Problem 9P , additional homework tip  2

Excel Explanation:

Calculation of weighted risk for Mexico:

The weighted risk is calculated my multiplying the weights with risk rating of each criteria.

The weighted risk is calculated as follows:

Trust:

Trust = 0.4 × 1=0.4

The weighted risk for Trust is 0.4.

Society value of quality work:

Society value of quality  work = 0.2 × 7=1.4

The weighted risk for society value of quality work is 1.4.

Religious attitudes:

Religious attitudes = 0.1 × 3=0.3

The weighted risk for Religious attitudes is 0.3.

Individualism attitudes:

Individualism attitudes = 0.1 × 5=0.5

The weighted risk for Individualism attitudes is 0.5.

Time orientation attitudes:

Time orientation attitudes = 0.1 × 4=0.4

The weighted risk for Time orientation attitudes is 0.4.

Uncertainty avoidance attitudes:

Uncertainty avoidance attitudes = 0.1 × 3=0.3

The weighted risk for Uncertainty avoidance attitudes is 0.3.

Calculation of Total weighted risk:

The total weighted risk is calculated be summing all the weighted risk values.

Total weighted risk = 0.4 + 1.4 + 0.3 + 0.5 + 0.4 + 0.3= 3.3

The total weighted risk for Mexico is 3.3.

Calculation of weighted risk for Panama:

The weighted risk is calculated my multiplying the weights with risk rating of each criteria.

The weighted risk is calculated as follows:

Trust:

Trust = 0.4 × 2=0.8

The weighted risk for Trust is 0.8.

Society value of quality work:

Society value of quality  work = 0.2 × 10=2

The weighted risk for society value of quality work is 2.

Religious attitudes:

Religious attitudes = 0.1 × 3=0.3

The weighted risk for Religious attitudes is 0.3.

Individualism attitudes:

Individualism attitudes = 0.1 × 2=0.2

The weighted risk for Individualism attitudes is 0.2.

Time orientation attitudes:

Time orientation attitudes = 0.1 × 6=0.6

The weighted risk for Time orientation attitudes is 0.6.

Uncertainty avoidance attitudes:

Uncertainty avoidance attitudes = 0.1 × 2=0.2

The weighted risk for Uncertainty avoidance attitudes is 0.2.

Calculation of Total weighted risk:

The total weighted risk is calculated be summing all the weighted risk values.

Total weighted risk = 0.8 + 2 + 0.3 + 0.2 + 0.6 + 0.2= 4.1

The total weighted risk for Panama is 4.1.

Calculation of weighted risk for Costa Rica:

The weighted risk is calculated my multiplying the weights with risk rating of each criteria.

The weighted risk is calculated as follows:

Trust:

Trust = 0.4 × 2=0.8

The weighted risk for Trust is 0.8.

Society value of quality work:

Society value of quality  work = 0.2 × 9=1.8

The weighted risk for society value of quality work is 1.8.

Religious attitudes:

Religious attitudes = 0.1 × 3=0.3

The weighted risk for Religious attitudes is 0.3.

Individualism attitudes:

Individualism attitudes = 0.1 × 4=0.4

The weighted risk for Individualism attitudes is 0.4.

Time orientation attitudes:

Time orientation attitudes = 0.1 × 7=0.7

The weighted risk for Time orientation attitudes is 0.7.

Uncertainty avoidance attitudes:

Uncertainty avoidance attitudes = 0.1 × 4=0.4

The weighted risk for Uncertainty avoidance attitudes is 0.4.

Calculation of Total weighted risk:

The total weighted risk is calculated be summing all the weighted risk values.

Total weighted risk = 0.8 + 1.8 + 0.3 + 0.4 + 0.7 + 0.4= 4.4

The total weighted risk for Costa Rica is 4.4.

Calculation of weighted risk for Peru:

The weighted risk is calculated my multiplying the weights with risk rating of each criteria.

The weighted risk is calculated as follows:

Trust:

Trust = 0.4 × 1=0.4

The weighted risk for Trust is 0.4.

Society value of quality work:

Society value of quality  work = 0.2 × 10=2

The weighted risk for society value of quality work is 2.

Religious attitudes:

Religious attitudes = 0.1 × 5=0.5

The weighted risk for Religious attitudes is 0.5.

Individualism attitudes:

Individualism attitudes = 0.1 × 8=0.8

The weighted risk for Individualism attitudes is 0.8.

Time orientation attitudes:

Time orientation attitudes = 0.1 × 3=0.3

The weighted risk for Time orientation attitudes is 0.3.

Uncertainty avoidance attitudes:

Uncertainty avoidance attitudes = 0.1 × 2=0.2

The weighted risk for Uncertainty avoidance attitudes is 0.2.

Calculation of Total weighted risk:

The total weighted risk is calculated be summing all the weighted risk values.

Total weighted risk = 0.4 + 2 + 0.5 + 0.8 + 0.3 + 0.2= 4.2

The total weighted risk for Peru is 4.2.

The weighted risk value for Mexico is 3.3. The weighted risk value for Panama is 4.1. The weighted risk value for Costa Rica is 4.4. The weighted risk value for Peru is 4.2. Since, the risk value for Mexico is less (3.3 < 4.1, 4.4, 4.2), Mexico is selected.

Hence, Ranga should select Mexico.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
What is Bitcoin? How important is it to businesses and individuals? How does it cause environmental damage and is that damage worth continued uses of Bitcoin? Read the following articles to help answer these questions: United Nations University. (2023, October 24). UN study reveals the hidden environmental impacts of bitcoin: Carbon is not the only harmful by-product. https://unu.edu/press-release/un-study-reveals-hidden-environmental-impacts-bitcoin-carbon-not-only-harmful-product#:~:text=Bitcoin%2C%20the%20most%20popular%20cryptocurrency,the%20worldwide%20Bitcoin%20mining%20network. Salam, E. (2023, April 26). Bitcoin is terrible for the environment – can it ever go green? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/apr/26/bitcoin-mining-climate-crisis-environmental-impact
419 X .com/courses/1546/assignments/49499?module_item_id=111573 Unlimited Attempts Allowed ✓ Details Directions: Record a video of yourself giving a business presentation. Imagine you are tasked with researching a professional development topic on business communication for 40 coworkers. You are then expected to give a 4 - 5 minute presentation on the topic. Choose any topic related to business communication, such as intercultural communication, effective leadership, professional writing, etc. Research the topic and prepare a 4 - 5 minute presentation that could be given over video conference call (such as Zoom). You may use visual aids if you choose. Upload a video file of your presentation. Provide all needed citations. Requirements: 4-5 minutes long Contains visual and audio Create your own work; do not plagiarize Cite your sources using APA citations Choose a submission type T
acts Container chips (s 150 cussion: Conflict X + e.com/courses/1546/discussion_topics/15722?module_item_id=111559 24 Winter > Discussions > Week 8 Discussion: Conflict 时☆ 26 Replies, 26 Unread Week 8 Discussion: Conflict Write a 200 - 300 word discussion post based on the prompt below. Reply to at least one other student in 50 - 100 words. Can you think of a time when a conflict led to a new opportunity, better understanding, or other positive result? If not, think of a past conflict and imagine a positive outcome. Discuss the impact of this conflict on your workplace relationships, productivity, and innovation. Source: Business Communication for Success. (2015). University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. Attribution-NonCommerical-ShareAlike. Edit View Insert Format Tools Table 12ptv Paragraph BIUA T2
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Operations Management
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, operations-management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Marketing
Marketing
ISBN:9780357033791
Author:Pride, William M
Publisher:South Western Educational Publishing
Text book image
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
MARKETING 2018
Marketing
ISBN:9780357033753
Author:Pride
Publisher:CENGAGE L
Text book image
Principles of Management
Management
ISBN:9780998625768
Author:OpenStax
Publisher:OpenStax College
Text book image
Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)
Marketing
ISBN:9781337386920
Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. Kapoor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Foundations of Business - Standalone book (MindTa...
Marketing
ISBN:9781285193946
Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. Kapoor
Publisher:Cengage Learning