Concept explainers
To determine: The suitable outsourcing provider based on cultural risk factors using factor- rating method.
Introduction:
Factor-rating method:
The factor-rating method is a quantitative approach to make a decision from various alternatives such that the decision is beneficial to the firm involved. This method is utilized to decide on new layout, new locations, best supplier, outsourcing providers etc.
Answer to Problem 9P
Ranga should select Mexico.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Current Selection Criterion | Weight | Mexico | Panama | Costa Rica | Peru |
Trust | 0.4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Society value of quality work | 0.2 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 10 |
Religious attitudes | 0.1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
Individualism attitudes | 0.1 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
Time orientation attitudes | 0.1 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 3 |
Uncertainty avoidance attitudes | 0.1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
Low Risk = 1
High Risk = 10
Formula to calculate weighted risk:
Formula to calculate Total weighted risk:
Excel Formula:
Excel Explanation:
Calculation of weighted risk for Mexico:
The weighted risk is calculated my multiplying the weights with risk rating of each criteria.
The weighted risk is calculated as follows:
Trust:
The weighted risk for Trust is 0.4.
Society value of quality work:
The weighted risk for society value of quality work is 1.4.
Religious attitudes:
The weighted risk for Religious attitudes is 0.3.
Individualism attitudes:
The weighted risk for Individualism attitudes is 0.5.
Time orientation attitudes:
The weighted risk for Time orientation attitudes is 0.4.
Uncertainty avoidance attitudes:
The weighted risk for Uncertainty avoidance attitudes is 0.3.
Calculation of Total weighted risk:
The total weighted risk is calculated be summing all the weighted risk values.
The total weighted risk for Mexico is 3.3.
Calculation of weighted risk for Panama:
The weighted risk is calculated my multiplying the weights with risk rating of each criteria.
The weighted risk is calculated as follows:
Trust:
The weighted risk for Trust is 0.8.
Society value of quality work:
The weighted risk for society value of quality work is 2.
Religious attitudes:
The weighted risk for Religious attitudes is 0.3.
Individualism attitudes:
The weighted risk for Individualism attitudes is 0.2.
Time orientation attitudes:
The weighted risk for Time orientation attitudes is 0.6.
Uncertainty avoidance attitudes:
The weighted risk for Uncertainty avoidance attitudes is 0.2.
Calculation of Total weighted risk:
The total weighted risk is calculated be summing all the weighted risk values.
The total weighted risk for Panama is 4.1.
Calculation of weighted risk for Costa Rica:
The weighted risk is calculated my multiplying the weights with risk rating of each criteria.
The weighted risk is calculated as follows:
Trust:
The weighted risk for Trust is 0.8.
Society value of quality work:
The weighted risk for society value of quality work is 1.8.
Religious attitudes:
The weighted risk for Religious attitudes is 0.3.
Individualism attitudes:
The weighted risk for Individualism attitudes is 0.4.
Time orientation attitudes:
The weighted risk for Time orientation attitudes is 0.7.
Uncertainty avoidance attitudes:
The weighted risk for Uncertainty avoidance attitudes is 0.4.
Calculation of Total weighted risk:
The total weighted risk is calculated be summing all the weighted risk values.
The total weighted risk for Costa Rica is 4.4.
Calculation of weighted risk for Peru:
The weighted risk is calculated my multiplying the weights with risk rating of each criteria.
The weighted risk is calculated as follows:
Trust:
The weighted risk for Trust is 0.4.
Society value of quality work:
The weighted risk for society value of quality work is 2.
Religious attitudes:
The weighted risk for Religious attitudes is 0.5.
Individualism attitudes:
The weighted risk for Individualism attitudes is 0.8.
Time orientation attitudes:
The weighted risk for Time orientation attitudes is 0.3.
Uncertainty avoidance attitudes:
The weighted risk for Uncertainty avoidance attitudes is 0.2.
Calculation of Total weighted risk:
The total weighted risk is calculated be summing all the weighted risk values.
The total weighted risk for Peru is 4.2.
The weighted risk value for Mexico is 3.3. The weighted risk value for Panama is 4.1. The weighted risk value for Costa Rica is 4.4. The weighted risk value for Peru is 4.2. Since, the risk value for Mexico is less (3.3 < 4.1, 4.4, 4.2), Mexico is selected.
Hence, Ranga should select Mexico.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 2 Solutions
EBK PRINCIPLES OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
- How would you design and implement a modern networking solution for JAMS Manufacturing to connect all their facilities and ensure seamless communication? The company currently has standalone systems in three manufacturing plants and an office building, each using its own modem or router for internet access. The goal is to create private networks for each location, connect them to one another, and provide Internet access to all. You’ll need to consider factors like new computer systems, servers, and telecommunications wiring, and explain how your solution will benefit the company and how it will be implemented effectively.arrow_forwardIdentify specific performance management processes covered in this course and how each aligns with an elements of LaFevor’s HCMS Model.arrow_forwardIdentify specific performance management processes covered in this course and how each aligns with LaFevor’s HCMS Model. LaFevor, K. (2017). What’s in Your Human Capital Management Strategy? The Game Plan, the Path, and Achievingarrow_forward
- assess how Human Capital Management Strategy is aimed at building an effective integrated performance management system: Discuss how human capital management strategy relates to performance management.arrow_forwardCASE STUDY 9-1 Was Robert Eaton a Good Performance Management Leader? R obert Eaton was CEO and chairman of Chrys- ler from 1993 to 1998, replacing Lee Iacocca, who retired after serving in this capacity since 1978. Eaton then served as cochairman of the newly merged DaimlerChrysler organization from 1998 to 2000. In fact, Eaton was responsible for the sale of Chrysler Corporation to Daimler-Benz, thereby creating DaimlerChrysler. With 362,100 employees, DaimlerChrysler had achieved revenues of €136.4 billion in 2003. DaimlerChrysler's passenger car brands included Maybach, Mercedes-Benz, Chrysler, Jeep, Dodge, and Smart. Commercial vehicle brands included Mercedes-Benz, Freightliner, Sterling, Western Star, and Setra. From the beginning of his tenure as CEO, Eaton communicated with the people under him. He immediately shared his plans for the future with his top four executives, and upon the advice of his colleague, Bob Lutz, decided to look around the company before making any hasty…arrow_forwardCritically assess Martin’s coaching style.arrow_forward
- Compare Robert Eaton’s performance management leadership presented in the case against the performance management leadership principles, functions, and behaviors. What recommendations can be made about what he might do more effectively? Explain and defend your answer.arrow_forwardIn the context of the material in Chapter 9, provide a critical analysis of the decisions that Henry has made in assigning Martin to this role.arrow_forwardpanies (pp. 80-118). New York, NY: Times Books, specifically Chap. 4, "Robert Eaton and Robert Lutz; The Copilots." CASE STUDY 9-2 Performance Management Leadership at Henry's Commercial Sales and Leasing H enry is the owner of a small real estate agency that handles the sale and leasing of commercial property. He has two real estate agents working in the office, along with himself. He also has two customer service representatives (CSRs), each of whom has a real estate license, and one receptionist who has worked for the company for about three months. Henry has recently decided that he needs another customer service representative. He hasarrow_forward
- Discuss possible solutions to help Tara become an effective CSR. What should martin be doing to help her?arrow_forwardWhat are the ethical challenges regarding employees (i.e., diversity, discrimination, sexual harassment, privacy, employee theft, bad leadership, etc.) that Apple Inc. has faced over the past five to ten years and that they should prepare to face in the next five to ten years. Once a developed list of challenges is created, consider how having faced those challenges will impact and be impacted by the social cause you've selected. Propose the findings on the ethical challenges faced by Apple Inc. in recent history and the near future. Analyze ways in which each challenge was (and/or could be) appropriately handled and areas for improvement. Evaluate the ethical/moral aspects of Apple Inc. that protected it from ethical challenges in the past and could protect it in the future. Assess how ethical challenges and handling of ethical challenges could positively or negatively impact the charitable cause are selected and how the selection of your social cause could positively or negatively…arrow_forwardBy selecting Cigna Accredo pharmacy that i identify in my resand compare the current feedback system against the “Characteristics of a Good Multiple Source Feedback Systems” described in section 8-3-3. What can be improved? As a consultant, what recommendations would you make?arrow_forward
- MarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033791Author:Pride, William MPublisher:South Western Educational PublishingPurchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)MarketingISBN:9781337386920Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. KapoorPublisher:Cengage LearningFoundations of Business - Standalone book (MindTa...MarketingISBN:9781285193946Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. KapoorPublisher:Cengage Learning