
Concept explainers
To determine: The suitable outsourcing provider based on cultural risk factors using factor- rating method.
Introduction:
Factor-rating method:
The factor-rating method is a quantitative approach to make a decision from various alternatives such that the decision is beneficial to the firm involved. This method is utilized to decide on new layout, new locations, best supplier, outsourcing providers etc.

Answer to Problem 9P
Ranga should select Mexico.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Current Selection Criterion | Weight | Mexico | Panama | Costa Rica | Peru |
Trust | 0.4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Society value of quality work | 0.2 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 10 |
Religious attitudes | 0.1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
Individualism attitudes | 0.1 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
Time orientation attitudes | 0.1 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 3 |
Uncertainty avoidance attitudes | 0.1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
Low Risk = 1
High Risk = 10
Formula to calculate weighted risk:
Formula to calculate Total weighted risk:
Excel Formula:
Excel Explanation:
Calculation of weighted risk for Mexico:
The weighted risk is calculated my multiplying the weights with risk rating of each criteria.
The weighted risk is calculated as follows:
Trust:
The weighted risk for Trust is 0.4.
Society value of quality work:
The weighted risk for society value of quality work is 1.4.
Religious attitudes:
The weighted risk for Religious attitudes is 0.3.
Individualism attitudes:
The weighted risk for Individualism attitudes is 0.5.
Time orientation attitudes:
The weighted risk for Time orientation attitudes is 0.4.
Uncertainty avoidance attitudes:
The weighted risk for Uncertainty avoidance attitudes is 0.3.
Calculation of Total weighted risk:
The total weighted risk is calculated be summing all the weighted risk values.
The total weighted risk for Mexico is 3.3.
Calculation of weighted risk for Panama:
The weighted risk is calculated my multiplying the weights with risk rating of each criteria.
The weighted risk is calculated as follows:
Trust:
The weighted risk for Trust is 0.8.
Society value of quality work:
The weighted risk for society value of quality work is 2.
Religious attitudes:
The weighted risk for Religious attitudes is 0.3.
Individualism attitudes:
The weighted risk for Individualism attitudes is 0.2.
Time orientation attitudes:
The weighted risk for Time orientation attitudes is 0.6.
Uncertainty avoidance attitudes:
The weighted risk for Uncertainty avoidance attitudes is 0.2.
Calculation of Total weighted risk:
The total weighted risk is calculated be summing all the weighted risk values.
The total weighted risk for Panama is 4.1.
Calculation of weighted risk for Costa Rica:
The weighted risk is calculated my multiplying the weights with risk rating of each criteria.
The weighted risk is calculated as follows:
Trust:
The weighted risk for Trust is 0.8.
Society value of quality work:
The weighted risk for society value of quality work is 1.8.
Religious attitudes:
The weighted risk for Religious attitudes is 0.3.
Individualism attitudes:
The weighted risk for Individualism attitudes is 0.4.
Time orientation attitudes:
The weighted risk for Time orientation attitudes is 0.7.
Uncertainty avoidance attitudes:
The weighted risk for Uncertainty avoidance attitudes is 0.4.
Calculation of Total weighted risk:
The total weighted risk is calculated be summing all the weighted risk values.
The total weighted risk for Costa Rica is 4.4.
Calculation of weighted risk for Peru:
The weighted risk is calculated my multiplying the weights with risk rating of each criteria.
The weighted risk is calculated as follows:
Trust:
The weighted risk for Trust is 0.4.
Society value of quality work:
The weighted risk for society value of quality work is 2.
Religious attitudes:
The weighted risk for Religious attitudes is 0.5.
Individualism attitudes:
The weighted risk for Individualism attitudes is 0.8.
Time orientation attitudes:
The weighted risk for Time orientation attitudes is 0.3.
Uncertainty avoidance attitudes:
The weighted risk for Uncertainty avoidance attitudes is 0.2.
Calculation of Total weighted risk:
The total weighted risk is calculated be summing all the weighted risk values.
The total weighted risk for Peru is 4.2.
The weighted risk value for Mexico is 3.3. The weighted risk value for Panama is 4.1. The weighted risk value for Costa Rica is 4.4. The weighted risk value for Peru is 4.2. Since, the risk value for Mexico is less (3.3 < 4.1, 4.4, 4.2), Mexico is selected.
Hence, Ranga should select Mexico.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 2 Solutions
EBK PRINCIPLES OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
- Mcq question need ans.arrow_forwardSay women on average take twice as long in the restroom (not including waiting times) than men. Is the 2:1 ration for flushing capacity the right ratio?arrow_forwardTo what extent does the equation for the waiting time in the queue help explain why queues for the Women's room might be longer than queues for the Men's room before 2005 in New York City?arrow_forward
- Besides adding flushing capacity for the women's bathrooms versus men's bathrooms, what can be done to reduce waiting time for the restrooms?arrow_forwardHow does rework hurt a process? Give examples on how rework can hurt a process. Please provide a referencearrow_forwardHow does rework hurt a process? Give examples on how rework can hurt a process. Please provide a referencearrow_forward
- What the different between a near miss and hazard 1. movement and contact 2. Contact 3. movementarrow_forwardThe fixed and variable costs for three potential manufacturing plant sites for a rattan chair weaver are shown: Site Fixed Cost Per Year Variable Cost per Unit 1 $700 $12.00 2 $1,000 $7.00 $2,200 $5.00 a) After rounding to the nearest whole number, site 1 is best below After rounding to the nearest whole number, site 2 is best between After rounding to the nearest whole number, site 3 is best above b) If the demand is 590 units, then the best location for the potent 3 units. and units. 600 0 60 units. g plant isarrow_forwardRefer to Table S6.1 - Factors for Computing Control Chart Limits (3 sigma) for this problem. Sampling 4 pieces of precision-cut wire (to be used in computer assembly) every hour for the past 24 hours has produced the following results: Hour R Hour X R Hour X R Hour X R 1 3.25" 0.71" 7 3.15" 0.58" 13 3.11" 0.85" 19 4.51" 1.56" 2 3.20 1.18 8 2.65 1.08 14 2.83 1.31 20 2.79 1.14 3 3.12 1.38 9 15 4. 3.39 1.31 10 5 2.97 1.17 6 2.76 0.32 3.02 0.71 3.12 1.01 2.75 1.33 16 2.74 0.50 22 11 2.73 1.17 17 2.76 1.43 23 12 2.87 0.45 18 2.64 1.24 21 2.75 1.03 3.18 0.46 2.94 1.53 24 2.54 0.97 Based on the sampling done, the control limits for 3-sigma x chart are (round all intermediate calculations to three decimal places before proceeding with further calculations): Upper Control Limit (UCL) = inches (round your response to three decimal places). Lower Control Limit (LCL) = inches (round your response to three decimal places). Based on the x-chart, the wire cutting process has been The control limits…arrow_forward
- Choose a specific cars company. E.g Toyota, Volkswagen, Hyundai, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Honda, Ford, Audi, Tesla Define a list of required machinery, equipment, workstations, offices, rest areas, materials, etc. Develop and define the location of machinery, equipment, workstations, offices, rest areas, materials. Make the distribution in the manufacturing facility the most efficient way possible. Develop a process distribution for one specific product. Explain why you consider this is the most efficient distribution for this specific manufacturing facility. demonstrate the benefits of optimizing a production line with the best distribution of its equipment and spaces. To be more productive and profitable.arrow_forwardProvide a Synposis of the Articlearrow_forwardThe goal of understanding personality in negotiation is to better predict behavior, such as the counterparty's acceptance or rejection of a negotiation offer. One investigation used acoustic and visual cues to predict the likely behavior of a counterparty to a proposal. The best visual cue predictor of the counterparty (55%) was whether they _____. A. tilted their head B. had their arms and legs crossed C. steepled their fingers D. tapped a penarrow_forward
- MarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033791Author:Pride, William MPublisher:South Western Educational PublishingPurchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)MarketingISBN:9781337386920Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. KapoorPublisher:Cengage LearningFoundations of Business - Standalone book (MindTa...MarketingISBN:9781285193946Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. KapoorPublisher:Cengage Learning


