Your dormitory roommate plays loud music most of the time, you, however prefer more peace and quiet. You suggest that she buy some headphones. She responds that although she would be happy to use headphones, she has many other things that she would prefer to spend her money on right now. You discuss this situation with a friend who is an economics major. The following exchange takes place: He: How much would it cost to buy headphones? You: $15 He: How much do you value having some peace and quiet for the rest of the semester? You: $30 He: It is efficient for you to buy the headphones and give them to your roommate. You again more than you lose, the benefits exceed the cost. You should do that. You: It just isn’t fair that I have to pay for the headphones when I’m not the one making the noise. (a) Which part of the conversation is positive and which part is normative? (b) Construct different arguments based on different situations. Concept Information: Positive Economics: It is based on facts and purely objective. It describes the economic issues without judging them. It is also referred to as "the economics of what is". To determine whether a statement is positive or not, we must analyze that whether the statement can be falsified or not. If it can be tested and proven, it is a positive statement. Normative Economics: It not only focuses on the economic issues but it judges them as well. It is based on values. It is also called the "economics of what ought to be". To identify a normative statement, one should look for modal verbs such as should, ought, or must.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 2, Problem 9P

To determine

Your dormitory roommate plays loud music most of the time, you, however prefer more peace and quiet. You suggest that she buy some headphones. She responds that although she would be happy to use headphones, she has many other things that she would prefer to spend her money on right now. You discuss this situation with a friend who is an economics major. The following exchange takes place:

He: How much would it cost to buy headphones?

You: $15

He: How much do you value having some peace and quiet for the rest of the semester?

You: $30

He: It is efficient for you to buy the headphones and give them to your roommate. You again more than you lose, the benefits exceed the cost. You should do that.

You: It just isn’t fair that I have to pay for the headphones when I’m not the one making the noise.

(a)
Which part of the conversation is positive and which part is normative?
(b)
Construct different arguments based on different situations.
Concept Information:

Positive Economics:

It is based on facts and purely objective. It describes the economic issues without judging them. It is also referred to as "the economics of what is". To determine whether a statement is positive or not, we must analyze that whether the statement can be falsified or not. If it can be tested and proven, it is a positive statement.

Normative Economics:

It not only focuses on the economic issues but it judges them as well. It is based on values. It is also called the "economics of what ought to be". To identify a normative statement, one should look for modal verbs such as should, ought, or must.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

10.As COVID-19 came about, consumers' relationship with toilet paper changed and they found themselves desiring more than usual. Eventually, toilet paper producers saw an opportunity to make more money and meet the growing demand. Which best describes this scenario as depicted in Snell's 2020 article? A. The demand curve shifted left and the supply curve shifted left B. The demand curve shifted left and the supply curve shifted right C. The demand curve shifted right and the supply curve shifted left D. The demand curve shifted right and the supply curve shifted right

5. Supply and Demand. The graph below shows supply and demand curves for annual medical office visits. Using this graph, answer the questions below. P↑ $180 $150 $120 $90 $60 $30 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 a. If the market were free from government regulation, what would be the equilibrium price and quantity? b. Calculate total expenditures on office visits with this equilibrium price and quantity. c. If the government subsidized office visits and required that all consumers were to pay $30 per visit no matter what the actual cost, how many visits would consumers demand? d. What payment per visit would doctors require in order to supply that quantity of visits? e. Calculate total expenditures on office visits under the condition of this $30 co- payment. f. How do total expenditures with a co-payment of $30 compare to total expenditures without government involvement? Provide a numerical answer. Show your work.

4. The table below shows the labor requirements for Mr. and Mrs. Howell for pineapples and coconuts. Which is the most accurate statement? A. Mrs. Howell has a comparative advantage in coconuts and the opportunity cost of 1 coconut for Mrs. Howell is 4 pineapples B. Mrs. Howell has a comparative advantage in pineapples and the opportunity cost of 1 pineapple for Mrs. Howell is .25 coconuts. C. Mr. Howell has a comparative advantage in pineapples and the opportunity cost of 1 pineapple is 1 coconut. D. Mr. Howell has a comparative advantage in both pineapples and coconuts and should specialize in pineapples. Labor Requirements for Pineapples and Coconuts 1 Pineapple 1 Coconut Mr. Howell 1 hour 1 hour Mrs. Howell 1/2 hour 2 hours