
Concept explainers
Your dormitory roommate plays loud music most of the time, you, however prefer more peace and quiet. You suggest that she buy some headphones. She responds that although she would be happy to use headphones, she has many other things that she would prefer to spend her money on right now. You discuss this situation with a friend who is an economics major. The following exchange takes place:
He: How much would it cost to buy headphones?
You: $15
He: How much do you value having some peace and quiet for the rest of the semester?
You: $30
He: It is efficient for you to buy the headphones and give them to your roommate. You again more than you lose, the benefits exceed the cost. You should do that.
You: It just isn’t fair that I have to pay for the headphones when I’m not the one making the noise.
(a)
Which part of the conversation is positive and which part is normative?(b)
Construct different arguments based on different situations.Concept Information:
Positive Economics:
It is based on facts and purely objective. It describes the economic issues without judging them. It is also referred to as "the economics of what is". To determine whether a statement is positive or not, we must analyze that whether the statement can be falsified or not. If it can be tested and proven, it is a positive statement.
Normative Economics:
It not only focuses on the economic issues but it judges them as well. It is based on values. It is also called the "economics of what ought to be". To identify a normative statement, one should look for modal verbs such as should, ought, or must.

Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
- Fems A and B are duopolist producers of widgets. The cost function for producing widgets C(Q)-Q² The market demand function for widgets i Q-192P Qmeasures thousands of widgets per year, Competition in the widget market is described by the Coumot model Instructions: Round your answers to 2 decimal places a What are the firms' Nanh equbrium output? b. What is the resulting price? c. What do they each emp How does the price compare to marginal cost? Price is ck to marginal cost How do the price and the two fems' joint profit compare to the monopoly price and prof Compared to the monopoly price, the Cournot price is to sed. Compared to the monopoly profit, the joint profit of the two fems to selectarrow_forwardSuppose the marginal social cost of television sets is $100. This is constant and equal to the average cost of television sets. The annual demand for television sets is given by the following equation: Q = 200,000-500P, where Qis the quantity sold per year and P is the price of television sets. a) If television sets are sold in a perfectly competitive market, calculate the annual number sold. Under what circumstances will the market equilibrium be efficient? b) Show the losses in well-being each year that would result from a law limiting sales of television sets to 100,000 per year. Show the effect on the price, marginal social benefit, and marginal social cost of television sets. Show the net loss in well-being that will result from a complete ban on the sales of television sets. (show with graphs.)arrow_forwardrefer to exhibit 8.12 and identify each curve in the grapharrow_forward
- Q1. (Chap 1: Game Theory.) In the simultaneous games below player 1 is choosing between Top and Bottom, while player 2 is choosing between Left and Right. In each cell the first number is the payoff to player 1 and the second is the payoff to player 2. Part A: Player 1 Top Bottom Player 2 Left 25, 22 Right 27,23 26,21 28, 22 (A1) Does player 1 have a dominant strategy? (Yes/No) If your answer is yes, which one is it? (Top/Bottom) (A2) Does player 2 have a dominant strategy? (Yes/No.) If your answer is yes, which one is it? (Left/Right.) (A3) Can you solve this game by using the dominant strategy method? (Yes/No) If your answer is yes, what is the solution?arrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forwardsubject to X1 X2 Maximize dollars of interest earned = 0.07X1+0.11X2+0.19X3+0.15X4 ≤ 1,000,000 <2,500,000 X3 ≤ 1,500,000 X4 ≤ 1,800,000 X3 + XA ≥ 0.55 (X1+X2+X3+X4) X1 ≥ 0.15 (X1+X2+X3+X4) X1 + X2 X3 + XA < 5,000,000 X1, X2, X3, X4 ≥ 0arrow_forward
- Unit VI Assignment Instructions: This assignment has two parts. Answer the questions using the charts. Part 1: Firm 1 High Price Low Price High Price 8,8 0,10 Firm 2 Low Price 10,0 3,3 Question: For the above game, identify the Nash Equilibrium. Does Firm 1 have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? Does Firm 2 have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? Your response:arrow_forwardnot use ai please don't kdjdkdkfjnxncjcarrow_forwardAsk one question at a time. Keep questions specific and include all details. Need more help? Subject matter experts with PhDs and Masters are standing by 24/7 to answer your question.**arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





