
Concept explainers
Subpart (a):
The best production technique.
Subpart (a):

Explanation of Solution
The production technique is the allotment and arrangement of the economic resources as well as the other goods and services into the production of the consumer goods and services which optimizes the cost and allocates the resources in an efficient manner. In this case, each of the production technique produces $40 worth units of output and thus each are equally productive. Thus, the choice between the production techniques can be made on the basis of the total cost of production. The cost structure can be calculated as follows:
Resources |
| ||||||
Technique 1 | Technique 2 | Technique 3 | |||||
Units | Cost | Units | Cost | Units | Cost | ||
Labor | $3 | 5 | $15 | 2 | $6 | 3 | $9 |
Land | $4 | 2 | $8 | 4 | $16 | 2 | $8 |
Capital | $2 | 2 | $4 | 4 | $8 | 5 | $10 |
Entrepreneurial ability | $2 | 4 | $8 | 2 | $4 | 4 | $8 |
Total cost of $40 worth product | $35 | $34 | $35 |
The firm will always try to minimize its cost of production. Thus, when there are three equally productive techniques available with the firm, the firm will opt for the technique which has the least cost combination. Here, technique 2 is the least cost combination. Thus, the firm will choose technique 2 for the production.
Since, the total cost of production is $34 and the total revenue for the firm is $40, there is economic profit for the firm. The economic profit can be calculated by subtracting the total cost from the total revenue as follows:
Thus, there is a profit of $6 to the firm while choosing technique 2 for its production.
When there is economic profit, the firm will expand and the expansion will take place only until when there is economic profit. When the total cost and the total revenue becomes equal, the expansion will come to an end.
Concept introduction:
Production technique: The production technique can be considered as the arrangement of the factors of production and the resources into the production of the consumer goods in such a way that it minimizes the cost of production and maximizes the profit from the production and maintains the work flow of the business.
Subpart (b):
The choice of new technique of production.
Subpart (b):

Explanation of Solution
The introduced production technique 4 uses 2 units of labor, 2 units of land, 6 units of capital and 3 units of entrepreneurial ability respectively. Thus, the total cost of the new production technique can be calculated as follows:
Resource |
Price per unit of resource |
Technique 4 | |
Unit |
cost | ||
Labor | $3 | 2 | $6 |
Land | $4 | 2 | $8 |
Capital | $2 | 6 | $12 |
Entrepreneurial ability | $2 | 3 | $6 |
Total cost of $40 worth product | $32 |
Since, the total cost of production using the technique 4 is lower than the total cost of production of all other three techniques of production, the firm will choose the technique 4 as the production technique.
Concept introduction:
Production technique: The production technique can be considered as the arrangement of the factors of production and the resources into the production of the consumer goods in such a way that it minimizes the cost of production and maximizes the profit from the production and maintains the work flow of the business.
Subpart (c):
The Least cost combination of production technique.
Subpart (c):

Explanation of Solution
When the price of labor falls from $3 to $1.5, it will change the total cost of production of all the production techniques available with the firm. Thus, the new cost structures of the production techniques of the firm can be calculated as follows:
Resources |
Price per unit of Resource | ||||||
Technique 1 | Technique 2 | Technique 3 | |||||
Units | Cost | Units | Cost | Units | Cost | ||
Labor | $1.5 | 5 | $7.5 | 2 | $3 | 3 | $4.5 |
Land | $4 | 2 | $8 | 4 | $16 | 2 | $8 |
Capital | $2 | 2 | $4 | 4 | $8 | 5 | $10 |
Entrepreneurial ability | $2 | 4 | $8 | 2 | $4 | 4 | $8 |
Total cost of $40 worth product | $27.5 | $31 | $30.5 |
From the table above, it can be easily identify that the technique which incurs lower cost of production will be the least cost combination. Here, it is the technique 1 which incurs lower price of production when price of labor decreases to $1.5 from $3. Thus, the firm will choose production technique 1.
Concept Introduction:
Production technique: The production technique can be considered as the arrangement of the factors of production and the resources into the production of the consumer goods in such a way that it minimizes the cost of production and maximizes the profit from the production and keeps the work flow of the business.
Subpart (d):
The best production technique.
Subpart (d):

Explanation of Solution
When the resources become scarce, it will lead to the mismatch between the
When the firms are not considering the price of the resources, then the cost of production of the firms will increase. The firms who use the lower price resources become the lower cost producers. The profit of the lower cost producers will be higher.
Thus, the market structure forces the firms to conserve on the use of the highly scarce resources.
Concept Introduction:
Scarcity of Resources: It is the state in which there is a shortage of the resources or there is no adequate quantity of resources available to meet the demand.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 2 Solutions
EBK ECONOMICS
- 1. Suppose that the two nations face the following benefits of pollution, B, and costs of abatement, C: BN = 10, Bs = 7; CN = 5, Cs = 4. Further assume that if the nation chooses to abate pollution, it still receives the benefits of pollution but now must pay the cost of abatement as well. a. Identify the payoffs that accrue to each nation under the four different possible outcomes of the game and present these payoffs in the normal form of the game. b. Recall that the term dominant strategy defines the condition that a player in a game would prefer to play that strategy (in this case either pollute or abate) regardless of the strategy chosen by the other player in the game. Does either nation have a dominant strategy in this game? If so, what is it? c. Identify the Nash equilibria, or non-cooperative equilibria, of this game.arrow_forwardagrody calming Inted 001 and me 2. A homeowner is concerned about the various air pollutants (e.g., benzene and methane) released in her house when she cooks with natural gas. She is considering replacing her gas oven and stove with an electric stove comprising an induction cooktop and convection oven. The new appliance costs $900 to purchase and install. Capping the old gas line costs an additional $150 (a one-time fee). The old line must be inspected for leaks each year after capping, at a cost of $35 for each inspection. a. If the homeowner plans to remain in the house for four more years and the discount rate is 4%, what is the minimum present value of the benefits that the homeowner would need to experience for this purchase to be justified based on its private net sub present value? b. While trying to understand how she might express the value of reduced exposure to indoor air pollutants in dollar terms, the homeowner consulted the EPA website and found estimates provided by…arrow_forwardAfter the ban is imposed, Joe’s firm switches to the more expensive biodegradable disposable cups. This increases the cost associated with each cup of coffee it produces. Which cost curve(s) will be impacted by the use of the more expensive biodegradable disposable cups? Why? Which cost curve(s) will not shift, and why not? Please use the table below to answer this question. For the second column (“Impacted? If so, how?”), please use one of the following three choices: No shift; Shifts up (i.e., increases: at nearly any given quantity, the cost goes up); or Shifts down (i.e., decreases: at nearly any given quantity, the cost goes down). $ Cost Curve Impacted? If so, how? Explanation of the Shift: Why or Why Not AFC No shift. Fix costs stay the same, regardless of quantity. Fixed cost is calculated as Fixed Cost/Quantity. Since fixed costs remain unchanged, AFC stays the same for each quantity. MC Shifts up. Since the biodegradable cups are more expensive, the…arrow_forward
- Styrofoam is non-biodegradable and is not easily recyclable. Many cities and at least one state have enacted laws that ban the use of polystyrene containers. These locales understand that banning these containers will force many businesses to turn to other more expensive forms of packaging and cups, but argue the ban is environmentally important. Shane owns a firm with a conventional production function resulting in U-shaped ATC, AVC, and MC curves. Shane's business sells takeout food and drinks that are currently packaged in styrofoam containers and cups. Graph the short-run AFC0, AVC0, ATC0, and MC0 curves for Shane's firm before the ban on using styrofoam containers.arrow_forwardd-farrow_forwarda-c pleasearrow_forward
- d-farrow_forwardPART II: Multipart Problems wood or solem of triflussd aidi 1. Assume that a society has a polluting industry comprising two firms, where the industry-level marginal abatement cost curve is given by: MAC = 24 - ()E and the marginal damage function is given by: MDF = 2E. What is the efficient level of emissions? b. What constant per-unit emissions tax could achieve the efficient emissions level? points) c. What is the net benefit to society of moving from the unregulated emissions level to the efficient level? In response to industry complaints about the costs of the tax, a cap-and-trade program is proposed. The marginal abatement cost curves for the two firms are given by: MAC=24-E and MAC2 = 24-2E2. d. How could a cap-and-trade program that achieves the same level of emissions as the tax be designed to reduce the costs of regulation to the two firms?arrow_forwardOnly #4 please, Use a graph please if needed to help provearrow_forward
- a-carrow_forwardFor these questions, you must state "true," "false," or "uncertain" and argue your case (roughly 3 to 5 sentences). When appropriate, the use of graphs will make for stronger answers. Credit will depend entirely on the quality of your explanation. 1. If the industry facing regulation for its pollutant emissions has a lot of political capital, direct regulatory intervention will be more viable than an emissions tax to address this market failure. 2. A stated-preference method will provide a measure of the value of Komodo dragons that is more accurate than the value estimated through application of the travel cost model to visitation data for Komodo National Park in Indonesia. 3. A correlation between community demographics and the present location of polluting facilities is sufficient to claim a violation of distributive justice. olsvrc Q 4. When the damages from pollution are uncertain, a price-based mechanism is best equipped to manage the costs of the regulator's imperfect…arrow_forwardFor environmental economics, question number 2 only please-- thank you!arrow_forward
- Principles of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781285165875Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning




