Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D. Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it. The characters in the case are given below: Person MS: The patient Nurse D To discuss: The source of knowledge used by the nursing student.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 2, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The source of knowledge used by the nursing student.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether the nursing student used theory or research and reason.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether therapeutic touch is an evidence-based practice.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The manner in which patient culture has been affected.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether the patient is harmed by the use of a new mediation such as therapeutic touch.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The safety that exists in this practice to prevent from reckless experimentation on the patient.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

On what should Person X base the judgment.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

how can we fix abnormal vital signs?

Data were measured in 15 college seniors (n = 15) in a cross-sectional study of alcohol consumption. Each participant was asked their sex, year in school, the age at which they first consumed alcohol, and the number of alcoholic drinks they consume on a typical drinking night. The data are shown in Table 3.4. Generate frequency distribution tables for sex and year in school using the Data/Pivot Table and Pivot Chart Report option on the menu bar.

Generate a frequency bar chart for sex using the frequency distribution table from Problem 1.

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 2, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The source of knowledge used by the nursing student.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether the nursing student used theory or research and reason.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether therapeutic touch is an evidence-based practice.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The manner in which patient culture has been affected.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether the patient is harmed by the use of a new mediation such as therapeutic touch.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The safety that exists in this practice to prevent from reckless experimentation on the patient.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

On what should Person X base the judgment.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 2, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The source of knowledge used by the nursing student.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether the nursing student used theory or research and reason.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether therapeutic touch is an evidence-based practice.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The manner in which patient culture has been affected.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether the patient is harmed by the use of a new mediation such as therapeutic touch.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The safety that exists in this practice to prevent from reckless experimentation on the patient.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

On what should Person X base the judgment.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 2, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The source of knowledge used by the nursing student.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether the nursing student used theory or research and reason.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether therapeutic touch is an evidence-based practice.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The manner in which patient culture has been affected.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether the patient is harmed by the use of a new mediation such as therapeutic touch.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The safety that exists in this practice to prevent from reckless experimentation on the patient.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

On what should Person X base the judgment.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 5

Chapter 2, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The source of knowledge used by the nursing student.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether the nursing student used theory or research and reason.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether therapeutic touch is an evidence-based practice.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The manner in which patient culture has been affected.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether the patient is harmed by the use of a new mediation such as therapeutic touch.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The safety that exists in this practice to prevent from reckless experimentation on the patient.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

On what should Person X base the judgment.

Answer 6

Chapter 2, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The source of knowledge used by the nursing student.

Answer 7

Chapter 2, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The source of knowledge used by the nursing student.

Answer 8

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether the nursing student used theory or research and reason.

Answer 9

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether the nursing student used theory or research and reason.

Answer 10

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether therapeutic touch is an evidence-based practice.

Answer 11

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether therapeutic touch is an evidence-based practice.

Answer 12

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The manner in which patient culture has been affected.

Answer 13

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The manner in which patient culture has been affected.

Answer 14

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether the patient is harmed by the use of a new mediation such as therapeutic touch.

Answer 15

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

Whether the patient is harmed by the use of a new mediation such as therapeutic touch.

Answer 16

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The safety that exists in this practice to prevent from reckless experimentation on the patient.

Answer 17

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

The safety that exists in this practice to prevent from reckless experimentation on the patient.

Answer 18

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

On what should Person X base the judgment.

Answer 19

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Nurse D underwent a course in therapeutic touch. When she came back to work, she was eagerly waiting to use the new technique on the patient. Patient MS has undergone the abdominal surgery. When the patient came back, she explained about nausea to Nurse D.

Nurse D used a new technique called “unruffling” to calm down the patient and later, nausea disappeared. This technique showed a good result but there was no scientific support to prove it.

The characters in the case are given below:

Person MS: The patient

Nurse D

To discuss:

On what should Person X base the judgment.

Answer 20

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 21

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 22

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 23

Ch. 2 - Prob. 1RP Ch. 2 - Prob. 2RP Ch. 2 - Prob. 3RP Ch. 2 - Prob. 4RP Ch. 2 - Prob. 5RP Ch. 2 - Prob. 1DCR Ch. 2 - Prob. 2DCR Ch. 2 - Prob. 1PFN Ch. 2 - Prob. 2PFN Ch. 2 - Prob. 3PFN

Concept explainers

Videos

Want to see the full answer?

Chapter 2 Solutions