South-western Federal Taxation 2018: Individual Income Taxes
41st Edition
ISBN: 9781337385886
Author: William H. Hoffman, James C. Young, William A. Raabe, David M. Maloney, Annette Nellen
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 2, Problem 27DQ
To determine
Identify the court that issued the decisions based on the given citations.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
for each of following citations, identify the type of authority (Statutory, administrative, or judicial) and explain the citation.
1.111-1
IRC 469 (c)(7)(B)(i)
Rul 82-204, 1982-2 C.B. 192
Amdahl Corp., 108 TC 507 (1997)
PLR 9727004
Hills v. Comm’r, 50 AFTR2d 82-6070 (11th, 1982)
A Memorandum decision of the U.S. Tax Court could be cited as:
Oa. 68-1 USTC 1 9200.
Ob. T.C. Memo. 1990-650.
Oc. 37 AFTR 2d 456.
Od. All of these choices are correct.
Prepare a case brief-a concise summary of relevant on two cases: Harold Dancer, 73 T.C. 1103 (1980) and Freedman v. Comm., 62 - 1 USTC 9400
Chapter 2 Solutions
South-western Federal Taxation 2018: Individual Income Taxes
Ch. 2 - Prob. 1DQCh. 2 - Why do taxpayers often have more than one...Ch. 2 - Prob. 3DQCh. 2 - Prob. 4DQCh. 2 - Prob. 5DQCh. 2 - Prob. 6DQCh. 2 - Rank the following items from the lowest to...Ch. 2 - Prob. 8DQCh. 2 - Prob. 9DQCh. 2 - Prob. 10DQ
Ch. 2 - Prob. 11DQCh. 2 - Prob. 12DQCh. 2 - Prob. 13DQCh. 2 - Prob. 14DQCh. 2 - Prob. 15DQCh. 2 - Prob. 16DQCh. 2 - Prob. 17DQCh. 2 - Prob. 18DQCh. 2 - Prob. 19DQCh. 2 - Prob. 20DQCh. 2 - Prob. 21DQCh. 2 - Prob. 22DQCh. 2 - Prob. 23DQCh. 2 - Prob. 24DQCh. 2 - Prob. 25DQCh. 2 - Prob. 26DQCh. 2 - Prob. 27DQCh. 2 - Prob. 28DQCh. 2 - Prob. 29DQCh. 2 - Prob. 30DQCh. 2 - Prob. 31DQCh. 2 - For her tax class, Yvonne must prepare a research...Ch. 2 - Prob. 33DQCh. 2 - Prob. 34DQCh. 2 - Prob. 35DQCh. 2 - Prob. 36DQCh. 2 - Prob. 37PCh. 2 - Prob. 38PCh. 2 - Prob. 39PCh. 2 - Prob. 40PCh. 2 - Prob. 41PCh. 2 - Using the legend provided, classify each of the...Ch. 2 - Prob. 43PCh. 2 - Prob. 1RPCh. 2 - Prob. 2RPCh. 2 - When Oprah gave away Pontiac G6 sedans to her TV...Ch. 2 - Prob. 4RPCh. 2 - (1) Go to taxalmanac.org, and use the website to...
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Finding Regulations. All of the regulations relating to §280A (concerning the home office deduction) are A.Temporary B. Final C. Proposed D. There are no regulations for Section 280Aarrow_forward2.Which of the following are courts of original jurisdiction? a.U.S. Tax Court b.U.S. District Court c.U.S. Court of Federal Claims d.All of the above e.None of the abovearrow_forwardClassify the following citation as to the location. A citation may have more than one answer. Location IRC = Internal Revenue Code IRB = Internal Revenue Bulletin CB = Cumulative Bulletin FR = Federal Register NA = Not applicable Citation § 61(a)(13). Prop.Reg. § 1.368–2(b)(1). Rev.Proc. 77–37, 1977–2 C.B. 568. Temp.Reg. § 1.163–9T(b)(2)(I)(A). Rev.Rul. 64–56, 1964–1 C.B. 133. Jack E. Golsen, 54 T.C. 742 (1970). Ltr.Rul. 9802018arrow_forward
- The following is an example of a Citator which provides details of how later cases or rulings have dealt with a case of interest in their decisions: a. CCH Citator b. Shepard's Citator c. The Federal Reporter d. all of the above.arrow_forwardI. In case of conflict between revenue regulation and the provisions of NIRC, the former shall prevail. II. NIRC is a special law, thus in case of conflict with civil code, then the latter shall prevail. o Both are true o Both are false o Only I is true o Only II is truearrow_forwardQ. Explain the difference between a regular decision by the Tax Court and a memorandum decision by this court. Q. Many Tax Court decisions end with the phrase, ``Decision will be entered under Rule 155.'' What does this mean? Q. Find the court decision Stuart Hirshfield v. U.S. (88 AFTR 2d 2001-7095). Use the Citator to evaluate the reliability of this court decision. Include a print out of your results. Explain how you located this information. Q. You are reviewing a client's file and notice that a previous tax return position was taken based on a reveune ruling. You want to examine the current status of the revenune to see if there have been any changes that will affect the client's position. Provide the cite for the following Revenue Ruling and note its current status. Q. A partner at your firm has called you into his office for some help with a client issue. The client has a transaction that involes S. 162. The partner would like you to determine if any revenue rulings has been…arrow_forward
- For a cash basis taxpayer, income that has not actually been received by the taxpayer is taxed as though it had been received, thus income is considered constructively received when (mark apply that apply): A. The constructive receipt doctrine does not apply to income the taxpayer is not yet entitled to receive. B. The purpose of the constructive receipt doctrine is to prevent a cash basis taxpayer from deferring the recognition of income that, although not yet received, has been made practically available to the taxpayer. OC. The taxpayer's actual receipt is not subject to substantial limitations or restrictions. D. The amount is made readily available to the taxpayer. E. None of these are true.arrow_forwardWhich U.S. court's summary opinion may not be treated as precedent for another case? U.S. Tax Court's Small Claims Division U.S. District Court's Small Claims Division U.S. Court of Appeals Small Claims Division O U.S. Court of Federal Claims Small Claims Divisionarrow_forwardSelect the appropriate case to which each is most closely related. Concluded that auditors could be liable to third parties who were not in privity with them. Multiple Choice Credit Alliance v. Arthur Andersen. Ultramares Corp, v. Touche. Smith v. London Assurance Corp. State Street Trust v. Ernst.arrow_forward
- Statement 1: BIR rulings are the final interpretations of the Tax Code. Statement 2: Supreme Court decision shall prevail over the BIR rulings. a. Only statement 1 is correct c. Both statements are correct b. Only statement 2 is correct d. Both statements are not correctarrow_forward45arrow_forwardA court order requiring that a person do or refrain from doing a particular act is known as a(n): a. injunction. b. statute. c. maxim. d. executive order.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Individual Income TaxesAccountingISBN:9780357109731Author:HoffmanPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
Individual Income Taxes
Accounting
ISBN:9780357109731
Author:Hoffman
Publisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT