Microeconomics (6th Edition)
6th Edition
ISBN: 9780134106243
Author: R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O'Brien
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 2, Problem 2.2.4PA
Subpart (a):
To determine
US and Canada
Subpart (b):
To determine
Subpart (c):
To determine
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Suppose that France and Germany both produce wine and cheese. The table below shows combinations of the goods that each country can produce in a day.
Part 2
France
Germany
Wine (Bottles)
Cheese (Pounds)
Wine (Bottles)
Cheese (Pounds)
0
8
0
25
1
6
1
20
2
4
2
15
3
2
3
10
4
0
4
5
5
0
Part 3
Who has the comparative advantage in producing wine and who has the comparative advantage in producing cheese?
Part 4
A.
Neither has a comparative advantage producing wine or cheese.
B.
France has a comparative advantage producing wine and Germany has a comparative advantage producing cheese.
C.
France has a comparative advantage producing cheese and Germany has a comparative advantage producing wine.
D.
France has a comparative advantage producing wine and cheese.
E.
Germany has a comparative advantage producing wine and cheese.
Part 5
Suppose that France is…
England and Scotland both produce scones and sweaters. Suppose that an English worker can produce 50 scones per hour or 1 sweater per hour. Suppose that a Scottish worker can produce 40 scones per hour or 2 sweaters per hour.
Which country has the absolute advantage in the production of each good? Which country has the comparative advantage?
If England and Scotland decide to trade, which commodity will Scotland export to England? Explain.
If a Scottish worker could produce only 1 sweater per hour, would Scotland still gain from trade? Would England still gain from trade? Explain.
Suppose that a tailor in Cottonland can sew either 40 cotton shirts or 10 silk shirts per week, and a tailor in Silkland can sew either 18 cotton shirts or 6 silk shirts per week. There are 20 tailors in Cottonland and 20 tailors is Silkland. Answer the following questions:
2.1. What country has the absolute advantage in sewing cotton shirts? What country has the absolute advantage in sewing silk shirts?
2.2. What country has the comparative advantage in sewing cotton shirts? What country has the comparative advantage in sewing silk shirts? Numerically
2.3. If the two countries specialize and produce according to the comparative advantage criterion, how much in terms of cotton and silk shirts each country will produce per week? Fill in the table below with your calculations.
Cotton shirts/per week
Silk shirts/per week
Cottonland
Silkland
Chapter 2 Solutions
Microeconomics (6th Edition)
Ch. 2 - Prob. 1TCCh. 2 - Prob. 2TCCh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.1RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.2RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.3RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.4PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.5PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.6PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.7PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.8PA
Ch. 2 - Prob. 2.1.9PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.10PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.11PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.12PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.13PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.1.14PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.1RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.2RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.3PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.4PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.5PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.6PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.7PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.8PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.9PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.10PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.11PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.12PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.13PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.14PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.2.15PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.1RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.2RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.3RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.4RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.5RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.6RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.7PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.8PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.9PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.10PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.11PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.12PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.13PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.14PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.15PACh. 2 - Prob. 2.3.16PA
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Comparative advantage is an important concept to explain how economies work. Because of comparative advantage, it is possible for people to use their skills and time productively even if they are not the best at something. To help illustrate the usefulness of this concept: Think of an example (work, family chores, school projects, etc.) where you might not have an absolute advantage at something, but you do have a comparative advantage. By this, I mean that you might not be the fastest or the best at a particular job. Other employees, family members, etc. may do the job quicker or better than you could. But their opportunity cost was high, meaning they had something more necessary for them to do, so it made sense for you to do this job. Explain how this was an example of you having a comparative advantage but not an absolute advantage. Did you (and the others in your example) specialize according to comparative advantage? What job(s) did you do? What did other people do? Did this…arrow_forwardSuppose the United States and Mexico both produce hamburgers and tacos. The combinations of the two goods that each country can produce in one day are presented in the table below. United States Mexico Hamburgers (in tons) Tacos (in tons) Hamburgers (in tons) Tacos (in tons) 90 75 50 60 10 50 100 30 20 25 150 30 Which country has an absolute advantage in producing tacos? The United States Which country has a comparative advantage in producing tacos? Mexico Suppose the United States is currently producing 100 tons of hamburgers and 30 tons of tacos and Mexico is currently producing 20 tons of hamburgers and 25 tons of tacos. If the United States and Mexico each specialize in producing only one good (the good for which each has a comparative advantage), then a total of additional ton(s) of hamburgers can be produced for the two countries combined (enter a numeric response using an integer)arrow_forwardSuppose that Bob and Jimmy both have 10 hours of time that they can use to do one of two things: make pasta or make hamburgers. Bob can make 15 hamburgers in one hour and 3 plates of pasta in one hour. Jimmy can make 8 hamburgers in one hour and 2 plates of pasta in one hour. Who has comparative in the production of hamburgers? Who has comparative advantage in the production of pasta? If Bob and Jimmy trade, who should specialize in producing hamburgers and who should specialize in producing pancakes? Give an example of terms of trade at which mutually beneficial trade would be possible between Bob and Jimmy.arrow_forward
- Debra can make either 12 cakes or 16 cookies in 4 hours.Sam can make either 6 cakes or 12 cookies in 4 hours. a) who has an absolute advantage at producing cakes and who has an absolute advantage at producing cookies? Briefly explain your answer. b) if Debra and Sam concentrate on producing only the product in which they have a comparative advantage, how many cakes and how many cookies will they produce? c) state debra's and Sam's opportunity costs of producing one cake and one cookie. Draw and place your answer in a table which looks something like this: Cake. Cookie Debra samarrow_forwardState what the theory of comparative advantage forecasts: When there are two countries A and B, and two goods are produced by them: good X and Y. a) Trade between A and B will only take place if both countries are at a comparatively similar stage in the development of their economies. b) Trade can take place even if country A has an absolute advantage in both providing that B chooses to specialize in the good in which it has the least comparative disadvantage, and A specializes in the one in which it has the greater comparative advantage. c) Trade can only take place if country A has an absolute advantage in producing one of the goods, and country B has an absolute advantage in producing the other. d) None of the above.arrow_forwardSuppose the United States and Mexico both produce hamburgers and tacos. The combinations of the two goods that each country can produce in one day are presented in the table below. United States Hamburgers (in tons) Mexico Tacos (in tons) Hamburgers (in tons) Tacos (in tons) 27 15 10 20 18 9 10 30 Which country has an absolute advantage in producing tacos? The United States. Which country has a comparative advantage in producing tacos? Mexico Suppose the United States is currently producing 20 tons of hamburgers and 9 tons of tacos and Mexico is currently producing 4 tons of hamburgers and 5 tons of tacos. If the United States and Mexico each specialize in producing only one good (the good for which each has a comparative advantage), then a total of additional ton(s) of hamburgers can be produced for the two countries combined (enter a numeric response using an integer)arrow_forward
- Suppose the United States and Mexico both produce hamburgers and tacos. The combinations of the two goods that each country can produce in one day are presented in the table below United States Mexico Tacos (in tons) 180 120 60 Hamburgers (in tons) Tacos (in tons) 150 100 50 Hamburgers (in tons) 100 200 10 20 30 300 Which country has an abrolute advantage in producing tacos? The United States Which country has a comparative advantage in producing tacos? Mexico Suppose the United States is currently producing 200 tons of hamburgers and 60 tons of tacos and Mexico is currently producing 20 tons of hamburgers and 50 tons of tacos. If the United States and Mexico each specialize in producing only one good (the good for which each has a comparative advantage), then a total of additional ton(s) of hamburgers can be produced for the two countries combined (enter a numenc response using an integear) I don't understand the bottom part I got it wrong twice. After I click next there is also…arrow_forwardRobin and Betty can each pick mangoes and oranges. The following table summarises the time it takes each to perform each task. Time to pick 1kg of mangoes Time to pick 1kg of oranges Robin 40 minutes 10 minutes Betty 30 minutes 20 minutes Based on this information, has a comparative advantage in picking and an absolute advantage in picking (Need help? Read chapter 1.3 of the textbook, here: https://playconomics.com/textbooks/view/playconomics4-2019t3/part1/ch1/s3) Robin; oranges; oranges Robin; mangoes; oranges Betty; mangoes; oranges None of these. Betty; oranges; mangoesarrow_forwardThe United States and Taiwan both produce beef and semiconductor chips, as per the PPC provided below. United States A с Quantity of semiconductor chips Quantity of beef Taiwan Quantity of semiconductor chips Quantity of beef 0 175 W 0 80 B 5 140 X 25 60 15 70 Y 75 20 D 25 0 N 100 0arrow_forward
- Suppose that Portugal and Switzerland both produce jeans and stained glass. Portugal's opportunity cost of producing a pane of stained glass is 4 pairs of jeans while Switzerland's opportunity cost of producing a pane of stained glass is 10 pairs of jeans. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing stained glass in the two countries, you can tell that the production of stained glass and has a comparative advantage in the production of jeans. Suppose that Portugal and Switzerland consider trading stained glass and jeans with each other. Portugal can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than of jeans for each pane of stained glass it exports to Switzerland. Similarly, Switzerland can gain from of stained glass for each pair of jeans it exports to Portugal. trade as long as it receives more than Based on your answer to the last question, which of the following prices of trade (that is, price of stained glass in terms of jeans) would allow both Switzerland and…arrow_forwardSuppose that Spain and Greece both produce wine and olive oil. The following table shows combinations of the goods that each country can produce in a week (in thousands of liters). Spain Greece Wine Olive Oil Wine Olive Oil 0 16 0 30 1 12 1 24 2 8 2 18 3 4 3 12 4 0 4 6 -- -- 5 0 a. Who has a comparative advantage in producing wine? Who has a comparative advantage in producing olive oil? Explain b. Suppose that Spain is currently producing 1000 liters of wine and 12000 liters of olive oil per week and Greece is currently producing 3000 liters of wine and 12000 liters of olive oil per week. Demonstrate that Spain and Greece can both be better off if they specialise in producing only one good and then engage in trade.arrow_forwardDavid Ricardo, the British political economist, used the example of two commodities—wine and cloth—produced by England and Portugal to explain trade. The following table shows the number of labor hours it would take England and Portugal to produce one unit each of wine and cloth: (see table attatched) Portugal can produce both wine and cloth using fewer labor hours than England uses. A group of mercantilists (who believe that nations build their wealth by exporting more than they import) suggest that Portugal has nothing to gain from trading with England. Would you agree? Explain your answer.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student EditionEconomicsISBN:9780078747663Author:McGraw-HillPublisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student Edition
Economics
ISBN:9780078747663
Author:McGraw-Hill
Publisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co