
The continental drift hypothesis by Wegener and the controversies of other geologists on his theory.

Answer to Problem 1RQ
Wegener gave all the possible evidences which prove that the continents were once together as Pangaea and drifted apart during the late Mesozoic period. But he couldn’t formulate a reason for such a drift. Also, he didn’t explain the massive force that makes such huge blocks to drift apart. Hence, at first, other geologists couldn’t accept his proposal.
Explanation of Solution
Alfred Wegener is a German geologist who formulated the idea of the continental drift theory.
Wegener hypothesized that all continents present now were once making up a large super continent together, called Pangea, surrounded by a vast ocean. Later, due to some natural forces, they were broken and drifted apart at the end of the Mesozoic period. He formulated some evidences for his theory.
Evidences:
He observed the match of edges of continents. Wegener observed the match of the Atlantic coast lines, that is, the Eastern coast of North America and the North-western coast of Africa. Also, he pointed out the bulge of Eastern South America into South-western Africa. Australia, Antarctica, and India could all connect to the southeast of Africa, while Greenland, Europe, and Asia could pack against the northeastern margin of North America.
Wegener found that the same distinctive Precambrian rock assemblages occurred on the eastern coast of South America and the western coast of Africa; regions now separated by an ocean. He also noticed that some of the features of the Appalachian Mountains of the United States and Canada closely match mountain belts in southern Greenland, Great Britain, Scandinavia, and Northwestern Africa. Therefore, he stated that not only coast lines but also rock units have matched.
Land dwelling animals cannot swim across oceans. Thus, Wegener observed the fossil record of late Paleozoic and Mesozoic time and fortunately, he observed that the same species existed on several continents which he placed adjacent to each other. He also observed the Paleozoic coal, reef, sand-dune, and salt deposits which define the climatic belts on Pangaea and that even matched his theory.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- due today at 2pm, the problems have been done already, is there anyway you can draw the diagrams i was supposed to for each problem because I am confused on how to draw themarrow_forwarddue today at 2pm, the problem have been done already, is there anyway you can draw the diagrams i was supposed to for this because I am confused on how to draw themarrow_forwardTHIS IS DUE AT 2PM TODAY, I JUST NEED HELP WITH THE DRAWINGS THATS IT CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP MEarrow_forward
- C) A thermometer D A seismometer 23 A student conducted an investigation to determine the effect of water temperature on the amount of sugar that dissolves in a beaker of water. Identify components for trial 1 of this investigation. DRAG & DROP THE ANSWER Note: Use CTRL+D to drag the option via keyboard Constant DV IV Trial 1 Beaker Number Amount of Temperature of Temperature of Amount of Suga Water (mL) Sugar (°C) Water (°C) Dissolved (g) 1 100 20 5 185 2 100 20 10 189 20 15 194 204arrow_forwarddue today at 2pm, the problem have been done already, is there anyway you can draw the diagrams i was supposed to for this because I am confused on how to draw themarrow_forward1. Calculate the elevation of the water table at each well location and write the approximate elevation on the line next to each well. Next, use a colored pencil to draw smooth 10-foot contours that show the shape of the water table. (Start with the 1160-foot contour.) Use a pencil of a different color to draw arrows on the map to indicate the direction of the slope of the water table. a. Toward which direction (downward) does the water table slope? b. Referring to the site of the proposed water well, at approximately what depth below the surface should the proposed well intersect the water table? 2. Assume that a dye was put into well A on May 10, 2017, and detected in well B on May 25, 2018. What was the rate of groundwater movement between the two wells, in centimeters per day? (Hint: Convert feet to centimeters.)Velocity:_____________centimeters per dayarrow_forward
- PART 1 Activity 8.7 Ground Subsidence (Figure 8.7) 1. What is the general relationship between ground subsidence and the level of water in the well? 2. What was the total ground subsidence, and what was the total drop in the level of water in the well during the period shown on the graph?Total ground subsidence: —--feetTotal drop in well level: —-- feet 3. During the period shown on the graph, on aver-age, about how much land subsidence occurred with each 20-foot decrease in the water level in the well: 1 foot, 5 feet, or 10 feet?Subsidence: about—----foot/feet 4. Was the ground subsidence that occurred between 1930 and 1950 less or more than the subsidence that occurred between 1950 and 1970?Ground subsidence from 1930 to 1950 was—----than that from 1950 to 1970. 5. Notice that minimal subsidence occurred from 1935 to 1950. Refer to the well water level during the same period of time and suggest a possible reason for the reduced rate of subsidence. PART 2 Activity 8.8 Examining a…arrow_forwardPART 1 Activity 8.7 Ground Subsidence (Figure 8.7) 1. What is the general relationship between ground subsidence and the level of water in the well? 2. What was the total ground subsidence, and what was the total drop in the level of water in the well during the period shown on the graph?Total ground subsidence: —--feetTotal drop in well level: —-- feet 3. During the period shown on the graph, on aver-age, about how much land subsidence occurred with each 20-foot decrease in the water level in the well: 1 foot, 5 feet, or 10 feet?Subsidence: about—----foot/feet 4. Was the ground subsidence that occurred between 1930 and 1950 less or more than the subsidence that occurred between 1950 and 1970?Ground subsidence from 1930 to 1950 was—----than that from 1950 to 1970. 5. Notice that minimal subsidence occurred from 1935 to 1950. Refer to the well water level during the same period of time and suggest a possible reason for the reduced rate of subsidence. PART 2 Activity 8.8 Examining a…arrow_forwardN (120') -1180- (120') (105') 0 50 100 feet 1160- -1140- A (100') B (90') (80) Proposed well -1120. (95) (80°) (80') 1100 Well location (Depth to top of water table) A Figure 8.14 Hypothetical topographic map showing the locations of several water wells. The numbers in parentheses indicate the depth of the water table below the surface in each well.arrow_forward
- Applications and Investigations in Earth Science ...Earth ScienceISBN:9780134746241Author:Edward J. Tarbuck, Frederick K. Lutgens, Dennis G. TasaPublisher:PEARSONExercises for Weather & Climate (9th Edition)Earth ScienceISBN:9780134041360Author:Greg CarbonePublisher:PEARSONEnvironmental ScienceEarth ScienceISBN:9781260153125Author:William P Cunningham Prof., Mary Ann Cunningham ProfessorPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
- Earth Science (15th Edition)Earth ScienceISBN:9780134543536Author:Edward J. Tarbuck, Frederick K. Lutgens, Dennis G. TasaPublisher:PEARSONEnvironmental Science (MindTap Course List)Earth ScienceISBN:9781337569613Author:G. Tyler Miller, Scott SpoolmanPublisher:Cengage LearningPhysical GeologyEarth ScienceISBN:9781259916823Author:Plummer, Charles C., CARLSON, Diane H., Hammersley, LisaPublisher:Mcgraw-hill Education,





