
Concept explainers
Subpart (a):
The best production technique.
Subpart (a):

Explanation of Solution
The production technique is the allotment and arrangement of the economic resources as well as the other goods and services, into the production of the consumer goods and services which optimizes the cost and allocates the resources in an efficient manner. In this case, each of the production technique produces 5 units of output and thus each are equally productive. When the cost structure is analyzed, the technique 2 is the least cost combination ($13 compared to the $15 each under the technique 1 and technique 3). The technique 2 produces the output (5 units) similar to other two techniques and at a least cost of production ($13).
When the
Thus, when the price decreases from $3 to $2.75, the revenue of the firm reduces to $13.75 from $15 but not the cost. Thus, the firm will continue to use the least cost combination of production, which is the technique 2 which provides the minimum profit to the firm with a low cost.
When there is an increase in price to $4 from $3, the revenue of the firm increases, but it does not affect the cost of the production. Thus, the firm will continue its production at the least cost combination and make use of the higher prices to increase the profit margin of the firm. Since, the technique 2 remains as the least cost combination production technique, the firm will continue its production using technique 2.
Similarly, when the price increases further to $5, the least cost production will help the business owners to maximize their profit margin which will lead to use the technique 2 for the production.
Concept introduction:
Production technique: The production technique can be considered as the arrangement of the factors of production and the resources involved into the production of the consumer goods in such a way that it minimizes the cost of production and maximizes the profit maintaining a better work flow.
Subpart (b):
The number of bar soaps produced at $2 price.
Subpart (b):

Explanation of Solution
The total cost of production in the least cost combination of production is $13 which is under the technique 2. When the price falls from $3 to $2, the total revenue of the firm can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the total revenue of the firm is lower than the total cost incurred by the firm in production. When the total revenue is lower than the cost of production, then, the firm will face the loss and thus, it is not profitable to carry on the production using any of the techniques at the price level of $2 per soap bar.
Concept introduction:
Profitability of production: The profitability of production takes place when the total revenue is greater than the total cost of the production. The difference between the total revenue and the total cost in this situation is known as profit. When the total cost is higher than the total revenue, then the difference between the total cost and the total revenue is known as loss.
Subpart (c):
The Least profitable combination of production at price of $1 for each input.
Subpart (c):

Explanation of Solution
When the cost of production changes with per unit change in the price of the inputs, it will lead to the profitability of each production technology to change. When the price of each unit of factor declines to $1, we can calculate the total cost of production under each production technique as follows:
Resources |
Price per unit of Resource | ||||||
Technique 1 | Technique 2 | Technique 3 | |||||
Units | Cost | Units | Cost | Units | Cost | ||
Labor | $1 | 4 | $4 | 2 | $2 | 1 | $1 |
Land | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
Capital | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Entrepreneurial ability | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Total cost of $15 worth bar soap | $7 | $7 | $8 |
From the table above, it can be easily identified that the technique which incurs high cost of production will be the least profitable combination. Here, technique 3 incurs a high price of production when each factor has a price of $1 in the economy.
Concept Introduction:
Profitability of production: The profitability of production takes place when the total revenue is greater than the total cost of the production. The difference between the total revenue and the total cost in this situation is known as profit. When the total cost is higher than the total revenue, then the difference between the total cost and the total revenue is known as loss.
Subpart (d):
The Least profitable combination of production at price of $1 for each input.
Subpart (d):

Explanation of Solution
When the new production method which gives 3 units of output is introduced at the normal level prices of the factors of production which uses one unit of each factors of production, the cost and revenue of using the new production technique can be calculated as follows:
The cost of production technique can be calculated as follows:
Resource |
Price per unit of resource |
Technique 4 | |
Unit |
cost | ||
Labor | $2 | 1 | $2 |
Land | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Capital | 3 | 1 | 3 |
Entrepreneurial ability | 3 | 1 | 3 |
Total cost of $15 worth bar soap | $9 |
Thus, from the above calculations, we can easily summarize that the new production technique involves the total cost of $9 and the total revenue of $9. . Thus, there is no economic profit for the firm to carry on its production using the technique 4. But the use of the technique 2 provides the firm with economic profit and thus, the firm will continue its production using the technique 2.
Concept Introduction:
Profitability of production: The profitability of production takes place when the total revenue is greater than the total cost of the production. The difference between the total revenue and the total cost in this situation is known as profit. When the total cost is higher than the total revenue, then the difference between the total cost and the total revenue is known as loss.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 2 Solutions
EBK ECONOMICS
- PART II: Multipart Problems wood or solem of triflussd aidi 1. Assume that a society has a polluting industry comprising two firms, where the industry-level marginal abatement cost curve is given by: MAC = 24 - ()E and the marginal damage function is given by: MDF = 2E. What is the efficient level of emissions? b. What constant per-unit emissions tax could achieve the efficient emissions level? points) c. What is the net benefit to society of moving from the unregulated emissions level to the efficient level? In response to industry complaints about the costs of the tax, a cap-and-trade program is proposed. The marginal abatement cost curves for the two firms are given by: MAC=24-E and MAC2 = 24-2E2. d. How could a cap-and-trade program that achieves the same level of emissions as the tax be designed to reduce the costs of regulation to the two firms?arrow_forwardOnly #4 please, Use a graph please if needed to help provearrow_forwarda-carrow_forward
- For these questions, you must state "true," "false," or "uncertain" and argue your case (roughly 3 to 5 sentences). When appropriate, the use of graphs will make for stronger answers. Credit will depend entirely on the quality of your explanation. 1. If the industry facing regulation for its pollutant emissions has a lot of political capital, direct regulatory intervention will be more viable than an emissions tax to address this market failure. 2. A stated-preference method will provide a measure of the value of Komodo dragons that is more accurate than the value estimated through application of the travel cost model to visitation data for Komodo National Park in Indonesia. 3. A correlation between community demographics and the present location of polluting facilities is sufficient to claim a violation of distributive justice. olsvrc Q 4. When the damages from pollution are uncertain, a price-based mechanism is best equipped to manage the costs of the regulator's imperfect…arrow_forwardFor environmental economics, question number 2 only please-- thank you!arrow_forwardFor these questions, you must state "true," "false," or "uncertain" and argue your case (roughly 3 to 5 sentences). When appropriate, the use of graphs will make for stronger answers. Credit will depend entirely on the quality of your explanation. 1. If the industry facing regulation for its pollutant emissions has a lot of political capital, direct regulatory intervention will be more viable than an emissions tax to address this market failure. cullog iba linevoz ve bubivorearrow_forward
- Exercise 3 The production function of a firm is described by the following equation Q=10,000-3L2 where L stands for the units of labour. a) Draw a graph for this equation. Use the quantity produced in the y-axis, and the units of labour in the x-axis. b) What is the maximum production level? c) How many units of labour are needed at that point? d) Provide one reference with you answer.arrow_forwardExercise 1 Consider the market supply curve which passes through the intercept and from which the market equilibrium data is known, this is, the price and quantity of equilibrium PE=50 and QE=2000. Considering those two points, find the equation of the supply. Draw a graph of this line. Provide one reference with your answer. Exercise 2 Considering the previous supply line, determine if the following demand function corresponds to the market demand equilibrium stated above. QD=3000-2p.arrow_forwardConsider the market supply curve which passes through the intercept and from which the marketequilibrium data is known, this is, the price and quantity of equilibrium PE=50 and QE=2000.a. Considering those two points, find the equation of the supply. b. Draw a graph of this line.arrow_forward
- Principles of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning




