When the candidates promise the moon in pre-election time, what fundamental economic logic is swept under the brush and not mentioned by the candidates?

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 2, Problem 1E

To determine

When the candidates promise the moon in pre-election time, what fundamental economic logic is swept under the brush and not mentioned by the candidates?

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1E

The economic concept, 1) only that much of demand can be met for which resources are available and 2) normally resources are scarce, is ignored by the candidates when making pre-poll promises.

Explanation of Solution

Let us take the example of the fine business person that American President, Mr. Donald trump is. Before elections, Trump had promised to revive the business competitiveness. For this, he proposed corporate tax cut from substantial 35% to 21%. He went by his words and reduced the tax rate in his first term. Now let us see the likely results. Tax cuts mean greater profit for the companies. That is fine for the corporates. However, what is in store for the economy?

Tax cuts mean lower supply of disposable funds for the government. This translates to slackening of the economy owing to lesser spending by the government on essential nation building activities like infrastructure, social responsibilities, healthcare, military etc.

Again, when some pre-poll candidate is vowing to increase budget of healthcare, because the supply of money is limited, either that may lead to less expenditure in fields like infrastructure or increasing money supply by levying excess tax from companies or the common people. Demand (of voters) that can be met is a function of the available resources. Scarce supply cannot lead to greater supply of any commodity.

It is not that candidates do not understand the implication of the sky-high promises they make, if they were to execute them. However, the voters also play a part in these untenable statements by falling for it and electing that candidate.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

Anything in the economy is based on supply and demand. Abundant availability on the supply side is required to produce adequate goods. However, the candidates only seem to appease the demand of the voters in pre-election rallies. Whether the supply side is abundant enough to cater to that demand or the resource is actually scarce, is a point left for the to-be-formed government to tackle after the elections.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Response to J.C. Ethics Statement Raising our products' global profile requires a firm commitment to doing the right thing by society and the environment. By switching to a more energy-efficient cloud architecture, BillRight Software, Inc. will reduce its carbon footprint while also ensuring the absolute security of all customer data. Fair labor standards, a diverse and inclusive workforce, and giving back to the communities where our employees live and work are some of our core values. Following local regulations, accepting cultural variances, and actively participating in community development projects are all ways our brand and product will uphold our ethical values globally (Corcoran, 2024; Kotler et al., 2023; Kotler & Keller, 2024; Solomon & Russell, 2024). How MKTG 525 Gets You Together with Classmates? Different points of view in dealing with classmates from many backgrounds exposes you to many points of view, ideas, and techniques. This variety enriches the learning…

3. Case 2) Coal plants exit, and Solar generation enters the market Now, let's consider a scenario where the coal power plant (#1) shuts down and exits the market, and a solar generation facility is constructed. The capacity of the solar generation facility is the same as the coal power plant that went out of business. The generation capacities of this market are shown below, along with their MC. Table 3: Power Plant Capacity and Marginal Cost: Case 2 Plant # Energy Source Capacity (MW) MC (S/MWh) 2 Oil 100 90 3 Natural Gas 500 50 4 Nuclear 600 0 5 Solar 300 5 Note that the solar plant (#5) can generate electricity only from 7 AM until 5PM. During these hours, the plant can generate up to its full capacity (300 MW) but cannot generate any when unavailable. (a) Draw a supply curve for each hourly market (4AM, 10 AM, 2PM, 6PM). (b) Find the market clearing prices and calculate how much electricity each power plant generates in the hourly market (4AM, 10AM, 2PM, and 6PM). (c) Find the…

Respond to L.R. To analyze consumer spending, you must review the macroeconomic indicators of Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) and Retail Sales over the past year. Selected Macroeconomic indicators Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) measure the value of household goods and services consumed and are a key indicator of consumer spending. - Retail Sales: This tracks the total receipts of retail stores and provides insight into consumer demand and spending trends. - Patterns over the past year: Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Over the past year, PCE has steadily increased, reflecting consumer confidence and willingness to spend. The growth rate has been moderate, driven by wage growth, low unemployment rates, and government stimulus measures. However, inflationary pressures have also impacted real purchasing power, leading to a mixed outlook. - Retail sales have also experienced fluctuations but have generally trended upwards. After a…

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 2, Problem 1E

To determine

When the candidates promise the moon in pre-election time, what fundamental economic logic is swept under the brush and not mentioned by the candidates?

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1E

The economic concept, 1) only that much of demand can be met for which resources are available and 2) normally resources are scarce, is ignored by the candidates when making pre-poll promises.

Explanation of Solution

Let us take the example of the fine business person that American President, Mr. Donald trump is. Before elections, Trump had promised to revive the business competitiveness. For this, he proposed corporate tax cut from substantial 35% to 21%. He went by his words and reduced the tax rate in his first term. Now let us see the likely results. Tax cuts mean greater profit for the companies. That is fine for the corporates. However, what is in store for the economy?

Tax cuts mean lower supply of disposable funds for the government. This translates to slackening of the economy owing to lesser spending by the government on essential nation building activities like infrastructure, social responsibilities, healthcare, military etc.

Again, when some pre-poll candidate is vowing to increase budget of healthcare, because the supply of money is limited, either that may lead to less expenditure in fields like infrastructure or increasing money supply by levying excess tax from companies or the common people. Demand (of voters) that can be met is a function of the available resources. Scarce supply cannot lead to greater supply of any commodity.

It is not that candidates do not understand the implication of the sky-high promises they make, if they were to execute them. However, the voters also play a part in these untenable statements by falling for it and electing that candidate.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

Anything in the economy is based on supply and demand. Abundant availability on the supply side is required to produce adequate goods. However, the candidates only seem to appease the demand of the voters in pre-election rallies. Whether the supply side is abundant enough to cater to that demand or the resource is actually scarce, is a point left for the to-be-formed government to tackle after the elections.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 2, Problem 1E

To determine

When the candidates promise the moon in pre-election time, what fundamental economic logic is swept under the brush and not mentioned by the candidates?

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1E

The economic concept, 1) only that much of demand can be met for which resources are available and 2) normally resources are scarce, is ignored by the candidates when making pre-poll promises.

Explanation of Solution

Let us take the example of the fine business person that American President, Mr. Donald trump is. Before elections, Trump had promised to revive the business competitiveness. For this, he proposed corporate tax cut from substantial 35% to 21%. He went by his words and reduced the tax rate in his first term. Now let us see the likely results. Tax cuts mean greater profit for the companies. That is fine for the corporates. However, what is in store for the economy?

Tax cuts mean lower supply of disposable funds for the government. This translates to slackening of the economy owing to lesser spending by the government on essential nation building activities like infrastructure, social responsibilities, healthcare, military etc.

Again, when some pre-poll candidate is vowing to increase budget of healthcare, because the supply of money is limited, either that may lead to less expenditure in fields like infrastructure or increasing money supply by levying excess tax from companies or the common people. Demand (of voters) that can be met is a function of the available resources. Scarce supply cannot lead to greater supply of any commodity.

It is not that candidates do not understand the implication of the sky-high promises they make, if they were to execute them. However, the voters also play a part in these untenable statements by falling for it and electing that candidate.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

Anything in the economy is based on supply and demand. Abundant availability on the supply side is required to produce adequate goods. However, the candidates only seem to appease the demand of the voters in pre-election rallies. Whether the supply side is abundant enough to cater to that demand or the resource is actually scarce, is a point left for the to-be-formed government to tackle after the elections.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 2, Problem 1E

To determine

When the candidates promise the moon in pre-election time, what fundamental economic logic is swept under the brush and not mentioned by the candidates?

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1E

The economic concept, 1) only that much of demand can be met for which resources are available and 2) normally resources are scarce, is ignored by the candidates when making pre-poll promises.

Explanation of Solution

Let us take the example of the fine business person that American President, Mr. Donald trump is. Before elections, Trump had promised to revive the business competitiveness. For this, he proposed corporate tax cut from substantial 35% to 21%. He went by his words and reduced the tax rate in his first term. Now let us see the likely results. Tax cuts mean greater profit for the companies. That is fine for the corporates. However, what is in store for the economy?

Tax cuts mean lower supply of disposable funds for the government. This translates to slackening of the economy owing to lesser spending by the government on essential nation building activities like infrastructure, social responsibilities, healthcare, military etc.

Again, when some pre-poll candidate is vowing to increase budget of healthcare, because the supply of money is limited, either that may lead to less expenditure in fields like infrastructure or increasing money supply by levying excess tax from companies or the common people. Demand (of voters) that can be met is a function of the available resources. Scarce supply cannot lead to greater supply of any commodity.

It is not that candidates do not understand the implication of the sky-high promises they make, if they were to execute them. However, the voters also play a part in these untenable statements by falling for it and electing that candidate.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

Anything in the economy is based on supply and demand. Abundant availability on the supply side is required to produce adequate goods. However, the candidates only seem to appease the demand of the voters in pre-election rallies. Whether the supply side is abundant enough to cater to that demand or the resource is actually scarce, is a point left for the to-be-formed government to tackle after the elections.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 2, Problem 1E

To determine

When the candidates promise the moon in pre-election time, what fundamental economic logic is swept under the brush and not mentioned by the candidates?

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1E

The economic concept, 1) only that much of demand can be met for which resources are available and 2) normally resources are scarce, is ignored by the candidates when making pre-poll promises.

Explanation of Solution

Let us take the example of the fine business person that American President, Mr. Donald trump is. Before elections, Trump had promised to revive the business competitiveness. For this, he proposed corporate tax cut from substantial 35% to 21%. He went by his words and reduced the tax rate in his first term. Now let us see the likely results. Tax cuts mean greater profit for the companies. That is fine for the corporates. However, what is in store for the economy?

Tax cuts mean lower supply of disposable funds for the government. This translates to slackening of the economy owing to lesser spending by the government on essential nation building activities like infrastructure, social responsibilities, healthcare, military etc.

Again, when some pre-poll candidate is vowing to increase budget of healthcare, because the supply of money is limited, either that may lead to less expenditure in fields like infrastructure or increasing money supply by levying excess tax from companies or the common people. Demand (of voters) that can be met is a function of the available resources. Scarce supply cannot lead to greater supply of any commodity.

It is not that candidates do not understand the implication of the sky-high promises they make, if they were to execute them. However, the voters also play a part in these untenable statements by falling for it and electing that candidate.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

Anything in the economy is based on supply and demand. Abundant availability on the supply side is required to produce adequate goods. However, the candidates only seem to appease the demand of the voters in pre-election rallies. Whether the supply side is abundant enough to cater to that demand or the resource is actually scarce, is a point left for the to-be-formed government to tackle after the elections.

Answer 6

Chapter 2, Problem 1E

To determine

When the candidates promise the moon in pre-election time, what fundamental economic logic is swept under the brush and not mentioned by the candidates?

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1E

The economic concept, 1) only that much of demand can be met for which resources are available and 2) normally resources are scarce, is ignored by the candidates when making pre-poll promises.

Explanation of Solution

Let us take the example of the fine business person that American President, Mr. Donald trump is. Before elections, Trump had promised to revive the business competitiveness. For this, he proposed corporate tax cut from substantial 35% to 21%. He went by his words and reduced the tax rate in his first term. Now let us see the likely results. Tax cuts mean greater profit for the companies. That is fine for the corporates. However, what is in store for the economy?

Tax cuts mean lower supply of disposable funds for the government. This translates to slackening of the economy owing to lesser spending by the government on essential nation building activities like infrastructure, social responsibilities, healthcare, military etc.

Again, when some pre-poll candidate is vowing to increase budget of healthcare, because the supply of money is limited, either that may lead to less expenditure in fields like infrastructure or increasing money supply by levying excess tax from companies or the common people. Demand (of voters) that can be met is a function of the available resources. Scarce supply cannot lead to greater supply of any commodity.

It is not that candidates do not understand the implication of the sky-high promises they make, if they were to execute them. However, the voters also play a part in these untenable statements by falling for it and electing that candidate.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

Anything in the economy is based on supply and demand. Abundant availability on the supply side is required to produce adequate goods. However, the candidates only seem to appease the demand of the voters in pre-election rallies. Whether the supply side is abundant enough to cater to that demand or the resource is actually scarce, is a point left for the to-be-formed government to tackle after the elections.

Answer 7

Chapter 2, Problem 1E

To determine

When the candidates promise the moon in pre-election time, what fundamental economic logic is swept under the brush and not mentioned by the candidates?

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1E

The economic concept, 1) only that much of demand can be met for which resources are available and 2) normally resources are scarce, is ignored by the candidates when making pre-poll promises.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Explanation of Solution

Let us take the example of the fine business person that American President, Mr. Donald trump is. Before elections, Trump had promised to revive the business competitiveness. For this, he proposed corporate tax cut from substantial 35% to 21%. He went by his words and reduced the tax rate in his first term. Now let us see the likely results. Tax cuts mean greater profit for the companies. That is fine for the corporates. However, what is in store for the economy?

Tax cuts mean lower supply of disposable funds for the government. This translates to slackening of the economy owing to lesser spending by the government on essential nation building activities like infrastructure, social responsibilities, healthcare, military etc.

Again, when some pre-poll candidate is vowing to increase budget of healthcare, because the supply of money is limited, either that may lead to less expenditure in fields like infrastructure or increasing money supply by levying excess tax from companies or the common people. Demand (of voters) that can be met is a function of the available resources. Scarce supply cannot lead to greater supply of any commodity.

It is not that candidates do not understand the implication of the sky-high promises they make, if they were to execute them. However, the voters also play a part in these untenable statements by falling for it and electing that candidate.

Answer 12

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

Anything in the economy is based on supply and demand. Abundant availability on the supply side is required to produce adequate goods. However, the candidates only seem to appease the demand of the voters in pre-election rallies. Whether the supply side is abundant enough to cater to that demand or the resource is actually scarce, is a point left for the to-be-formed government to tackle after the elections.

Answer 13

Ch. 2 - Prob. 1E Ch. 2 - Prob. 2E Ch. 2 - Prob. 3E Ch. 2 - Prob. 4E Ch. 2 - Prob. 5E Ch. 2 - Prob. 6E Ch. 2 - Prob. 7E Ch. 2 - Prob. 8E Ch. 2 - Prob. 9E Ch. 2 - Prob. 10E

When the candidates promise the moon in pre-election time, what fundamental economic logic is swept under the brush and not mentioned by the candidates?

When the candidates promise the moon in pre-election time, what fundamental economic logic is swept under the brush and not mentioned by the candidates?

Answer to Problem 1E

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 2 Solutions