The elements having the ground-state electronic configurations different from what we would expect from their positions in the periodic table are to be listed. Concept Introduction: The distribution of the electrons present in an atom in the respective atomic orbitals is known as the electronic configuration. However, some elements have different ground-state configurations than expected from their placement in the periodic table. To determine: The elements having different ground-state configurations than expected from their placement in the periodic table.
The elements having the ground-state electronic configurations different from what we would expect from their positions in the periodic table are to be listed. Concept Introduction: The distribution of the electrons present in an atom in the respective atomic orbitals is known as the electronic configuration. However, some elements have different ground-state configurations than expected from their placement in the periodic table. To determine: The elements having different ground-state configurations than expected from their placement in the periodic table.
The elements having the ground-state electronic configurations different from what we would expect from their positions in the periodic table are to be listed.
Concept Introduction:
The distribution of the electrons present in an atom in the respective atomic orbitals is known as the electronic configuration. However, some elements have different ground-state configurations than expected from their placement in the periodic table.
To determine: The elements having different ground-state configurations than expected from their placement in the periodic table.
Expert Solution & Answer
Answer to Problem 140AE
Answer
The elements
Cr,Cu,Nb,Mo,Tc,Ru,Rh,Pd,Ag,Pt,AuandRg exhibit electronic configurations different from their expected ones.
Explanation of Solution
The filling of orbitals according to their energy levels gives the expected ground-state electronic configurations for the elements. And the following elements exhibit ground-state configurations that are different from what was expected with respect to their placement in the periodic table.
In the case of Chromium and copper, the expected configuration in accordance to the Aufbau principle would be,
This happens as completely filled sub levels are more stable than the partly filled ones. Also, a half filled sub level is more stable than the partly filled one.
In the case of Niobium, the expected configuration in accordance to the Aufbau principle would be,
Nb=(1s22s22p63s23p63d104s24p65s24d3)
But the actual configuration it exhibits is,
Nb=(1s22s22p63s23p63d104s24p65s14d4)
The repulsion of two electrons within the same orbital pushes one electron from the
5s to the
4d orbital.
Some other elements that exhibit electronic configurations different from expected ones are,
The compounds that portray the
d10 systems do so in order to attain extra stability. In case of the
RuandRh, such configurations are attained by these compounds in order to attain extra stability by attaining a completely filled
T2g orbitals.
Conclusion
The elements having the ground-state electronic configurations different from what we would expect from their positions in the periodic table are
Cr,Cu,Nb,Mo,Tc,Ru,Rh,Pd,Ag,Pt,AuandRg.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Experiment 1
Data Table 1: Conservation of Mass - Initial Mass
Data Table 1
Data Table 2
Data Table 3
Data Table 4
Panel 1
Photo 1
Data Table 5
Reaction Mass of test tube and 5.0% HC₂H₂O2 (g)
#
(A)
(B)
Mass of NaHCO, (g) Mass of balloon and NaHCO, (g)
(C)
0.10
1
0829
14.38g
0.20
2
0.929
14.29g
0.35
1.00g
3
14.25g
0.50
1.14g
14.29
Experiment 1
Data Table 2: Moles of HC2H3O2
Reaction Volume of Mass of
Moles of HC₂H₂O₂
5.0%
Vinegar
(g)
(ML)
5.0
0.25
0042 mol
2
5.0
0.25
0042 mol
3
5.0
0.25
0042 mol
5.0
0.25
0042 mol
Experiment 1
Data Table 3: Moles of NaHCO3
Reaction Mass of NaHCO (g)
10g
20g
35g
50g
Experiment 1
Data Table 4: Theoretical Yield of CO₂
Reaction #
1
2
3
Experiment 1
Total mass before reaction (g)
(D=A+C)
15.29
15.21g
15.25g
15.349
Exercise 1
Data Table 1
Data Table 2
Data Table 3
Data Table 4
Panel 1
Photo 1
Data Table 5
Exercise 1-
Data Table 1
Data Table 2
DataTable 3
Data Table 4
Panel 1
Photo 1
Data Table 5
Exercise 1-
Moles of NaHCO
0012 mol
0025 mol
0044 mol
0062 mol…
The chemical reaction you investigated is a two-step reaction. What type of reaction occurs in each step? How did you determine your answer?
What is the relationship between the limiting reactant and theoretical yield of CO2?
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, chemistry and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Author:Steven D. Gammon, Ebbing, Darrell Ebbing, Steven D., Darrell; Gammon, Darrell Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon, Darrell D.; Gammon, Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon; Darrell
Author:Steven D. Gammon, Ebbing, Darrell Ebbing, Steven D., Darrell; Gammon, Darrell Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon, Darrell D.; Gammon, Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon; Darrell
Quantum Numbers, Atomic Orbitals, and Electron Configurations; Author: Professor Dave Explains;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aoi4j8es4gQ;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY