
Concept explainers
1.
To prepare: Income statement of the company for the year using variable costing.
1.

Explanation of Solution
S. Company Income Statement (Variable Costing) For the year ended December 31, 2017 | ||||
Particulars | Amount ($) | Amount($) | ||
Sales | 24,500,000 | |||
Total Direct Material | (2,800,000) | |||
Total Direct Labor | (4,200,000) | |||
Variable Production | (2,100,000) | |||
Variable Selling & Administrative Overheads | (770,000) | (9,870,000) | ||
Contribution Margin | 14,630,000 | |||
Fixed Production Overheads | (7,000,000) | |||
Fixed Selling & Administrative Overheads | (4,250,000) | (11,250,000) | ||
Net Income | 3,380,000 | |||
Table (1) |
The net income at the year ending Dec 31, 2017 under variable costing is $3,380,000.
Working Note:
The calculation of variable production overhead is,
Where, number of units can be calculated as,
The calculation of variable cost per unit is,
Substitute 70,000 for number of units and $30 for variable overhead per unit in the above formula.
Thus, the net income at the year ending Dec 31, 2017 under variable costing is $3,380,000.
2.
To prepare: Income statement for the year using absorption costing.
2.

Explanation of Solution
S. Company Income Statement (Absorption Costing) For the year ended December 31, 2017 | ||||
Particulars | Amount($) | Amount($) | ||
Sales | 24,500,000 | |||
Cost of Goods Sold (Working Note) | (14,000,000) | |||
Gross Margin | 10,500,000 | |||
Variable Selling & Administrative Overheads | (770,000) | |||
Fixed Selling & Administrative Overheads | (4,250,000) | (5,020,000) | ||
Net Income | 5,480,000 | |||
Table (2) |
The net income at the year ending Dec 31, 2017 under absorption costing is $5,480,000.
Working note:
Calculation of cost of goods sold is,
Where, the cost per unit can be calculated as,
Particulars | Amount ($) Per Unit | |||
Direct Material | 40 | |||
Direct Labor | 60 | |||
Variable Overheads | 30 | |||
Fixed Overheads | 70 | |||
Total Cost Per Unit | 200 | |||
Table (3) |
Substitute 70,000 for number of units sold and $200 for cost per unit in the above formula.
Thus, the net income at the year ending Dec 31, 2017 under absorption costing is $5,480,000.
3.
To explain: The circumstances under which the reported income becomes identical under both absorption and variable costing.
- When the closing stock of the firm becomes zero, the reported incomes under both absorption and variable costing become identical.
- The only difference between the variable costing and absorption costing is the valuation of closing or ending inventory, so, whenever the value of ending inventory becomes equal or same, the incomes under both costing methods becomes identical.
Thus, the reported income becomes identical under both absorption and variable method when the values of closing inventory under both the methods become equal.
3.
To explain: The circumstances under which the reported income becomes identical under both absorption and variable costing.
3.

Explanation of Solution
- When the closing stock of the firm becomes zero, the reported incomes under both absorption and variable costing become identical.
- The only difference between the variable costing and absorption costing is the valuation of closing or ending inventory, so, whenever the value of ending inventory becomes equal or same, the incomes under both costing methods becomes identical.
Thus, the reported income becomes identical under both absorption and variable method when the values of closing inventory under both the methods become equal.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 19 Solutions
Financial and Managerial Accounting
- Eldora Systems is a privately-held firm. You are asked to estimate its value using market data from a comparable public firm. The comparable firm has a stock price of $32.00, net income of $48,000, and 12,000 shares outstanding. Eldora Systems has an earnings per share (EPS) of $4.00. What is the estimated value per share of Eldora Systems? A) $12.00 B) $16.00 C) $20.00 D) $32.00 E) $28.00arrow_forwardNeed urgently soln and don't answer if you don't know value sure unhelarrow_forwardProvide answerarrow_forward
- Fennel Industries had 6,420 actual direct labor hours at an actual rate of $15.60 per hour. Original production had been budgeted for 950 units, but only 880 units were actually produced. Labor standards were 7.2 hours per completed unit at a standard rate of $16.10 per hour. What is the direct labor rate variance?arrow_forwardWhat is the bank costarrow_forwardHelp this accounting question answerarrow_forward
- AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337272094Author:WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Accounting Information SystemsAccountingISBN:9781337619202Author:Hall, James A.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
- Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis...AccountingISBN:9780134475585Author:Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. RajanPublisher:PEARSONIntermediate AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259722660Author:J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M ThomasPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationFinancial and Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259726705Author:John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting PrinciplesPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





