Recent DNA evidence suggests to some plants taxonomists that the traditional way of classifying flowering plants is not correct, and that flowering plants need to be completely reclassified. Other botanists disagree, saying it would be chaotic and unwise to disregard the historical classification groups. Argue for and against keeping traditional classification schemes.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Textbook Question

Chapter 19, Problem 1TC

Recent DNA evidence suggests to some plants taxonomists that the traditional way of classifying flowering plants is not correct, and that flowering plants need to be completely reclassified.

Other botanists disagree, saying it would be chaotic and unwise to disregard the historical classification groups. Argue for and against keeping traditional classification schemes.

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

To argue:

In the favor and against keeping traditional classification schemes that the traditional way of classifying flowering plants is not correct and botanists disagree by saying that it would be chaotic.

Introduction:

A systematic or refined approach is required for the classification of organisms with the growing data from sources. A new system of classification is required as evolution is not always unidirectional and it is complicated process. Few botanists claim that traditional system is not correct and needed to be reclassified is on the basis of DNA as DNA based classification removes gaps in the system that was followed (traditional).

Explanation of Solution

The traditional system of classification is used and well accepted for several years so it would be unwise to completely change it and a sudden introduction of new system will create chaos and vast amount of activity by scientists will be required globally. It would be almost impossible to match the records that already exist and interpret the same with the modern method in short period of time.

The best way would be gradually refining and continue use of certain essential concepts of traditional system such as “binomial nomenclature”. This approach will modernize the system of classification and it will also be accepted globally with least amount of confusion over the terminologies and methods.

Conclusion

The best way for the concerned issue would be gradual change in the classification system.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

You have returned to college to become a phylogeneticist. One of the first things you wish to do is determine how mammals, birds, and reptiles are related. Like any good scientist, you need to consider all available data objectively and without a preconceived “correct” answer. In pursuit of that, you should produce a phylogenetic tree based only on morphological features that show birds and mammals are more closely related. You will then produce a totally different tree, also using morphological features, that shows birds and reptiles are more closely related. Do not forget to include all three groups in both your trees. Based solely off the trees you produce, which relationship would you consider the more likely and why? Once you have answered that question, provide a brief summary of the “modern” understanding of the relationship between these three groups.

true or false, the reason geckos can walk on walls is hydrogen bonding between their foot pads and the moisture on the wall.

Biology laboratory problem Please help. thank you You have 20 ul of DNA solution and 6X DNA loading buffer solution. You have to mix your DNA solution and DNA loading buffer before load DNA in an agarose gel. The concentration of the DNA loading buffer must be 1X in the DNA and DNA-loading buffer mixture after you mix them. For that, I will add _____ ul of 6X loading buffer to the 20 ul DNA solution.

Answer 2

Textbook Question

Chapter 19, Problem 1TC

Recent DNA evidence suggests to some plants taxonomists that the traditional way of classifying flowering plants is not correct, and that flowering plants need to be completely reclassified.

Other botanists disagree, saying it would be chaotic and unwise to disregard the historical classification groups. Argue for and against keeping traditional classification schemes.

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

To argue:

In the favor and against keeping traditional classification schemes that the traditional way of classifying flowering plants is not correct and botanists disagree by saying that it would be chaotic.

Introduction:

A systematic or refined approach is required for the classification of organisms with the growing data from sources. A new system of classification is required as evolution is not always unidirectional and it is complicated process. Few botanists claim that traditional system is not correct and needed to be reclassified is on the basis of DNA as DNA based classification removes gaps in the system that was followed (traditional).

Explanation of Solution

The traditional system of classification is used and well accepted for several years so it would be unwise to completely change it and a sudden introduction of new system will create chaos and vast amount of activity by scientists will be required globally. It would be almost impossible to match the records that already exist and interpret the same with the modern method in short period of time.

The best way would be gradually refining and continue use of certain essential concepts of traditional system such as “binomial nomenclature”. This approach will modernize the system of classification and it will also be accepted globally with least amount of confusion over the terminologies and methods.

Conclusion

The best way for the concerned issue would be gradual change in the classification system.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Textbook Question

Chapter 19, Problem 1TC

Recent DNA evidence suggests to some plants taxonomists that the traditional way of classifying flowering plants is not correct, and that flowering plants need to be completely reclassified.

Other botanists disagree, saying it would be chaotic and unwise to disregard the historical classification groups. Argue for and against keeping traditional classification schemes.

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

To argue:

In the favor and against keeping traditional classification schemes that the traditional way of classifying flowering plants is not correct and botanists disagree by saying that it would be chaotic.

Introduction:

A systematic or refined approach is required for the classification of organisms with the growing data from sources. A new system of classification is required as evolution is not always unidirectional and it is complicated process. Few botanists claim that traditional system is not correct and needed to be reclassified is on the basis of DNA as DNA based classification removes gaps in the system that was followed (traditional).

Explanation of Solution

The traditional system of classification is used and well accepted for several years so it would be unwise to completely change it and a sudden introduction of new system will create chaos and vast amount of activity by scientists will be required globally. It would be almost impossible to match the records that already exist and interpret the same with the modern method in short period of time.

The best way would be gradually refining and continue use of certain essential concepts of traditional system such as “binomial nomenclature”. This approach will modernize the system of classification and it will also be accepted globally with least amount of confusion over the terminologies and methods.

Conclusion

The best way for the concerned issue would be gradual change in the classification system.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Textbook Question

Chapter 19, Problem 1TC

Recent DNA evidence suggests to some plants taxonomists that the traditional way of classifying flowering plants is not correct, and that flowering plants need to be completely reclassified.

Other botanists disagree, saying it would be chaotic and unwise to disregard the historical classification groups. Argue for and against keeping traditional classification schemes.

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

To argue:

In the favor and against keeping traditional classification schemes that the traditional way of classifying flowering plants is not correct and botanists disagree by saying that it would be chaotic.

Introduction:

A systematic or refined approach is required for the classification of organisms with the growing data from sources. A new system of classification is required as evolution is not always unidirectional and it is complicated process. Few botanists claim that traditional system is not correct and needed to be reclassified is on the basis of DNA as DNA based classification removes gaps in the system that was followed (traditional).

Explanation of Solution

The traditional system of classification is used and well accepted for several years so it would be unwise to completely change it and a sudden introduction of new system will create chaos and vast amount of activity by scientists will be required globally. It would be almost impossible to match the records that already exist and interpret the same with the modern method in short period of time.

The best way would be gradually refining and continue use of certain essential concepts of traditional system such as “binomial nomenclature”. This approach will modernize the system of classification and it will also be accepted globally with least amount of confusion over the terminologies and methods.

Conclusion

The best way for the concerned issue would be gradual change in the classification system.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Textbook Question

Answer 6

Textbook Question

Answer 7

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

To argue:

In the favor and against keeping traditional classification schemes that the traditional way of classifying flowering plants is not correct and botanists disagree by saying that it would be chaotic.

Introduction:

A systematic or refined approach is required for the classification of organisms with the growing data from sources. A new system of classification is required as evolution is not always unidirectional and it is complicated process. Few botanists claim that traditional system is not correct and needed to be reclassified is on the basis of DNA as DNA based classification removes gaps in the system that was followed (traditional).

Explanation of Solution

The traditional system of classification is used and well accepted for several years so it would be unwise to completely change it and a sudden introduction of new system will create chaos and vast amount of activity by scientists will be required globally. It would be almost impossible to match the records that already exist and interpret the same with the modern method in short period of time.

The best way would be gradually refining and continue use of certain essential concepts of traditional system such as “binomial nomenclature”. This approach will modernize the system of classification and it will also be accepted globally with least amount of confusion over the terminologies and methods.

Conclusion

The best way for the concerned issue would be gradual change in the classification system.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

To argue:

In the favor and against keeping traditional classification schemes that the traditional way of classifying flowering plants is not correct and botanists disagree by saying that it would be chaotic.

Introduction:

A systematic or refined approach is required for the classification of organisms with the growing data from sources. A new system of classification is required as evolution is not always unidirectional and it is complicated process. Few botanists claim that traditional system is not correct and needed to be reclassified is on the basis of DNA as DNA based classification removes gaps in the system that was followed (traditional).

Explanation of Solution

The traditional system of classification is used and well accepted for several years so it would be unwise to completely change it and a sudden introduction of new system will create chaos and vast amount of activity by scientists will be required globally. It would be almost impossible to match the records that already exist and interpret the same with the modern method in short period of time.

The best way would be gradually refining and continue use of certain essential concepts of traditional system such as “binomial nomenclature”. This approach will modernize the system of classification and it will also be accepted globally with least amount of confusion over the terminologies and methods.

Conclusion

The best way for the concerned issue would be gradual change in the classification system.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Summary Introduction

To argue:

In the favor and against keeping traditional classification schemes that the traditional way of classifying flowering plants is not correct and botanists disagree by saying that it would be chaotic.

Introduction:

A systematic or refined approach is required for the classification of organisms with the growing data from sources. A new system of classification is required as evolution is not always unidirectional and it is complicated process. Few botanists claim that traditional system is not correct and needed to be reclassified is on the basis of DNA as DNA based classification removes gaps in the system that was followed (traditional).

Answer 12

Explanation of Solution

The traditional system of classification is used and well accepted for several years so it would be unwise to completely change it and a sudden introduction of new system will create chaos and vast amount of activity by scientists will be required globally. It would be almost impossible to match the records that already exist and interpret the same with the modern method in short period of time.

The best way would be gradually refining and continue use of certain essential concepts of traditional system such as “binomial nomenclature”. This approach will modernize the system of classification and it will also be accepted globally with least amount of confusion over the terminologies and methods.

Answer 13

Conclusion

The best way for the concerned issue would be gradual change in the classification system.

Answer 14

Ch. 19.1 - Prob. 1NS.1QC Ch. 19.1 - Prob. 1NS.2QC Ch. 19.1 - Prob. 1CYP Ch. 19.1 - Prob. 2CYP Ch. 19.1 - Prob. 3CYP Ch. 19.2 - Prob. 1CYP Ch. 19.2 - Prob. 2CYP Ch. 19.2 - Prob. 3CYP Ch. 19.3 - Interpret the ancestral or derived state of traits...Ch. 19.3 - Prob. 2CYP

Concept explainers

Videos

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 19 Solutions