Concept explainers
Recent DNA evidence suggests to some plants taxonomists that the traditional way of classifying flowering plants is not correct, and that flowering plants need to be completely reclassified.
Other botanists disagree, saying it would be chaotic and unwise to disregard the historical classification groups. Argue for and against keeping traditional classification schemes.
To argue:
In the favor and against keeping traditional classification schemes that the traditional way of classifying flowering plants is not correct and botanists disagree by saying that it would be chaotic.
Introduction:
A systematic or refined approach is required for the classification of organisms with the growing data from sources. A new system of classification is required as evolution is not always unidirectional and it is complicated process. Few botanists claim that traditional system is not correct and needed to be reclassified is on the basis of DNA as DNA based classification removes gaps in the system that was followed (traditional).
Explanation of Solution
The traditional system of classification is used and well accepted for several years so it would be unwise to completely change it and a sudden introduction of new system will create chaos and vast amount of activity by scientists will be required globally. It would be almost impossible to match the records that already exist and interpret the same with the modern method in short period of time.
The best way would be gradually refining and continue use of certain essential concepts of traditional system such as “binomial nomenclature”. This approach will modernize the system of classification and it will also be accepted globally with least amount of confusion over the terminologies and methods.
The best way for the concerned issue would be gradual change in the classification system.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- A botanist is studying the phylogenetic relationships of plants using only their their morphological traits. Would specialized plants (like desert or rainforest plants) complicate this process, why or why not? Select all that apply Select all that apply: a. Yes; they often appear similar but are not closely related to each other Ob. Yes; their traits are similar to plants across many environments c. No; their traits are shared by a common ancestor Od. Yes; they gained different traits than their close relatives because of their environment cross out cross out cross out cross outarrow_forwardThe work of plant taxonomists of the 20th century who identified /established the different families of flowering plants based mainly on morphological and anatomical details is still valued and being used today, despite the general acceptance of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) as a classification system for the flowering plants. Why is it so?arrow_forwardGive a brief coverage about molecular systematics and indicate it’s importance in the development of new cultivarsarrow_forward
- Construct a simple Angiosperm cladogram and phenogram representing the character matrix. Provide the character matrixarrow_forwardWhen classifying plants which of the following replaces the phylum taxon?arrow_forward1) For each of the organisms in the following table, complete the empty columns with an appropriate answer for each taxa. Organism Gymnosperm Angiosperm Sister Taxa Derived Trait Ancestral Trait Mode of Reproductionarrow_forward
- Linnaeus is considered as father of taxonomy. Name two other botanists known for their contribution to the field of plant taxonomy?arrow_forwardLook at Fig. 33.1 and determine whether green algae, bryophytes, and vascular plants are monophyletic or paraphyletic.arrow_forwardPlease help complete the table and please include reference if there isarrow_forward
- Biology (MindTap Course List)BiologyISBN:9781337392938Author:Eldra Solomon, Charles Martin, Diana W. Martin, Linda R. BergPublisher:Cengage LearningBiology Today and Tomorrow without Physiology (Mi...BiologyISBN:9781305117396Author:Cecie Starr, Christine Evers, Lisa StarrPublisher:Cengage Learning