Subpart (a):
Classifying goods
Subpart (a):
Explanation of Solution
Apples, open-heart surgery, cable TV, farm-raised salmon and the Yosemite National Park can be classified as excludable goods. On the other hand, Central Park, Chinese language, idea of calculus are considered as non-excludable.
Concept Introduction:
Non-excludable good: A good is non-excludable if people who do not pay cannot be easily prevented from using the good.
Non-rival good: A good is non-rival if one person’s use of the good does not reduce the ability of the other person to use the same good.
Public good: A public good is non-excludable and non-rival in nature.
Private good: A private good is excludable and rival in nature.
Club good: A club good is excludable but non-rival in nature.
Common Resource: A common resource is a good which is non-excludable but rival in nature.
Subpart (b):
Classifying goods
Subpart (b):
Explanation of Solution
Apples, open-heart surgery and farm-raised salmon can be classified as rivals. On the other hand, cable TV, Central Park, Chinese language, idea of calculus and the Yosemite National Park are considered as non-rival.
Concept Introduction:
Non-excludable good: A good is non-excludable if people who do not pay cannot be easily prevented from using the good.
Non-rival good: A good is non-rival if one person’s use of the good does not reduce the ability of the other person to use the same good.
Public good: A public good is non-excludable and non-rival in nature.
Private good: A private good is excludable and rival in nature.
Club good: A club good is excludable but non-rival in nature.
Common Resource: A common resource is a good which is non-excludable but rival in nature.
Subpart (c):
Classifying goods
Subpart (c):
Explanation of Solution
Since apples, open-heart surgery and farm-raised salmon are excludable and rival; they can be classified as private goods. On the other hand, Central Park, Chinese language and idea of calculus are considered as public good as they are non-excludable and non-rival.
The Cable TV and Yosemite are non-rival private goods or club goods, as they are non-rival but excludable. However, none is a common resource other than if the Central Park gets very crowded reducing the amount of park available to others, turning it then into a common resource.
Subpart (d):
Classifying goods
Subpart (d):
Explanation of Solution
The people can be from the Yosemite National Park at the entrance. This is possible as there are gates at every entrance for cars and they can do necessitate hikers to use permits.
Concept Introduction:
Non-excludable good: A good is non-excludable if people who do not pay cannot be easily prevented from using the good.
Non-rival good: A good is non-rival if one person’s use of the good does not reduce the ability of the other person to use the same good.
Public good: A public good is non-excludable and non-rival in nature.
Private good: A private good is excludable and rival in nature.
Club good: A club good is excludable but non-rival in nature.
Common Resource: A common resource is a good which is non-excludable but rival in nature.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 19 Solutions
EBK MODERN PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS
- Select a number that describes the type of firm organization indicated. Descriptions of Firm Organizations: 1. has one owner-manager who is personally responsible for all aspects of the business, including its debts 2. one type of partner takes part in managing the firm and is personally liable for the firm's actions and debts, and the other type of partner takes no part in the management of the firm and risks only the money that they have invested 3. owners are not personally responsible for anything that is done in the name of the firm 4. owned by the government but is usually under the direction of a more or less independent, state-appointed board 5. established with the explicit objective of providing goods or services but only in a manner that just covers its costs 6. has two or more joint owners, each of whom is personally responsible for all of the partnership's debts Type of Firm Organization a. limited partnership b. single proprietorship c. corporation Correct Numberarrow_forwardThe table below provides the total revenues and costs for a small landscaping company in a recent year. Total Revenues ($) 250,000 Total Costs ($) - wages and salaries 100,000 -risk-free return of 2% on owner's capital of $25,000 500 -interest on bank loan 1,000 - cost of supplies 27,000 - depreciation of capital equipment 8,000 - additional wages the owner could have earned in next best alternative 30,000 -risk premium of 4% on owner's capital of $25,000 1,000 The economic profits for this firm are ○ A. $83,000. B. $82,500. OC. $114,000. OD. $83,500. ○ E. $112,500.arrow_forwardOutput TFC ($) TVC ($) TC ($) (Q) 2 100 104 204 3 100 203 303 4 100 300 400 5 100 405 505 6 100 512 612 7 100 621 721 Given the information about short-run costs in the table above, we can conclude that the firm will minimize the average total cost of production when Q = (Round your response to the nearest whole number.)arrow_forward
- The following data show the total output for a firm when specified amounts of labour are combined with a fixed amount of capital. Assume that the wage per unit of labour is $20 and the cost of the capital is $100. Labour per unit of time 0 1 Total Output 0 25 T 2 3 4 5 75 137 212 267 The marginal product of labour is at its maximum when the firm changes the amount of labour hired from ○ A. 0 to 1 unit. ○ B. 3 to 4 units. OC. 2 to 3 units. OD. 1 to 2 units. ○ E. 4 to 5 units.arrow_forwardThe table below provides the annual revenues and costs for a family-owned firm producing catered meals. Total Revenues ($) 600,000 Total Costs ($) - wages and salaries 250,000 -risk-free return of 7% on owners' capital of $300,000 21,000 - rent 101,000 - depreciation of capital equipment 22,000 -risk premium of 9% on owners' capital of $300,000 27,000 - intermediate inputs 146,000 -forgone wages of owners in alternative employment -interest on bank loan 70,000 11,000 The implicit costs for this family-owned firm are ○ A. $70,000. OB. $97,000. OC. $589,000. OD. $118,000. ○ E. $48,000.arrow_forwardSuppose a production function for a firm takes the following algebraic form: Q= 2KL - (0.3)L², where Q is the output of sweaters per day. Now suppose the firm is operating with 10 units of capital (K = 10) and 6 units of labour (L = 6). What is the output of sweaters? A. 64 sweaters per day OB. 49 sweaters per day OC. 109 sweaters per day OD. 72 sweaters per day OE. 118 sweaters per dayarrow_forward
- 3. Consider a course allocation problem with strict and non-responsive preferences. Isthere a mechanism that is efficient and strategy-proof? If so, state the mechanismand show that it satisfies efficiency and strategyproofness. {hint serial dictatorship and show using example}4. Consider a course allocation problem with responsive preferences and at least 3students. Is there a mechanism that is efficient and strategy-proof that is not theSerial Dictatorship? If so, state the mechanism and show that it satisfies efficiencyand strategyproofness.5. Suggest a mechanism for allocating students to courses in a situation where preferences are non-responsive, and study its properties (efficiency and strategyproofness). Please be creativearrow_forward3. Consider a course allocation problem with strict and non-responsive preferences. Isthere a mechanism that is efficient and strategy-proof? If so, state the mechanismand show that it satisfies efficiency and strategyproofness. {hint serial dictatorship}4. Consider a course allocation problem with responsive preferences and at least 3students. Is there a mechanism that is efficient and strategy-proof that is not theSerial Dictatorship? If so, state the mechanism and show that it satisfies efficiencyand strategyproofness.5. Suggest a mechanism for allocating students to courses in a situation where preferences are non-responsive, and study its properties (efficiency and strategyproofness). Please be creativearrow_forward2. a) Consider a market where one firm (firm 1) currently produces, but a second firm (firm 2) is intending to enter and sell an identical product. The market has inverse demand given by p = 40 – Q, where Q is the total output sold in the market. Firm 1 has a marginal cost of 16 and firm 2 has a marginal cost of c < 16, with no fixed cost for either firm. Firm 2 has a choice of competing on price or quantity, with firms making their choices simultaneously (i.e. the market will be either a Bertrand or Cournot duopoly). If you were advising firm 2 on entering this market, how would you advise it to compete? To what extent would the size of firm 2’s cost advantage affect your advice? b) Now assume that firm 2 is aware that other firms are considering entering the market, so the market may over time change from a duopoly to an oligopoly with more than two firms. This would not change the nature of competition (i.e. any additional firms would set price or quantity in line with the first…arrow_forward
- 1. Consider two firms (i=1,2) interacting in the market. Assume that firms compete in quantities and therefore they choose either to cooperate or not in each round. If a firm deviates it earns monopoly profit for a round and a punishment phase will follow from next round onwards (for ever) where both firms choose the Cournot quantity. Assume a discounting factor & and that firms meet in the market in every period. The demand facing the industry is p = 1 92. Let Q = q1 + 92 denote the aggregate industry output - 91 - level. Assume further that production is costless.arrow_forwardQ4 (30 points) Subsidy in Auctions Consider a sealed-bid second-price auction with two bidders. Valuation of bidder 1 is drawn from the uniform distribution on [0, 100], and valuation of bidder 2 is independently drawn from the uniform distribution on [0, 300].arrow_forward$ A C ° Output Refer to the diagram, which pertains to a purely competitive firm. Which of the following statements is most accurate?arrow_forward
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education