The difference between the two ways of beating competition. Concept introduction: Competition in a market: It is a way by which the existing firm in the market tries to have dominance in the market with a larger market share. The way of dominance depends on the quality, restrictive laws, and the price of goods provided to the consumers. Explanation: Yes, there is a lot of difference between the two ways of beating competition. Where the first way is to provide good quality services at low price and the other way is to restrict the rival’s entry with laws. When a firm decides to decrease the price of its good and improve the quality of services rendered to the customers then it benefits fully to the consumers. When a firm decreases the price of the product then the purchasing power of the customer increases. Their ability to get large quantity of goods at the same income level increases. This increases consumer welfare. On the other hand, when a firm gets a law passed against the rival competitors then it harms the entrant as well as the consumers. The number of firms in the market decreases due to the restrictive laws. Hence, the consumer faces higher price and get very few choices. This leads to decrease in the welfare of the consumer as well as the entrant firm. Whereas, the existing firm in the market gets benefited from the restrictive laws. This is because of higher price and less competition in the market.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 19, Problem 1DQ

To determine

The difference between the two ways of beating competition.

Concept introduction:

Competition in a market:

It is a way by which the existing firm in the market tries to have dominance in the market with a larger market share. The way of dominance depends on the quality, restrictive laws, and the price of goods provided to the consumers.

Explanation:

Yes, there is a lot of difference between the two ways of beating competition. Where the first way is to provide good quality services at low price and the other way is to restrict the rival’s entry with laws.

When a firm decides to decrease the price of its good and improve the quality of services rendered to the customers then it benefits fully to the consumers. When a firm decreases the price of the product then the purchasing power of the customer increases. Their ability to get large quantity of goods at the same income level increases. This increases consumer welfare.

On the other hand, when a firm gets a law passed against the rival competitors then it harms the entrant as well as the consumers. The number of firms in the market decreases due to the restrictive laws. Hence, the consumer faces higher price and get very few choices. This leads to decrease in the welfare of the consumer as well as the entrant firm.

Whereas, the existing firm in the market gets benefited from the restrictive laws. This is because of higher price and less competition in the market.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Yes, there is a lot of difference between the two ways of beating competition. Where the first way is to provide good quality services at low price and the other way is to restrict the rival’s entry with laws.

When a firm decides to decrease the price of its good and improve the quality of services rendered to the customers then it benefits fully to the consumers. When a firm decreases the price of the product then the purchasing power of the customer increases. Their ability to get large quantity of goods at the same income level increases. This increases consumer welfare.

On the other hand, when a firm gets a law passed against the rival competitors then it harms the entrant as well as the consumers. The number of firms in the market decreases due to the restrictive laws. Hence, the consumer faces higher price and get very few choices. This leads to decrease in the welfare of the consumer as well as the entrant firm.

Whereas, the existing firm in the market gets benefited from the restrictive laws. This is because of higher price and less competition in the market.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Competition in a market:

It is a way by which the existing firm in the market tries to have dominance in the market with a larger market share. The way of dominance depends on the quality, restrictive laws, and the price of goods provided to the consumers.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Explain and evaluate the impact of legislation on the U.S. criminal justice system, specifically on the prison population and its impact on poverty and the U.S. economy. Include significant elements and limitations such as the War on Drugs and the First Step Act.

Given the following petroleum tax details, calculate the marginal tax rate and explain its significance: Total Revenue: $500 million Cost of Operations: $200 million Tax Rate: 40% Additional Royalty: 5% Profit-Based Tax: 10%

Use a game tree to illustrate why an aircraft manufacturer may price below the current marginal cost in the short run if it has a steep learning curve. (Hint: Show that learning by doing lowers its cost in the second period.) Part 2 Assume for simplicity the game tree is illustrated in the figure to the right. Pricing below marginal cost reduces profits but gives the incumbent a cost advantage over potential rivals. What is the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium?

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 19, Problem 1DQ

To determine

The difference between the two ways of beating competition.

Concept introduction:

Competition in a market:

It is a way by which the existing firm in the market tries to have dominance in the market with a larger market share. The way of dominance depends on the quality, restrictive laws, and the price of goods provided to the consumers.

Explanation:

Yes, there is a lot of difference between the two ways of beating competition. Where the first way is to provide good quality services at low price and the other way is to restrict the rival’s entry with laws.

When a firm decides to decrease the price of its good and improve the quality of services rendered to the customers then it benefits fully to the consumers. When a firm decreases the price of the product then the purchasing power of the customer increases. Their ability to get large quantity of goods at the same income level increases. This increases consumer welfare.

On the other hand, when a firm gets a law passed against the rival competitors then it harms the entrant as well as the consumers. The number of firms in the market decreases due to the restrictive laws. Hence, the consumer faces higher price and get very few choices. This leads to decrease in the welfare of the consumer as well as the entrant firm.

Whereas, the existing firm in the market gets benefited from the restrictive laws. This is because of higher price and less competition in the market.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Yes, there is a lot of difference between the two ways of beating competition. Where the first way is to provide good quality services at low price and the other way is to restrict the rival’s entry with laws.

When a firm decides to decrease the price of its good and improve the quality of services rendered to the customers then it benefits fully to the consumers. When a firm decreases the price of the product then the purchasing power of the customer increases. Their ability to get large quantity of goods at the same income level increases. This increases consumer welfare.

On the other hand, when a firm gets a law passed against the rival competitors then it harms the entrant as well as the consumers. The number of firms in the market decreases due to the restrictive laws. Hence, the consumer faces higher price and get very few choices. This leads to decrease in the welfare of the consumer as well as the entrant firm.

Whereas, the existing firm in the market gets benefited from the restrictive laws. This is because of higher price and less competition in the market.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Competition in a market:

It is a way by which the existing firm in the market tries to have dominance in the market with a larger market share. The way of dominance depends on the quality, restrictive laws, and the price of goods provided to the consumers.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 19, Problem 1DQ

To determine

The difference between the two ways of beating competition.

Concept introduction:

Competition in a market:

It is a way by which the existing firm in the market tries to have dominance in the market with a larger market share. The way of dominance depends on the quality, restrictive laws, and the price of goods provided to the consumers.

Explanation:

Yes, there is a lot of difference between the two ways of beating competition. Where the first way is to provide good quality services at low price and the other way is to restrict the rival’s entry with laws.

When a firm decides to decrease the price of its good and improve the quality of services rendered to the customers then it benefits fully to the consumers. When a firm decreases the price of the product then the purchasing power of the customer increases. Their ability to get large quantity of goods at the same income level increases. This increases consumer welfare.

On the other hand, when a firm gets a law passed against the rival competitors then it harms the entrant as well as the consumers. The number of firms in the market decreases due to the restrictive laws. Hence, the consumer faces higher price and get very few choices. This leads to decrease in the welfare of the consumer as well as the entrant firm.

Whereas, the existing firm in the market gets benefited from the restrictive laws. This is because of higher price and less competition in the market.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Yes, there is a lot of difference between the two ways of beating competition. Where the first way is to provide good quality services at low price and the other way is to restrict the rival’s entry with laws.

When a firm decides to decrease the price of its good and improve the quality of services rendered to the customers then it benefits fully to the consumers. When a firm decreases the price of the product then the purchasing power of the customer increases. Their ability to get large quantity of goods at the same income level increases. This increases consumer welfare.

On the other hand, when a firm gets a law passed against the rival competitors then it harms the entrant as well as the consumers. The number of firms in the market decreases due to the restrictive laws. Hence, the consumer faces higher price and get very few choices. This leads to decrease in the welfare of the consumer as well as the entrant firm.

Whereas, the existing firm in the market gets benefited from the restrictive laws. This is because of higher price and less competition in the market.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Competition in a market:

It is a way by which the existing firm in the market tries to have dominance in the market with a larger market share. The way of dominance depends on the quality, restrictive laws, and the price of goods provided to the consumers.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 19, Problem 1DQ

To determine

The difference between the two ways of beating competition.

Concept introduction:

Competition in a market:

It is a way by which the existing firm in the market tries to have dominance in the market with a larger market share. The way of dominance depends on the quality, restrictive laws, and the price of goods provided to the consumers.

Explanation:

Yes, there is a lot of difference between the two ways of beating competition. Where the first way is to provide good quality services at low price and the other way is to restrict the rival’s entry with laws.

When a firm decides to decrease the price of its good and improve the quality of services rendered to the customers then it benefits fully to the consumers. When a firm decreases the price of the product then the purchasing power of the customer increases. Their ability to get large quantity of goods at the same income level increases. This increases consumer welfare.

On the other hand, when a firm gets a law passed against the rival competitors then it harms the entrant as well as the consumers. The number of firms in the market decreases due to the restrictive laws. Hence, the consumer faces higher price and get very few choices. This leads to decrease in the welfare of the consumer as well as the entrant firm.

Whereas, the existing firm in the market gets benefited from the restrictive laws. This is because of higher price and less competition in the market.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Yes, there is a lot of difference between the two ways of beating competition. Where the first way is to provide good quality services at low price and the other way is to restrict the rival’s entry with laws.

When a firm decides to decrease the price of its good and improve the quality of services rendered to the customers then it benefits fully to the consumers. When a firm decreases the price of the product then the purchasing power of the customer increases. Their ability to get large quantity of goods at the same income level increases. This increases consumer welfare.

On the other hand, when a firm gets a law passed against the rival competitors then it harms the entrant as well as the consumers. The number of firms in the market decreases due to the restrictive laws. Hence, the consumer faces higher price and get very few choices. This leads to decrease in the welfare of the consumer as well as the entrant firm.

Whereas, the existing firm in the market gets benefited from the restrictive laws. This is because of higher price and less competition in the market.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Competition in a market:

It is a way by which the existing firm in the market tries to have dominance in the market with a larger market share. The way of dominance depends on the quality, restrictive laws, and the price of goods provided to the consumers.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 19, Problem 1DQ

To determine

The difference between the two ways of beating competition.

Concept introduction:

Competition in a market:

It is a way by which the existing firm in the market tries to have dominance in the market with a larger market share. The way of dominance depends on the quality, restrictive laws, and the price of goods provided to the consumers.

Explanation:

Yes, there is a lot of difference between the two ways of beating competition. Where the first way is to provide good quality services at low price and the other way is to restrict the rival’s entry with laws.

When a firm decides to decrease the price of its good and improve the quality of services rendered to the customers then it benefits fully to the consumers. When a firm decreases the price of the product then the purchasing power of the customer increases. Their ability to get large quantity of goods at the same income level increases. This increases consumer welfare.

On the other hand, when a firm gets a law passed against the rival competitors then it harms the entrant as well as the consumers. The number of firms in the market decreases due to the restrictive laws. Hence, the consumer faces higher price and get very few choices. This leads to decrease in the welfare of the consumer as well as the entrant firm.

Whereas, the existing firm in the market gets benefited from the restrictive laws. This is because of higher price and less competition in the market.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Yes, there is a lot of difference between the two ways of beating competition. Where the first way is to provide good quality services at low price and the other way is to restrict the rival’s entry with laws.

When a firm decides to decrease the price of its good and improve the quality of services rendered to the customers then it benefits fully to the consumers. When a firm decreases the price of the product then the purchasing power of the customer increases. Their ability to get large quantity of goods at the same income level increases. This increases consumer welfare.

On the other hand, when a firm gets a law passed against the rival competitors then it harms the entrant as well as the consumers. The number of firms in the market decreases due to the restrictive laws. Hence, the consumer faces higher price and get very few choices. This leads to decrease in the welfare of the consumer as well as the entrant firm.

Whereas, the existing firm in the market gets benefited from the restrictive laws. This is because of higher price and less competition in the market.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Competition in a market:

It is a way by which the existing firm in the market tries to have dominance in the market with a larger market share. The way of dominance depends on the quality, restrictive laws, and the price of goods provided to the consumers.

Answer 6

Chapter 19, Problem 1DQ

To determine

The difference between the two ways of beating competition.

Concept introduction:

Competition in a market:

It is a way by which the existing firm in the market tries to have dominance in the market with a larger market share. The way of dominance depends on the quality, restrictive laws, and the price of goods provided to the consumers.

Explanation:

Yes, there is a lot of difference between the two ways of beating competition. Where the first way is to provide good quality services at low price and the other way is to restrict the rival’s entry with laws.

When a firm decides to decrease the price of its good and improve the quality of services rendered to the customers then it benefits fully to the consumers. When a firm decreases the price of the product then the purchasing power of the customer increases. Their ability to get large quantity of goods at the same income level increases. This increases consumer welfare.

On the other hand, when a firm gets a law passed against the rival competitors then it harms the entrant as well as the consumers. The number of firms in the market decreases due to the restrictive laws. Hence, the consumer faces higher price and get very few choices. This leads to decrease in the welfare of the consumer as well as the entrant firm.

Whereas, the existing firm in the market gets benefited from the restrictive laws. This is because of higher price and less competition in the market.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Yes, there is a lot of difference between the two ways of beating competition. Where the first way is to provide good quality services at low price and the other way is to restrict the rival’s entry with laws.

When a firm decides to decrease the price of its good and improve the quality of services rendered to the customers then it benefits fully to the consumers. When a firm decreases the price of the product then the purchasing power of the customer increases. Their ability to get large quantity of goods at the same income level increases. This increases consumer welfare.

On the other hand, when a firm gets a law passed against the rival competitors then it harms the entrant as well as the consumers. The number of firms in the market decreases due to the restrictive laws. Hence, the consumer faces higher price and get very few choices. This leads to decrease in the welfare of the consumer as well as the entrant firm.

Whereas, the existing firm in the market gets benefited from the restrictive laws. This is because of higher price and less competition in the market.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Competition in a market:

It is a way by which the existing firm in the market tries to have dominance in the market with a larger market share. The way of dominance depends on the quality, restrictive laws, and the price of goods provided to the consumers.

Answer 7

Chapter 19, Problem 1DQ

To determine

The difference between the two ways of beating competition.

Concept introduction:

Competition in a market:

It is a way by which the existing firm in the market tries to have dominance in the market with a larger market share. The way of dominance depends on the quality, restrictive laws, and the price of goods provided to the consumers.

Explanation:

Yes, there is a lot of difference between the two ways of beating competition. Where the first way is to provide good quality services at low price and the other way is to restrict the rival’s entry with laws.

When a firm decides to decrease the price of its good and improve the quality of services rendered to the customers then it benefits fully to the consumers. When a firm decreases the price of the product then the purchasing power of the customer increases. Their ability to get large quantity of goods at the same income level increases. This increases consumer welfare.

On the other hand, when a firm gets a law passed against the rival competitors then it harms the entrant as well as the consumers. The number of firms in the market decreases due to the restrictive laws. Hence, the consumer faces higher price and get very few choices. This leads to decrease in the welfare of the consumer as well as the entrant firm.

Whereas, the existing firm in the market gets benefited from the restrictive laws. This is because of higher price and less competition in the market.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Yes, there is a lot of difference between the two ways of beating competition. Where the first way is to provide good quality services at low price and the other way is to restrict the rival’s entry with laws.

When a firm decides to decrease the price of its good and improve the quality of services rendered to the customers then it benefits fully to the consumers. When a firm decreases the price of the product then the purchasing power of the customer increases. Their ability to get large quantity of goods at the same income level increases. This increases consumer welfare.

On the other hand, when a firm gets a law passed against the rival competitors then it harms the entrant as well as the consumers. The number of firms in the market decreases due to the restrictive laws. Hence, the consumer faces higher price and get very few choices. This leads to decrease in the welfare of the consumer as well as the entrant firm.

Whereas, the existing firm in the market gets benefited from the restrictive laws. This is because of higher price and less competition in the market.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Competition in a market:

It is a way by which the existing firm in the market tries to have dominance in the market with a larger market share. The way of dominance depends on the quality, restrictive laws, and the price of goods provided to the consumers.

Answer 12

Ch. 19 - Prob. 1DQ Ch. 19 - Prob. 2DQ Ch. 19 - Prob. 3DQ Ch. 19 - Prob. 4DQ Ch. 19 - Prob. 5DQ Ch. 19 - Prob. 6DQ

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 19 Solutions