1.
To compute: Company’s income under absorption costing.
a.
1.

Explanation of Solution
Income statement under absorption costing when 300 workstations are produced is,
S.R. Company Income Statement (Absorption Costing) For the year ended 2018 | ||||
Particulars | Amount ($) | Amount($) | ||
Sales | 900,000 | |||
Cost of Goods sold (working note) | (414,000) | |||
Gross Margin | 486,000 | |||
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost | (15,000) | |||
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost | (4,000) | (19,000) | ||
Net Income | 467,000 | |||
Table (1) |
The net income under absorption costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.
Working note:
Calculation of cost of goods sold is,
Where, the cost per unit can be calculated as,
Particulars | Amount ($) Per Unit | |||
Direct Materials | 800 | |||
Direct Labor | 400 | |||
Variable | 100 | |||
Fixed Overheads | 80 | |||
Total Cost Per Unit | 1,380 | |||
Table (2) |
Substitute 300 for the number of units and $1,380 for the cost per unit in the above formula.
Thus, the net income under absorption costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.
b.
Solution:
Income statement under absorption costing when 320 workstations are produced is,
S.R. Company Income Statement (Absorption Costing) For the year ended 2018 | ||||
Particulars | Amount ($) | Amount($) | ||
Sales | 900,000 | |||
Cost of Goods sold (working note) | (412,500) | |||
Gross Margin | 487,500 | |||
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost | (15,000) | |||
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost | (4,000) | (19,000) | ||
Net Income | 468,500 | |||
Table (3) |
The net income under absorption costing at 320 units of production is $468,500.
Working note:
Calculation of cost of goods sold is,
Where, the cost per unit can be calculated as,
Particulars | Amount ($) Per Unit | |||
Direct Materials | 800 | |||
Direct Labor | 400 | |||
Variable Overheads | 100 | |||
Fixed Overheads | 75 | |||
Total Cost Per Unit | 1,375 | |||
Table (4) |
Substitute 300 for the number of units and $1,375 for the cost per unit in the above formula.
Thus, the net income under absorption costing at 320 units of production is $468,500.
2.
To compute: Company’s income under variable costing.
a.
2.

Explanation of Solution
Income statement under variable costing when 300 workstations are produced is,
S.R. Company Income Statement (Variable Costing) For the year ended 2018 | ||||
Particulars | Amount ($) | Amount($) | ||
Sales | 900,000 | |||
Direct Materials | (240,000) | |||
Direct Labor | (120,000) | |||
Variable production Overhead | (30,000) | |||
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost | (15,000) | (405,000) | ||
Contribution Margin | 495,000 | |||
Fixed Production Overhead | (24000) | |||
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost | (4,000) | (28,000) | ||
Net Income | 467,000 | |||
Table (5) |
Thus, the net income under variable costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.
b.
Solution:
Income statement under variable costing when 320 workstations are produced is,
S.R. Company Income Statement (Variable Costing) For the year ended 2018 | ||||
Particulars | Amount ($) | Amount($) | ||
Sales | 900,000 | |||
Direct Materials | (240,000) | |||
Direct Labor | (120,000) | |||
Variable production Overhead | (30,000) | |||
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost | (15,000) | (405,000) | ||
Contribution Margin | 495,000 | |||
Fixed Production Overhead | (24000) | |||
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost | (4,000) | (28,000) | ||
Net Income | 467,000 | |||
Table (6) |
Thus, the net income under variable costing at 320 units of production is $467,000.
3.
To explain: The difference in income figures determined in part 1 and part 2 and the way the company should use the information from part 1 and part 2 to make production decision.
3.

Explanation of Solution
- The income statement prepared under variable costing includes the costing of a product on only direct or variable cost, so, the valuation of the ending inventory is done only on variable cost and not on the fixed cost.
- The income statement prepared under absorption costing includes the costing of a product on both fixed and variable costs, so, the valuation of the ending inventory is done on both the cost that is fixed and variable.
- The difference in the value of the closing inventory creates the difference in the incomes under the absorption and variable method.
- When the value of closing inventory becomes zero or same under both methods, the difference between their incomes becomes zero. So, the difference in income between the variable costing and absorption costing is due to the difference in the value of closing inventory under both the methods.
- From the calculation above in part 1 and 2 it can be seen that the income is greater when the company produces 320 units and uses the absorption costing, so, the company should take the income as the measure to take decision regarding production.
Thus, the difference in income between the variable costing and absorption costing is due to the difference in the value of closing inventory under both the methods and the company can take the production decision by looking at the income figures under the two methods.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 19 Solutions
GEN CMB FINCL MGRL ACCT CNCT >BI<
- What is the gross margin for the first year?arrow_forwardThe Natasha Manufacturing's cost of goods manufactured was $185,000 when its sales were $420,000 and its gross margin was $195,000. If the ending inventory of finished goods was $48,000, the beginning inventory of finished goods must have been__.arrow_forwardHelp me with thisarrow_forward
- Please provide the accurate answer to this general accounting problem using valid techniques.arrow_forwardThe company estimates that the production and sale of the new product to be produced by this new machinery will increase net income by $15,000 a year.arrow_forwardCalculate the COGSarrow_forward
- I am searching for a clear explanation of this financial accounting problem with valid methods.arrow_forwardSolve this financial accounting problemarrow_forwardThe storekeeper at Charles Resort conducted the monthly cleaning supply inventory. Records showed an opening balance of 720 units, with deliveries of 310 units and consumption recorded at 650 units during the month. Physical verification found 365 units in stock. The operations manager requested the quantity variance report.arrow_forward
- AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337272094Author:WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Accounting Information SystemsAccountingISBN:9781337619202Author:Hall, James A.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
- Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis...AccountingISBN:9780134475585Author:Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. RajanPublisher:PEARSONIntermediate AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259722660Author:J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M ThomasPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationFinancial and Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259726705Author:John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting PrinciplesPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





