Concept explainers
(1)
Predetermined factory
Normally,
To Calculate: The predetermined factory overhead rate for each alternative base for M Industries.
(1)
Answer to Problem 19.5CP
The predetermined overhead rate for alternative activity base is prepared as follows:
Direct labor cost:
Machine hours:
Working notes:
Total overhead for (2012 – 2016) is calculated as follows:
Factory Overhead (Actual) | Amount ($) |
2012 | 790,000 |
2013 | 870,000 |
2014 | 935,000 |
2015 | 845,000 |
2016 | 760,000 |
4,200,000 |
Table (1)
Total direct labor cost, (2012 – 2016) is computed as below:
Direct labor cost | Amount ($) |
2012 | 3,885,000 |
2013 | 4,410,000 |
2014 | 4,620,000 |
2015 | 4,200,000 |
2016 | 3,885,000 |
21,000,000 |
Table (2)
Total machine hours, (2012 – 2016) is computed as follows:
Machine hours | Hours |
2012 | 93,000 |
2013 | 104,000 |
2014 | 111,000 |
2015 | 100,400 |
2016 | 91,600 |
500,000 |
Table (3)
Explanation of Solution
The total factory overhead is calculated by totaling all year’s actual overhead incurred in production. There are two activity bases. One is direct labor cost and another is machine hours. The total direct labor cost is determined by adding all year’s direct labor cost incurred. The total machine hours spent is determined by adding all year’s machine hours.
The predetermined overhead rate for direct labor cost is 20% of direct labor cost and predetermined overhead rate for machine hours is$8.40 per machine hour.
(2)
The over- or under applied overhead based on two predetermined overhead rates.
(2)
Answer to Problem 19.5CP
Actual Overhead ($) | Applied Overhead ($) | (Over-) underapplied ($) | ||
(a) | (b) | (c) = (a) – (b) | ||
2016 | Direct Labor cost | 790,000 | 777,000 (1) | 13,000 |
Machine Hours | 790,000 | 781,200 (6) | 8,800 | |
2015 | Direct Labor cost | 870,000 | 882,000 (2) | (12,000) |
Machine Hours | 870,000 | 873,600 (7) | (3,600) | |
2014 | Direct Labor cost | 935,000 | 924,000 (3) | 11,000 |
Machine Hours | 935,000 | 932,400 (8) | 2,600 | |
2013 | Direct Labor cost | 845,000 | 840,000 (4) | 5,000 |
Machine Hours | 845,000 | 843,360 (9) | 1,640 | |
2012 | Direct Labor cost | 760,000 | 777,000 (5) | (17,000) |
Machine Hours | 760,000 | 769,440 (10) | (9,440) |
Table (4)
Working note:
The applied overhead for direct labor activity base is calculated as follows:
The applied overhead for machine hour’s activity base is calculated as follows:
Explanation of Solution
When actual overhead incurred is less than applied overhead, the overhead is said to be overapplied. Alternatively, when actual overhead incurred is greater than applied overhead, the overhead is said to be under applied.
(3)
To Discuss: In applying the best predetermined overhead rate as computed.
(3)
Explanation of Solution
The best predetermined overhead rate is machine hours. The total overhead applied is based on both machine hours and direct labor cost. The over- or underapplied overhead ranges from $9,440 (Overapplied) to $8,800 (Underapplied) when the rates are based on machine hours. The over- or underapplied overhead ranges from $17,000 (Overapplied) to $13,000 (Underapplied) when the rates are based on machine hours.
When comparing both, we could see less fluctuation in under or over applied overhead based on predetermined overhead rate based on machine hours in the year by year basis.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 19 Solutions
Bundle: Accounting, Chapters 1-13, 26th + Working Papers, Chapters 1-17 For Warren/reeve/duchac's Accounting, 26th And Financial Accounting, 14th + ... For Warren/reeve/duchac's Accounting, 26th
- Which of the following is not a reason to allocate overhead? Some overhead costs are seasonal and should be spread over production for the entire year. Unlike direct materials and direct labor, the amount of overhead actually incurred may not be known at the time a job is being worked on. Allocation is more accurate than tracing items directly to jobs. Manufacturing overhead is an indirect cost that cannot be physically or economically traced back to a specific item.arrow_forwardA company uses job-order costing with manufacturing overhead (MOH) applied on the basis of machine hours (MHs). In the past, the company's pre-determined overhead rate (POHR) has fluctuated from period to period due primarily to differences in the expected usage of their machine. For this period, the machine has a capacity of 450 MHs, but based on anticipated production, only 375 MHs are expected to be required. The company's MOH is relatively fixed, estimated at $11,250 for both levels of MHs. At the end of the period, actual production used 413 MHs and total actual MOH amounted to $10.500. 1. How much less MOH would be applied during the month using capacity MHs rather than the traditional method?arrow_forwardA company uses job-order costing with manufacturing overhead (MOH) applied on the basis of machine hours (MHS). In the past, the company's pre- determined overhead rate (POHR) has fluctuated from period to period due primarily to differences in the expected usage of their machine. For this period, the machine has a capacity of 450 MHs, but based on anticipated production, only 375 MHs are expected to be required. The company's MOH is relatively fixed, estimated at $11,250 for both levels of MHs. At the end of the period, actual production used 386 MHs and total actual MOH amounted to $10,500. How much less MOH would be applied during the month using capacity MHs rather than the traditional method? Multiple Choice $772 less applied to MOH using capacity. None of the answers are correct $1358 less applied to MOH using capacity. $1,930 less applied to MOH using capacity $1,544 less applied to MOH using capacityarrow_forward
- (Appendix 3A) Method of Least Squares Farnsworth Company has gathered data on its overhead activities and associated costs for the past 10 months. Tracy Heppler, a member of the controller's department, has convinced management that overhead costs can be better estimated and controlled if the fixed and variable components of each overhead activity are known. One such activity is receiving raw materials (unloading incoming goods, counting goods, and inspecting goods), which she believes is driven by the number of receiving orders. Ten months of data have been gathered for the receiving activity and are as follows: Month Receiving Orders Receiving Cost 1 1,000 $18,000 2 700 15,000 3 1,500 28,000 4 1,200 17,000 5 1,300 25,000 6 1,100 21,000 7 1,600 29,000 8 1,400 24,000 9 1,700 27,000 10 900 16,000 Suppose that Tracy has gathered two more months of data: Month Receiving Orders Receiving Cost…arrow_forwardNote:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardABC Company’s existing costing system allocates all machine-related overhead based on machine hours and all the remaining overhead based on direct labor hours. However, a recent study determined that machine set-up costs and material handling costs are primarily related to the number of setups performed and other materials-related costs are primarily related to the number of purchase orders issued. The Company does not keep significant materials inventories on hand. Selected information follows for the company’s most recent year of operations: Indirect Costs: Machine related: Machine operation P 65,000 Machine setup P 27,000 Materials related: Materials Handling P 30,000 Other materials related P 35,000 Other overhead costs P 215,000 Machine hours 4,000 Pounds of materials 25,000 Setups 1,000 Purchase orders 700 Direct labor hours 20,000 Required: Calculate the two overhead rates in the…arrow_forward
- Amberjack Company is trying to decide on an allocation base to use to assign manufacturing overhead to jobs. The company has always used direct labor hours to assign manufacturing overhead to products, but it is trying to decide whether it should use a different allocation base such as direct labor dollars or machine hours. Actual and estimated data for manufacturing overhead, direct labor cost, direct labor hours, and machine hours for the most recent fiscal year are summarized here: Estimated Value Actual Value Manufacturing overhead cost $ 597,000 $ 658,000 Direct labor cost $ 399,000 $ 453,000 Direct labor hours 16,800 hours 18,300 hours Machine hours 7,800 hours 8,800 hours Required: Based on the company’s current allocation base (direct labor hours), compute the following:Predetermined overhead rate. Note: Round your answer to 2 decimal places. Applied manufacturing overhead. Note: Round your intermediate calculations to 2 decimal places and final answer…arrow_forwardCost Classification and Behaviour—Spark Electrical Company Spark Electrical Company manufactures electrical components. Plant management has experienced difficulties with fluctuating monthly overhead costs. Management wants to be able to estimate overhead costs to plan its operations and financial needs. A trade association publication reports that for companies manufacturing electrical components, overhead tends to vary with machine hours. Monthly data was gathered on machine hours and overhead costs for the past two years. There were no major changes in operations over this period of time. The raw data is: Month Number Machine Hours Overhead Costs ($) 1 20,000 84,000 2 25,000 99,000 3 22,000 89,500 4 23,000 90,000 5 20,000 81,500 6 19,000 75,500 7 14,000 70,500 8 10,000 64,500 9 12,000 69,000 10 17,000 75,000 11 16,000 71,500 12 19,000 78,000 13 21,000 86,000 14 24,000 93,000 15 23,000 93,000 16 22,000 87,000 17 20,000 80,000…arrow_forwardPlease I want to learn how to make this problem with a good explanation. One of those there is the possible answer. Thank youarrow_forward
- Carver Company uses a plantwide overhead rate based on direct labor costs. Suppose that Carver raises its wage rate for direct labor during the year. How would that affect the overhead applied? The total cost of jobs?arrow_forwardThe management of Garn Corporation would like to investigate the possibility of basing its predetermined overhead rate on activity at capacity rather than on the estimated activity for the coming year. The Corporation's controller has provided an example to illustrate how this new system would work. In this example, the allocation base is machine-hours and the estimated activity for the upcoming year is 59,400 machine-hours. Capacity is 78,400 machine-hours. All of the manufacturing overhead is fixed and is $3,136,000 per year within the range of 59,400 to 78,400 machine-hours. If the Corporation bases its predetermined overhead rate on capacity but the actual level of activity for the year turns out to be 59,900 machine-hours, the cost of unused capacity shown on the income statement prepared for internal management purposes would be closest to: Multiple Choice $26.177 $766,177 $740,000 $26,397arrow_forward9 Patterson, Inc. uses job-order costing with manufacturing overhead (MOH) applied on the basis of machine hours (MHS). In the past, the company's pre-determined overhead rate (POHR) has fluctuated from period to period due primarily to differences in expected usage of their machine. For the coming month, the controller would like to investigate using capacity in determining the application of overhead to jobs. For the period, the machine can operate at a capacity of 320 MHs, however, based on expected production, it is estimated that only 290 MHs will be required. MOH is relatively fixed for the company and is estimated to be $11,600 at both of these levels of MHs. At the end of the period, the controller found that production used 292 MHs and actual MOH totaled $11,745. How much less MOH would be applied during the month using capacity MHs rather than the traditional method? A. S 1.241.00 less applied to MOH using capacity. B. S 1,087.50 less applied to MOH using capacity. 4 C. D. E.…arrow_forward
- Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337912020Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. TaylerPublisher:South-Western College PubCornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Cost AccountingAccountingISBN:9781305087408Author:Edward J. Vanderbeck, Maria R. MitchellPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Financial And Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337902663Author:WARREN, Carl S.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Principles of Accounting Volume 2AccountingISBN:9781947172609Author:OpenStaxPublisher:OpenStax CollegeSurvey of Accounting (Accounting I)AccountingISBN:9781305961883Author:Carl WarrenPublisher:Cengage Learning