Bundle: Microeconomics, 13th + Aplia, 1 Term Printed Access Card
13th Edition
ISBN: 9781337742535
Author: Roger A. Arnold
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 18, Problem 3WNG
To determine
Probability of winning in election.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Consider the race for governor of a small state. The population of the state is evenly divided between three cities-Riverville, Hanover, and Danbury.
The governor's race is between Ron Ruskin (the mayor of Riverville) and Ted Topple (the mayor of Hanover). Assume that no matter what is said
during the campaign, Ruskin can count on the support of 100% of the Riverville population, and Topple can count on the support of 100% of the
Hanover population. Assume 100% voter participation.
According to the result of majority-rule voting, the next governor will be the one preferred by the majority of the residents of
The two candidates are asked in a debate about their support of recreational subsidies. Public opinion polls in the city you just identified have shown
the following about the level of recreational subsidies desired:
• 70% want a low level
20% want a medium level
• 10% want a high level
Assuming that voters prefer outcomes closer to their preferred choices to outcomes further away,…
Arrow's impossibility theorem states that under certain assumptions about preferences, no voting system exists that satisfies all of the following properties:
•
Unanimity
•
Transitivity
•
Independence of irrelevant alternatives
•
No dictators
Please help me with this question ASAP
Chapter 18 Solutions
Bundle: Microeconomics, 13th + Aplia, 1 Term Printed Access Card
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- In a congressional district somewhere in the U.S., a new representative is being elected. The voters all have one-dimensional political views that can be neatly arrayed on a left-right spectrum. We can define the ”location” of a citizen’s political views in the following way. The citizen with the most extreme left-wing views is said to be at point 0 and the citizen with the most extreme right-wing views is said to be at point 1. If a citizen has views that are to the right of the views of the fraction x of the state’s population, that citizen’s views are said to be located at point x. There are two candidates for the congressional seat and they are forced to publicly state their own political position simultaneously on the zero-one left-right scale. 1.a Suppose voters always vote for the candidate whose stated position is nearest to their own views and suppose each candidate cares only about getting as many votes as possible. In equilibrium, what will be the two candidates’ positions?…arrow_forwardConsider two political candidates A and B facing an electorate with ideological positions uniformly distributed between 0 and 1. (To remind you, uniformly distributed means there are equal numbers of voters in the interval between 0.4 and 0.6 as between 0.8 and 1.0 and any interval of the same length.) Candidates want to maximize their vote shares. Each simultaneously and independently of the other announces a position between O and 1. A voter chooses to vote for a candidate who is closest to her but will abstain rather than vote for a candidate whose announced position is more than 0.20 distance away. Is there a Nash equilibrium in pure strategies? Explain your answer.arrow_forwardAll of the following statements are true about median voter theory, except: Select the correct answer below: The median voter is in the middle of the political spectrum. The effects of the U.S. sugar lobby supports median voter theory. Median voter theory suggests that if a candidate needs more than 50% to win an election, the best way to win is to have median preferences. The median voter theory argues that politicians will try to match policies to what pleases the median voter preferences.arrow_forward
- Give both answers I give you thumparrow_forwardwith largest remall 6. In Table 13.15, we again show the same results from the Oslo district in the 2005 Norwegian elections. Answer the following questions. As before, you should ignore the "others" category. a. Copy Table 13.15. Imagine that the seventeen seats in Oslo are to be allocated according to the d'Hondt divisor method. Show the different quotients that are calculated when you divide each party's vote total by the d'Hondt divisors in your table. How many seats does each party obtain? b. Now repeat the process using the Sainte-Laguë divisor method and then the modified Sainte-Laguë divisor method. Note that you will need to change the integers used to estimate the quotients. How many seats does each party obtain under these divisor systems? c. Are there any differences if you examine the seat allocations from the two quota systems and the three divisor systems? Does one method produce a more proportional or fairer outcome in your opinion than another? TABLE 13.15 Legislative…arrow_forwardThe following table shows how three voters ranked Policy A, Policy B, and Policy C. Which policy is preferred by the majority? Voter 1 Voter 2 Voter 3 Policy A Policy B Policy C First Choice Policy B Policy C Policy A Policy C Policy A Policy B Second Choice Third Choice Select the correct answer below: O Policy B O Policy C one policy is not preferred by the majority O Policy Aarrow_forward
- in a voting, When a state does not win a representative to another state, though its population is increasing at a quicker rate than that of the other state. what type of paradox is thatarrow_forwardPolitical Economy Assume there are three voters: A, B and C. Voter preferences can be ranked along a left-to-right spectrum that ranges from 1-9; 1 being the most left leaning preference and 9 being the most right leaning preference. Suppose these voters will choose between candidates Smith and Jones in an upcoming election. Voter Id Preference(1-9) A 4 B 5 C 6 True/False Explain: If the median voter theorem holds, candidates Smith and Jones will either both adopt preference 5 OR one will adopt preference 4 while the other adopts preference 6. Suppose the electorate becomes more polarized; A moves from 4 to 1 while C moves from 6 to 9. B remains at 5. How does the median voter model predict candidates Smith and Jones will change their preference? Keeping the assumptions from B, how does the election result change if a tax on non-voters doubles the number of voters while preserving the distribution of preferences? If the tax in C induces 100%…arrow_forwardPolitical Economy Assume there are three voters: A, B and C. Voter preferences can be ranked along a left-to-right spectrum that ranges from 1-9; 1 being the most left leaning preference and 9 being the most right leaning preference. Suppose these voters will choose between candidates Smith and Jones in an upcoming election. Voter Id Preference(1-9) A 4 B 5 C 6 True/False Explain: If the median voter theorem holds, candidates Smith and Jones will either both adopt preference 5 OR one will adopt preference 4 while the other adopts preference 6. Suppose the electorate becomes more polarized; A moves from 4 to 1 while C moves from 6 to 9. B remains at 5. How does the median voter model predict candidates Smith and Jones will change their preference? Keeping the assumptions from B, how does the election result change if a tax on non-voters doubles the number of voters while preserving the distribution of preferences? If the tax in C induces 100%…arrow_forward
- Political Economy Assume there are three voters: A, B and C. Voter preferences can be ranked along a left-to-right spectrum that ranges from 1-9; 1 being the most left leaning preference and 9 being the most right leaning preference. Suppose these voters will choose between candidates Smith and Jones in an upcoming election. Voter Id Preference(1-9) A 4 B 5 C 6 True/False Explain: If the median voter theorem holds, candidates Smith and Jones will either both adopt preference 5 OR one will adopt preference 4 while the other adopts preference 6. B) Suppose the electorate becomes more polarized; A moves from 4 to 1 while C moves from 6 to 9. B remains at 5. How does the median voter model predict candidates Smith and Jones will change their preference? C) Keeping the assumptions from B, how does the election result change if a tax on non-voters doubles the number of voters while preserving the distribution of preferences? D) If the tax in C induces…arrow_forwardLet's walk through the median voter theorem in a little more detail. Consider a town with three voters, Enrique, Nandini, and Torsten. The big issue in the upcoming election is how high the sales tax rate should be. As you'll learn in macroeconomics (and in real life), on average, a government that wants to do more spending has to bring in more taxes, so "higher permanent taxes" is the same as "higher government spending." Enrique wants low taxes and small government, Nandini is in the middle, and Torsten wants the biggest town government of the three. Each one is a stubborn person, and his or her favorite position-what economic theorists call the "ideal point-never changes in this problem. Their preferences can be summed up like this, with the x denoting each person's favorite tax rate: Enrique 0% N O Sales tax rate Nandini P Torsten 20% Suppose there are two politicians running for office, N and O (so ignore P for now). Enrique will vote for Choose your answer. Nandini will vote for…arrow_forwardSuppose that friends Jennifer, Stephanie, and Megan cannot agree on how much to spend for a bouquet of flowers to send to a person who allowed them to use her beach house for the weekend. Jennifer wants to buy a moderately priced bouquet, Stephanie wants to buy an expensive bouquet, and Megan wants to buy a very expensive bouquet. Assuming no paradox of voting, majority voting will result in the decision to buy Multiple Choice an inexpensive bouquet. a very expensive bouquet. a moderately priced bouquet. an expensive bouquet. Barrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506756Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506893
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506756
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506725
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning