Case summary:
There were times when a person gets a decent job, he sticks to that job and all his worries about retirement planning flies away because he gets regular pension from his employer and the funds accumulated by him in the social security schemes on a regular basis. The payments he receives in the form of pension are enough for him to live his post-retirement life comfortably.
M is a salesperson of a computer company and T is an accountant of a lighting manufacturer. They both have started their jobs simultaneously at the age of 25. Currently, M has started saving for his future and is investing a sum of $300 at 9% interest rate until the age of 65 but T has not started it yet and has reached the age of 35. She started to save for his future requirement and her net savings until her age of 65 stood at $553,000 which is relatively much lower than the accumulated wealth of M which stood at $14 million.
LT is the owner and president of TE Company and tells the post retirement needs and the changes in the budget of a person after his retirement. She describes that some of the expenses like clothing for work and commuting expenses may reduce and other expenses such as insurance, travel and recreation might get increased after retirement.
Character in this case: M and T.
Adequate information:
M starts the job at the age of 25.
T starts the job at the age of 35.
Monthly saving of the M is $300.
Monthly saving of the T is $300.
M accumulation is $1.4million.
T accumulation is $553,000.
To identify:
the reason behind the accumulation of $1.4 million and $553,000 of M and T.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 18 Solutions
Loose Leaf for Personal Finance
- Consider a situation involving determining right and wrong. Do you believe utilitarianism provides a more objective viewpoint than moral rights in this context? Why or why not? How about when comparing utilitarianism to principles of justice? Share your thoughts. Reflect on this statement: "Every principle of distributive justice, whether that of the egalitarian, the capitalist, the socialist, the libertarian, or Rawls, in the end is illegitimately advocating some type of equality." Do you agree or disagree with this assertion? Why might someone claim this, and how would you respond?arrow_forwardI need help checking my spreadsheet. Q: Assume that Temp Force’s dividend is expected to experience supernormal growth of 73%from Year 0 to Year 1, 47% from Year 1 to Year 2, 32% from Year 2 to Year 3 and 21% from year3 to year 4. After Year 4, dividends will grow at a constant rate of 2.75%. What is the stock’sintrinsic value under these conditions? What are the expected dividend yield and capital gainsyield during the first year? What are the expected dividend yield and capital gains yield duringthe fifth year (from Year 4 to Year 5)?arrow_forwardwhat are the five components of case study design? Please help explain with examplesarrow_forward
- Commissions are usually charged when a right is exercised. a warrant is exercised. a right is sold. all of the above will have commissions A and B are correct, C is not correctarrow_forwardWhat is Exploratory Research Case Study? What is the main purpose of Exploratory Research?arrow_forwardplease help with how to solve this thank you.arrow_forward
- Question 25 Jasmine bought a house for $225 000. She already knows that for the first $200 000, the land transfer tax will cost $1650. Calculate the total land transfer tax. (2 marks) Land Transfer Tax Table Value of Property Rate On the first $30 000 0% On the next $60 000 0.5% (i.e., $30 001 to $90 000) On the next $60 000 1.0% (i.e., $90 001 to $150 000) On the next $50 000 1.5% (i.e., $150 001 to $200 000) On amounts in excess of $200 000 2.0% 22 5000–200 000. 10 825000 2.5000.00 2 x 25000 =8500 2 maarrow_forwardQuestion 25 Jasmine bought a house for $225 000. She already knows that for the first $200 000, the land transfer tax will cost $1650. Calculate the total land transfer tax. (2 marks) Land Transfer Tax Table Value of Property Rate On the first $30 000 0% On the next $60 000 0.5% (i.e., $30 001 to $90 000) On the next $60 000 1.0% (i.e., $90 001 to $150 000) On the next $50 000 1.5% (i.e., $150 001 to $200 000) On amounts in excess of $200 000 2.0% 225000–200 000 = 825000 25000.002 × 25000 1= 8500 16 50+ 500 2 marksarrow_forwardSuppose you deposit $1,000 today (t = 0) in a bank account that pays an interest rate of 7% per year. If you keep the account for 5 years before you withdraw all the money, how much will you be able to withdraw after 5 years? Calculate using formula. Calculate using year-by-year approach. Find the present value of a security that will pay $2,500 in 4 years. The opportunity cost (interest rate that you could earn from alternative investments) is 5%. Calculate using the formula. Calculate using year-by-year discounting approach. Solve for the unknown in each of the following: Present value Years Interest rate Future value $50,000 12 ? $152,184 $21,400 30 ? $575,000 $16,500 ? 14% $238,830 $21,400 ? 9% $213,000 Suppose you enter into a monthly deposit scheme with Chase, where you have your salary account. The bank will deduct $25 from your salary account every month and the first payment (deduction) will be made…arrow_forward
- Essentials Of InvestmentsFinanceISBN:9781260013924Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.Publisher:Mcgraw-hill Education,
- Foundations Of FinanceFinanceISBN:9780134897264Author:KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. WilliamPublisher:Pearson,Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou...FinanceISBN:9781337395250Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. HoustonPublisher:Cengage LearningCorporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i...FinanceISBN:9780077861759Author:Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan ProfessorPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education