Why was the nebular hypothesis never fully accepted by astronomers of the day?
The reason behind the astronomers not fully accepting the nebular hypothesis.
Answer to Problem 1RQ
The reason behind the astronomers not fully accepting the nebular hypothesis is the missing explanation for the angular momentum of the planets.
Explanation of Solution
The most widely believed theory of the formation and evolution of the solar system is the nebular hypothesis but it has a few setbacks.
One of the major problems that the theory faced involved the distribution of the angular momentum between the planets and the Sun. The theory could not explain the fact that 99% of the angular momentum is possessed by the planets.
James Clerk Maxwell, a Scottish scientist, also criticized the theory. He said that if this theory is correct then, “the Moon must necessarily have carried off water and air from the watery and aerial parts of the Earth and must have an atmosphere". However, this is not true.
The astronomers did not fully accept the theory because of its inadequacies and it urged them to discover a substitution for the theory.
Therefore, the reason behind the astronomers not fully accepting the nebular hypothesis is the missing explanation for the angular momentum of the planets.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 18 Solutions
Mindtap Astronomy, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card For Seeds/backman's Foundations Of Astronomy, 14th
- How Do We Know? Why must a scientific argument dealing with some aspect of nature take all of the known evidence into account?arrow_forwardIf the Orion Nebula is 8 pc in diameter and has a density of about 6.0 108 hydrogen atoms/m3, what is its total mass? (Notes: The volume of a sphere is 43r3; 1 pc = 3.1 1016 m; the mass of a hydrogen atom is 1.7 1027 kg.)arrow_forwardHow do we know? How does the scientific method give scientists a way to know about nature?arrow_forward
- Describe the solar nebula, and outline the sequence of events within the nebula that gave rise to the planetesimals.arrow_forwardDid hydrogen gas condense from the nebula as the nebula cooled? What about helium gas? How do you know?arrow_forwardAccording to the nebular theory, which planet is most likely to be gaseous rather than rocky?arrow_forward
- H5. A star with mass 1.05 M has a luminosity of 4.49 × 1026 W and effective temperature of 5700 K. It dims to 4.42 × 1026 W every 1.39 Earth days due to a transiting exoplanet. The duration of the transit reveals that the exoplanet orbits at a distance of 0.0617 AU. Based on this information, calculate the radius of the planet (expressed in Jupiter radii) and the minimum inclination of its orbit to our line of sight. Follow up observations of the star in part reveal that a spectral feature with a rest wavelength of 656 nm is redshifted by 1.41×10−3 nm with the same period as the observed transit. Assuming a circular orbit what can be inferred about the planet’s mass (expressed in Jupiter masses)?arrow_forwardNeed full detailed answer.arrow_forwardNeed full detailed answer.arrow_forward
- Foundations of Astronomy (MindTap Course List)PhysicsISBN:9781337399920Author:Michael A. Seeds, Dana BackmanPublisher:Cengage LearningStars and Galaxies (MindTap Course List)PhysicsISBN:9781337399944Author:Michael A. SeedsPublisher:Cengage Learning
- AstronomyPhysicsISBN:9781938168284Author:Andrew Fraknoi; David Morrison; Sidney C. WolffPublisher:OpenStaxStars and GalaxiesPhysicsISBN:9781305120785Author:Michael A. Seeds, Dana BackmanPublisher:Cengage Learning