
Reason for shift of the U.S. income distribution in last two decades.

Explanation of Solution
In recent decades(from 1980s onward), the share of income earning by the top fifth has increased, and the share earnings by the bottom fifth has declined. The richest fifth’s share of income increased from 43.7 percent in 19900= to 51.1 percent in 2014. The foremost contributor to the larger share of income earning by the highest group has been the growth of two-earner households in that top group.
Note that in the top quantile, almost three out of the four households have two or more than two working. A major contributor to the smallest share earned by the lowest group has been the growth of single parent household in the bottom group.
Because of significant reduction in the marginal tax rates (in 1990 and 1996), high-income people had no incentive to engage in avoidance of tax, so their reported income increased. This boosted the share of reported earned income by the richest 5 percent of the households.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 18 Solutions
Mindtap Economics, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card For Mceachern's Econ Micro 6
- Zbsbwhjw8272:shbwhahwh Zbsbwhjw8272:shbwhahwh Zbsbwhjw8272:shbwhahwhZbsbwhjw8272:shbwhahwhZbsbwhjw8272:shbwhahwharrow_forwardUse the Feynman technique throughout. Assume that you’re explaining the answer to someone who doesn’t know the topic at all:arrow_forwardUse the Feynman technique throughout. Assume that you’reexplaining the answer to someone who doesn’t know the topic at all: 4. Draw a Keynesian AD curve in P – Y space and list the shift factors that will shift theKeynesian AD curve upward and to the right. Draw a separate Classical AD curve in P – Yspace and list the shift factors that will shift the Classical AD curve upward and to the right.arrow_forward
- Use the Feynman technique throughout. Assume that you’re explaining the answer to someone who doesn’t know the topic at all: 10. What is the mechanism or process that allows the expenditure multiplier to “work” in theKeynesian Cross Model? Explain and show both mathematically and graphically. What isthe underpinning assumption for the process to transpire?arrow_forwardUse the Feynman technique throughout. Assume that you’re explaining the answer to someone who doesn’t know the topic at all: 15. How is the Keynesian expenditure multiplier implicit in the Keynesian version of the AD/ASmodel? Explain and show mathematically. (note: this is a tough one)arrow_forwardUse the Feynman technique throughout. Assume that you’re explaining the answer to someone who doesn’t know the topic at all: 13. What would happen to the net exports function in Europe and the US respectively if thedemand for dollars rises worldwide? Explain why.arrow_forward
- 20. Given the mathematical model below, solve for the expenditure multiplier for a) government spending, G; and b) for consumer taxes, T. (medium difficulty) Y=C+I+G C=Co+b(Y-T) 1 = 10 T=To+tY G = Go+gYarrow_forwardUse the Feynman technique throughout. Assume that you’re explaining the answer to someone who doesn’t know the topic at all: 11. What exactly is a rectangular hyperbola and what relevance is it to classical economics?arrow_forwardUse the Feynman technique throughout. Assume that you’re explaining the answer to someone who doesn’t know the topic at all: 9. Explain the difference between absolute and comparative advantage in a family setting, i.e.using parents and children. What can we glean from knowing about comparative andabsolute advantages?arrow_forward
- Use the Feynman technique throughout. Assume that you’re explaining the answer to someone who doesn’t know the topic at all: 18. Explain why most economists believe it is absolutely necessary to allow free trade in aneconomy. Why is it harmful (under most circumstances) to have tariffs and trade barriers?arrow_forwardUse the Feynman technique throughout. Assume that you’re explaining the answer to someone who doesn’t know the topic at all: 19. How does the multiplier work in theory? How would you interpret Robert Barro’s empiricalfindings of a multiplier (note, not the MPC) of 0.8? What about Christine Romar’s finding ofa multiplier of 1.5?arrow_forwardUse the Feynman technique throughout. Assume that you’re explaining the answer to someone who doesn’t know the topic at all: 16. Explain the difference between absolute and comparative advantage. Be specific. How woulda country (or person) know that they had such an advantage?arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax
- Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningBrief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics Today and Tomorrow, Student EditionEconomicsISBN:9780078747663Author:McGraw-HillPublisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co





