Reason for shift of the U.S. income distribution in last two decades.
Explanation of Solution
In recent decades(from 1980s onward), the share of income earning by the top fifth has increased, and the share earnings by the bottom fifth has declined. The richest fifth’s share of income increased from 43.7 percent in 19900= to 51.1 percent in 2014. The foremost contributor to the larger share of income earning by the highest group has been the growth of two-earner households in that top group.
Note that in the top quantile, almost three out of the four households have two or more than two working. A major contributor to the smallest share earned by the lowest group has been the growth of single parent household in the bottom group.
Because of significant reduction in the marginal tax rates (in 1990 and 1996), high-income people had no incentive to engage in avoidance of tax, so their reported income increased. This boosted the share of reported earned income by the richest 5 percent of the households.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 18 Solutions
ECON MICRO (with MindTap, 1 term (6 months) Printed Access Card) (New, Engaging Titles from 4LTR Press)
- 2. (Rising Income Inequality in the United States.) The graph below appeared in a NYT article entitled “Why you should not believe those GDP Numbers,” by David Leonhardt. We analyzed this graph in class. Before answering this question, make sure to go over that discussion by reading the notes for lecture 1 ( Lecture1.pdf) or Chapter 1, Section 1, of SGU. Source: NYTimes, Dec. 16, 2019, Section A, Page 31 of the New York edition. Assume the economy consists of 100 individuals in 1947 and population is constant over time. Individual i has income yti in year t for i = 1,...,100 and t = 1947,1948,...,2018. Suppose, without loss of generality, that yi ≤ yi+1 . Let Yt denote total real GDP in year t, which is given by tt ?100 Yt= yti. i=1 Let Y 90 denote the total income going to the bottom 90 percent of the population, t and Y 10 the total income going to the top 10 percent of the population, t We then have ?90 Y90 = yi tt i=1 ?100 Y10 = yi. tt i=91 Y =Y90+Y10.…arrow_forwardK [Related to Don't Let This Happen To You!] Use the data for the country of New Finlandia in the following table to calculate the following: YEAR 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 REAL GDP PER CAPITA (2005 PRICES) $41,517 42,994 42,203 43,322 43,277 (HINT: Remember from the previous chapter that the average annual growth rate for relatively short periods can be approximated by averaging the growth rates of those years.) a. The percentage increase in real GDP per capita between 2010 and 2014 is%. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) b. The average annual growth rate in real GDP per capita between 2010 and 2014 is%. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.)arrow_forward2arrow_forward
- A1 The income cycle flow is designed to show the flow of economic activity in a country. So the income cycle streams are the income streams that exist between existing economic sectors. Definition and concept of state income balancearrow_forwardexplain how gross product is calculates using the income approacharrow_forwardWhat are the shortcomings of using GDP as a measure of economic welfare? What would to add to (or subtract from) GDP to make it a better reflection of how well people are doing in a nation? Short Answer ( a paragrapharrow_forward
- Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student EditionEconomicsISBN:9780078747663Author:McGraw-HillPublisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub CoEssentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax