(a)
Case summary: Persons C, O, and T want to establish a business of digital tablets. Person P tells that he will be in favor for the formation of the corporation. P enters into a contract with O for purchasing a piece of land. Person O is not aware of the way a corporation is formed at the time of signing the contract. P makes a contract with person B to construct a small plant on the property. The contract with person B is conditional on the formation of the corporation. The P secures all necessary documents and capitalization. P filed the articles of incorporation of the corporation.
To find:The liability of the corporation and person P for contracts signed with person O and person B.
(b)
Case summary: Persons C, O, and T want to establish a business of digital tablets. Person P tells that he will be in favor for the formation of the corporation. P enters into a contract with O for purchasing a piece of land. Person O is not aware of the way a corporation is formed at the time of signing the contract. P makes a contract with person B to construct a small plant on the property. The contract with person B is conditional on the formation of the corporation. The P secures all necessary documents and capitalization. P filed the articles of incorporation of the corporation.
To find: The liability of the corporation to the contract of person B once it is formed.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 18 Solutions
Bundle: The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th + Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card
- Phillip is a broker who was hired by Sam to help him find a new investment property. Phillip identifies a property that fits Sam's investing criteria. Sam asks Phillip to do some research and provide him with an opinion of title on the property. Is Phillip permitted to do this? ○ No. This would be considered an unauthorized practice of law. No. Phillip needs his sales associates license in order to issue an opinion of title. Yes. Brokers are always permitted to issue an opinion of title. Yes. As long as Phillip notifies FREC, he can issue an opinion of title.arrow_forwardhomas Persson and Jon Nokes founded Smart Inventions, Inc., to market household consumer products. The success of their first product, the Smart Mop, continued with later products, which were sold through infomercials and other means. Persson and Nokes were the firm’s officers and equal shareholders. Persson was responsible for product development, and Nokes was in charge of day-to-day operations. In time, they became dissatisfied with each other’s efforts. Nokes represented the firm as financially “dying,” “in a grim state, . . . worse than ever,” and offered to buy all of Persson’s shares for $1.6 million. Persson accepted.On the day that they signed the agreement to transfer the shares, Smart Inventions began marketing a new product—the Tap Light. It was an instant success, generating millions of dollars in revenues. In negotiating with Persson, Nokes had intentionally kept the Tap Light a secret. Persson sued Smart Inventions, asserting fraud and other claims. Under what principle…arrow_forwardMartina and Andrew are friends. They both have a keen interest in technology. They decide to form a business to pursue various technology projects, and decide that a company will be the best business structure to adopt. They establish Apricot Pty Ltd. Martina and Andrew are its only shareholders, and they are also its only directors. Martina takes a much more active role in managing the company than Andrew. Andrew relies heavily upon Martine to provide him with information about the company, particularly in relation to its finances, and its dealings with other companies. Andrew does not himself investigate the finances or transactions of Apricot Pty Ltd, other than by relying on Martina to provide him with this information. In June 2017, Martina arranges for Apricot Pty Ltd to purchase a very large quantity of electronics components. The components are acquired from ErinElectronics Pty Ltd, a company that Martina has a significant shareholding in. The transaction generates significant…arrow_forward
- Subject: acountingarrow_forwardSteven, an accountant, returning from his office, calls into a pub for a relaxing drink. He bumps into Paul, an old school friend, whom he has not seen for many years. During the course of the conversation over a number of pints, it emerges that Paul has recently inherited a substantial sum of money and is interested in investing in local businesses. Steven mentions that one of his clients, Precarious Ltd, is seeking financial backing and would make an attractive investment. By chance, he has a copy of the company’s accounts in his briefcase which he gives to Paul. Relying on these accounts, Paul invests £10,000 in Precarious Ltd, but loses everything when Precarious goes into liquidation six months later. In fact, the accounts had been prepared negligently and did not reflect the parlous state of the company’s affairs. Advise Paul.arrow_forwardSally and Tom decide to go into business, selling discounted merchandise through their website “e-Buy.” They sign a partnership agreement that requires Sally to contribute $12,000 and Tom to contribute $8,000 in capital to start the firm. The agreement also states that only Sally will have the authority to bind the partnership in deals with third parties, but the agreement says nothing about the management of the firm or a division of profits. Without Sally’s knowledge, Tom tells United Computer Products, Inc., that he represents the firm and signs a contract with United to buy hard drives for resale on e-Buy. In the first year, e-Buy makes a profit of $50,000. What are the partners’ rights with respect to the management of the firm? Is the partnership bound to the contract with United? Do the partners split the first year’s profits? If so, how much is each entitled to?arrow_forward
- Describe one the conditions that must be satisfied before a derivative suit can be instituted. A. The company is under the control of the majority shareholders/directors. B. A wrong must not have been done to the company by the majority shareholders. C. Any damages awarded will not go to the company but to plaintiff shareholder. D. An individual shareholder or minority decides to sue the wrongdoers for or on behalf of company.arrow_forwardEd Sabol, a once unhappy coat salesman, had a passion for filming his sons high school football games and other activities. Word of Eds filming abilities soon got around and he found himself working a number of local high school games. This led to Eds successful bid ($3,000) to film the 1962 NFL championship game. Then Commissioner Pete Rozelle was so impressed with the work that he agreed to Eds proposal to create a new entity known as NFL Films that would both preserve the history of the game and promote it to the nations sports fans. NFL Films creative approach to the game has resulted in 82 Emmy Awards to date. Ed retired in 1987, turning the reins over to his son Steve who has taken the company to new heights thanks in part to his empowering leadership style and product innovation. The company now has a 200,000 square foot state-of-the-art facility. Q1. Identify the entrepreneurial traits that Ed Sabol and his son Steve exhibit? Q2. How would you characterize the Sabols…arrow_forwardAnswer pleasearrow_forward
- If any of the owners decided eventually to sell any or all of their shares and had identified a potential buyer, they all agreed that Ay-Bee-Cee-Dee Corp. should be granted the right to match the offer of the potential buyer and, thereby, buy back the shares rather than allowing that potential buyer to become a part owner of the company. To accomplish this, which of the following types of restrictions on transfer needs to be attached to the shares? Multiple Choice Provision disqualifying purchasers Buy-and-sell agreement Consent restraint Right of first refusal Option agreementarrow_forwardMayflower Trucking Inc. incorporates and issues 1000 shares of common stock. Shawn owns 600 shares of Mayflower stock. If Mayflower is electing three directors and Shawn is the only shareholder to show up at the meeting: there is a quorum. there is not a quorum. a plurality. there is a proxy.arrow_forwardThe client seeks advice concerning the actions of the majority stockholder in a small corporation. The majority stockholder owns 58 percent of the stock, and the client and another shareholder together own 42 percent. The majority stockholder controls the board of directors and is president of the corporation. He refuses to allow the corporation to issue any stock dividends. Until recently, the client and the other minority stockholder worked for the corporation. Last month, the majority stockholder fired the client and the minority stockholder. What sections of Am. Jur. 2d discuss this topic?arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education