
Concept explainers
It is a method of cost accounting, which is used where the production is continuous, and the product needs various processes to complete. This method is used to ascertain the cost of the product at each process or stage of production.
To Prepare: The Memo to JM with a recommendation to management.

Explanation of Solution
Memo
From:
LB
Former Plant manager
Company GP
To:
JM
Current Plant manager
Company GP
Re: Analysis of August month increase in unit costs for Papermaking Department.
Dear Mr. JM,
The increase in the unit costs from the month of July to August happened for both the material costs (pulp and chemical) and conversion costs in the papermaking department, as showed in the table below:
Particulars | July | August |
Material costs (A) | $295,600 | $304,100 |
Conversion costs (B) | $146,000 | $149,600 |
Total cost (A+B) | $441,600 | $453,700 |
Number of tons (C') | 1,200 | 1,130 |
Material cost per ton D = (A ÷ C) | $246.33 | $269.12 |
Conversion cost per ton E =(B ÷ C) | $121.67 | $132.39 |
Total cost per ton (D + E) | $368 | $401.50 |
Table (1)
An analysis was done to segregate the reason of the increased cost per ton. My interviews designated that there were two possible causes. First, we changed the condition of the green paper in early month of August. This may changed the way the paper machines process the green paper. Therefore, it is feasible that the paper machines have unacceptable settings for the new requirement and are over applying materials. Second one is some question, whether paper machine No.1 is need of maintenance. It is possible that our problem is due to lack of repairs on this machine.
Luckily, we run both colors on paper machine No.1 Therefore; we can divide the analysis among these two possible explanations. I have offered the following cost per ton data for the two paper machines and the two product colors:
Analyzing paper machine:
Production Run Number | Paper Machine | Color | Materials costs | Conversion costs | Tons |
1 | 1 | Green | $40,300 | $18,300 | 150 |
2 | 1 | Yellow | $41,700 | $21,200 | 140 |
3 | 1 | Green | $44,600 | $22,500 | 150 |
4 | 1 | Yellow | $36,100 | $18,100 | 120 |
Total | $162,700 | $80,100 | 560 |
Table (2)
Paper Machine No.1 | Material cost per ton (A ÷ C) | Conversion cost per ton (B ÷ C) |
Total direct material costs (A) | $162,700 | |
Total conversion costs (B) | $80,100 | |
Tons (C ) | 560 | 560 |
Cost per ton | $290.54 | $143.04 |
Table (3)
Production Run Number | Paper Machine | Color | Materials costs | Conversion costs | Tons |
5 | 2 | Green | $38,300 | $18,900 | 160 |
6 | 2 | Yellow | $33,900 | $15,200 | 140 |
7 | 2 | Green | $35,600 | $18,400 | 130 |
8 | 2 | Yellow | $33,600 | $17,000 | 140 |
Total | $141,400 | $69,500 | 570 |
Table (4)
Paper Machine No.2 | Material cost per ton (A ÷ C) | Conversion cost per ton (B ÷ C) |
Total direct material costs | $141,400 | |
Total conversion costs | $69,500 | |
Tons | 570 | 570 |
Cost per ton | $248.07 | $121.93 |
Table (5)
Particulars | Paper Machine No.1 (A) | Paper Machine No.2 (B) | Difference (A – C) |
Material cost per ton | $290.54 | $143.04 | $147.50 |
Conversion cost per ton | $248.07 | $121.93 | $126.14 |
Table (6)
Product color analysis:
Production Run Number | Paper Machine | Color | Materials costs | Conversion costs | Tons |
1 | 1 | Green | $40,300 | $18,300 | 150 |
3 | 1 | Green | $44,600 | $22,500 | 150 |
5 | 2 | Green | $38,300 | $18,900 | 160 |
7 | 2 | Green | $35,600 | $18,400 | 130 |
Total | $158,800 | $78,100 | 590 |
Table (7)
Production Run Number | Paper Machine | Color | Materials costs | Conversion costs | Tons |
2 | 1 | Yellow | $41,700 | $21,200 | 140 |
4 | 1 | Yellow | $36,100 | $18,100 | 120 |
6 | 2 | Yellow | $33,900 | $15,200 | 140 |
8 | 2 | Yellow | $33,600 | $17,000 | 140 |
Total | $145,300 | $71,500 | 540 |
Table (8)
Green Paper | Material cost per ton (A ÷ C) | Conversion cost per ton (B ÷ C) |
Total direct material costs (A) | $158,800 | |
Total conversion costs (B) | $78,100 | |
Tons (C ) | 590 | 590 |
Cost per ton | $269.15 | $132.37 |
Table (9)
Yellow Paper | Material cost per ton (A ÷ C) | Conversion cost per ton (B ÷ C) |
Total direct material costs (A) | $145,300 | |
Total conversion costs (B) | $71,500 | |
Tons (C ) | 540 | 540 |
Cost per ton | $269.07 | $132.41 |
Table (10)
Particulars | Green Paper (A) | Yellow Paper (B) | Difference (A – C) |
Material cost per ton | $269.15 | $269.07 | $0.08 |
Conversion cost per ton | $132.37 | $132.41 | ($0.04) |
The outcomes are clear. Paper machine 1 has a considerably higher materials and conversion cost per ton in August. It appears that, the paper machine is over applying pulp. This is resultant in a growth in both the materials and conversion cost per ton. Paper machine No.2 is consecutively at a cost near out chronological cost per ton. There is no proof of a color delinquent. Both color papers are consecutively at or near the same materials and conversion cost per ton. Therefore, the requirement change for green has not performed to reason a problem in the papermaking operation. I
Please let me know if you need any more clarifications on this matter.
Regards,
LB
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 18 Solutions
Working Papers, Volume 1, Chapters 1-15 for Warren/Reeve/Duchac's Corporate Financial Accounting, 13th + Financial & Managerial Accounting, 13th
- account questionsarrow_forwardcompared to the individual risks of constituting assets. Question 5 (6 marks) The common shares of Almond Beach Inc, have a beta of 0.75, offer a return of 9%, and have an historical standard deviation of return of 17%. Alternatively, the common shares of Palm Beach Inc. have a beta of 1.25, offer a return of 10%, and have an historical standard deviation of return of 13%. Both firms have a marginal tax rate of 37%. The risk-free rate of return is 3% and the expected rate of return on the market portfolio is 9½%. 1. Which company would a well-diversified investor prefer to invest in? Explain why and show all calculations. 2. Which company Would an investor who can invest in the shares of only one firm prefer to invest in? Explain why. RELEASED BY THE CI, MGMT2023, MARCH 2, 2025 5 Use the following template to organize and present your results: Theoretical CAPM Actual offered prediction for expected return (%) return (%) Standard deviation of return (%) Beta Almond Beach Inc. Palm Beach…arrow_forwardprovide correct answerarrow_forward
- Please solve. The screen print is kind of split. Please look carefully.arrow_forwardCoronado Fire, Inc. manufactures steel cylinders and nozzles for two models of fire extinguishers: (1) a home fire extinguisher and (2) a commercial fire extinguisher. The home model is a high-volume (54,000 units), half-gallon cylinder that holds 2 1/2 pounds of multi- purpose dry chemical at 480 PSI. The commercial model is a low-volume (10,200 units), two-gallon cylinder that holds 10 pounds of multi-purpose dry chemical at 390 PSI. Both products require 1.5 hours of direct labor for completion. Therefore, total annual direct labor hours are 96,300 or [1.5 hours x (54,000+10,200)]. Estimated annual manufacturing overhead is $1,566,090. Thus, the predetermined overhead rate is $16.26 or ($1,566,090 ÷ 96,300) per direct labor hour. The direct materials cost per unit is $18.50 for the home model and $26.50 for the commercial model. The direct labor cost is $19 per unit for both the home and the commercial models. The company's managers identified six activity cost pools and related…arrow_forwardCoronado Fire, Inc. manufactures steel cylinders and nozzles for two models of fire extinguishers: (1) a home fire extinguisher and (2) a commercial fire extinguisher. The home model is a high-volume (54,000 units), half-gallon cylinder that holds 2 1/2 pounds of multi- purpose dry chemical at 480 PSI. The commercial model is a low-volume (10,200 units), two-gallon cylinder that holds 10 pounds of multi-purpose dry chemical at 390 PSI. Both products require 1.5 hours of direct labor for completion. Therefore, total annual direct labor hours are 96,300 or [1.5 hours x (54,000+ 10,200)]. Estimated annual manufacturing overhead is $1,566,090. Thus, the predetermined overhead rate is $16.26 or ($1,566,090 ÷ 96,300) per direct labor hour. The direct materials cost per unit is $18.50 for the home model and $26.50 for the commercial model. The direct labor cost is $19 per unit for both the home and the commercial models. The company's managers identified six activity cost pools and related…arrow_forward
- The completed Payroll Register for the February and March biweekly pay periods is provided, assuming benefits went into effect as anticipated. Required: Using the payroll registers, complete the General Journal entries as follows: February 10 Journalize the employee pay. February 10 Journalize the employer payroll tax for the February 10 pay period. Use 5.4 percent SUTA and 0.6 percent FUTA. No employees will exceed the FUTA or SUTA wage base. February 14 Issue the employee pay. February 24 Journalize the employee pay. February 24 Journalize the employer payroll tax for the February 24 pay period. Use 5.4 percent SUTA and 0.6 percent FUTA. No employee will exceed the FUTA or SUTA wage base. February 28 Issue the employee pay. February 28 Issue payment for the payroll liabilities. March 10 Journalize the employee pay. March 10 Journalize the employer payroll tax for the March 10 pay period. Use 5.4 percent SUTA and 0.6 percent FUTA. No employees will exceed the FUTA or SUTA wage base.…arrow_forwardPlease given step by step explanation general accounting questionarrow_forwardDon't use ai solution please given answer general accountingarrow_forward
- Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337912020Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. TaylerPublisher:South-Western College PubManagerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...AccountingISBN:9781337115773Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. HeitgerPublisher:Cengage LearningCornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage Learning


